Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***

Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:34 am to
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21139 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:34 am to
quote:

That isn’t happening now and won’t happen.



There have already been at least a hundred things that I've been told "would never happen" that have already happened due to the virus.

Say that the TSA doesn't do it. Individual airports could, or even airlines. Would I be more likely to fly an airline where everyone getting on the plane had been tested. Hell yeah. So would everyone else. As we expand rapid testing, it's going to happen.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40677 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Perhaps, but I’d wager that most businesses (or bosses?) still don’t “like” the work-from-home model. I know I can do a lot from home, but certainly lose a great deal of capacity. I can’t fill eight hours a day right now from home. I can’t be the only one.


A lot of my job is working my sales territory and being in front of customers. Drive time typically eats up a lot of my time cause my territory goes as far as 2 hours away. Between that time taken away and market slow down, I am much less busy than typical.

We have always had the freedom to work from home but now I can tell upper mgmt hates that it’s required. They were slow to do it since we were essential

My wife on the other hand has been working from for a month. They are ready to get back in the office but they are keeping up for the most part. After this, I envision that they will do a few work from home days a month if not more.
This post was edited on 4/9/20 at 9:38 am
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85718 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:38 am to
quote:

And I think you and I both know that you aren’t the only one


But don’t underestimate the penny pinchers at the top and challenging “we can put another 200k to the bottom line if we do remote meetings”
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85718 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Say that the TSA doesn't do it. Individual airports could, or even airlines. Would I be more likely to fly an airline where everyone getting on the plane had been tested. Hell yeah. So would everyone else. As we expand rapid testing, it's going to happen



Well frick it, let’s do it for everything then... everyone gets a Flu test from now on.

Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3211 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:41 am to
Per Capita Death Rate of NY State on par with Spain

CFR still way better for US reported statistics vs Spain/Italy

NY State:
151,171 cases, 6268 deaths, 318 deaths per 1MM people (no 4/9 report yet)

Spain:
152,446 cases, 15,238 deaths, 326 deaths per 1MM people (4/9 data reported)

Italy:
139,422 cases, 17,669 deaths, 292 deaths per 1MM people (no 4/9 data reported)

Louisiana:
17,030 cases, 653 deaths, 140 deaths per 1MM people. (no 4/9 data reported)
This post was edited on 4/9/20 at 9:44 am
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40677 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:45 am to
quote:

But don’t underestimate the penny pinchers at the top and challenging “we can put another 200k to the bottom line if we do remote meetings”



Here is how I see it happening:

Business travel is going to be cut across the board. In many cases it was already unnecessary. Like my lawyer neighbor who traveled from Houston to Pittsburgh every week.

The cost savings and revenue will be within an explainable margin so it won’t appear to be hurting business.

This will be the trend for awhile

Then 60 minutes will run some story on this revolutionary business that is seeing wild growth by having in person meetings
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85718 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Then 60 minutes will run some story on this revolutionary business that is seeing wild growth by having in person meetings


Oh I hate remote meetings... sucks so bad.

I’m 100% behind the in person model being more effective but when an exec is shown two balance sheet options, 9/10 they will choose the more cost efficient
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77890 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Would I be more likely to fly an airline where everyone getting on the plane had been tested. Hell yeah. So would everyone else.
That is stupid as hell.
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3211 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:59 am to
quote:

There have already been at least a hundred things that I've been told "would never happen" that have already happened due to the virus. Say that the TSA doesn't do it. Individual airports could, or even airlines. Would I be more likely to fly an airline where everyone getting on the plane had been tested. Hell yeah. So would everyone else. As we expand rapid testing, it's going to happen.


Test would have to be way less intrusive than a sinus swab to gain acceptance. Breathalizer type thing? The other problem is false positives. If a test has a false positive rate of 1%, and 1% of the population is sick - then 50% of all positives when you sample a random population will indeed be false.

It's either temperature measurement as part of your daily TSA groping or nothing.
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6795 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Not necessarily... now that all have worked remotely, I’d imagine a number of organizations decide to save money and go this route.
Disagreed. The amount of connection issues we've had with our Webex meetings this week have soured many on the virtual meeting craze.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85718 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Test would have to be way less intrusive than a sinus swab to gain acceptance.


And I’d imagine there are tons of HIPAA issues...
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85718 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Disagreed. The amount of connection issues we've had with our Webex meetings this week have soured many on the virtual meeting craze.



‘That’s bc you have tens of millions of people doing it all at once... won’t have that when interagency meetings can be in person with cross company meetings remote.
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
31030 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 10:07 am to
Good AM sheep.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21139 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Test would have to be way less intrusive than a sinus swab to gain acceptance


Oh, the FDA has already authorized tests using saliva. The days of needing a swab stuck all the way up your nose to the very back ... those days will soon be gone. It's likely that they were never really necessary in the first place.

And temperature measurement is insufficient if half the people with the virus don't have a fever.
Posted by Drive4show
Member since Aug 2009
452 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Currently, 16.6 million are out of work though and that seems to be increasing by 6 million+ each week.


Would be interested to know what this number would be if they weren't paying people close to $1,000 a week to file for unemployment
Posted by Shaun176
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
3163 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 10:38 am to
quote:


It's either temperature measurement as part of your daily TSA groping or nothing


Temp measurements is to make people feel better.

Covid has 50% asymptomatic and Temp measurements can be defeated by taking Advil for minor cases.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16197 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 10:56 am to
Airlines don’t want to deal with the privacy and HIPPA issues that would come with testing at the gate. Now I could easily see every passenger having their temperature taken.

Once people have a reason to travel again they will.
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
12565 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Airlines don’t want to deal with the privacy and HIPPA issues


HIPAA wouldn't apply to airlines
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85718 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

HIPAA wouldn't apply to airlines


How would it not if they were the ones required to do the tests?

Now if it’s the TSA before they can even enter the terminals it would default to them, but like I said, the TSA is terrible. You could swap TSA with Burger King workers and not skip a beat.
Posted by QboveTopSecret
America
Member since Feb 2018
3505 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 12:43 pm to


In just the space of three weeks, the United States has lost more jobs—over 17 million—than were lost in the entire Great Recession, an event that spanned roughly two years. That can only mean those same Americans who also hold a mortgage may now find themselves in the unthinkable position of being unable to make some or all of their monthly payments—perhaps for months, if not longer.
first pageprev pagePage 1031 of 1190Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram