- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clayton Kershaw pushed for Dodgers to announce Christian night in response to LGBTQ+
Posted on 5/31/23 at 2:40 pm to Klark Kent
Posted on 5/31/23 at 2:40 pm to Klark Kent
The fact that people can just a little bit agree that this is ok baffles me. Really it does.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 3:40 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
The fact that people can just a little bit agree that this is ok baffles me. Really it does.
That what is ok?
Posted on 5/31/23 at 5:48 pm to shel311
quote:
No clue who you are or what you're referencing
No worries it’s easy to link previous posts here. Watch:
When did a player with worse stats on a worse team with less previous playoff success win mvp over a player that has him beat on all the above?
You know, the same question you proved to be incapable of providing a single detail in response to on 7 different occasions in that thread before slinking away entirely.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 5:51 pm to shel311
quote:
That deflection from answering the question, right out of the cliche playbook.
That literal word for word quoting directly from the progressive playbook, as evidenced by the other progressives posting it on this very message board.
At least youve given up trying to pretend you’re not something you very clearly are.
quote:
Good work, you and Klark Kent have a lot in common with replying to me but being too scared to answer the questions because you know that's where your argument falls apart.
You talking about other people being too scared to answer questions

This post was edited on 5/31/23 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 5/31/23 at 6:47 pm to Open Your Eyes
maybe this will clarify it for him….
shel: you are the Mutumbo of this thread.

shel: you are the Mutumbo of this thread.
This post was edited on 5/31/23 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:31 pm to RLDSC FAN
If only these phaggits still got made fun of instead of actively encouraging them. God were fricked.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 11:11 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Individual priests rape kids but its not systemically pushed as normal by the institution.
Some could argue that the church just moving priests around multiple times and taking steps to hide it does normalize the behavior.
What's great is people can boycott both the church and Target. Never though I'd type that sentence out in my life but here we are.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 11:22 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
Just waiting for it all to crack off and this small percentage of mentals to be put in their place.
It’s not them, it’s people with real money and power who are using them to control you.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:50 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:Ahhhh, you're the guy who asked for an example, which I gave. But you didn't like it and you asked for all the examples in which there were 74 qualifiers to fit your exact criteria as your apparent gotcha reply.
No worries it’s easy to link previous posts here. Watch:
Yea, you really nailed that one.

One of my favorite message board-isms is when someone asks a question thinking they've proved their ultimate point, then the question is answered very easily to refute them, so they just pretend it never happened. Other than that, you're doing great, keep up the good work.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:52 am to Klark Kent
quote:Me: Catholic priests raping young boys is just as bad as trans raping young boys and deserves the same attention when it happens
shel: you are the Mutumbo of this thread.
Klark Kent: You're wrong, how dare you say that it's bad for catholic priests to rape young boys, that's such a moderate thing of you to say
Congrats, you played yourself. I noticed you didn't answer my question from before. I still can't figure out if you're excusing catholic priests raping young boys or just agreeing with me while angrily typing on your keyboard. Weird that you didn't answer, who could have ever guessed that...other than me stating you wouldn't answer the moment I posed the question. The fact that you think I'm getting dunked on leads me to believe it's the former, but you do you.
This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 9:54 am
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:46 am to shel311
there’s no linkable evidence of any of that being true.
this is just sad now. run along
this is just sad now. run along
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:58 am to RLDSC FAN
It’s hard to accept Pride when absolutely disgusting shite is being publicly tied to it and supported. If it was just normal LGBT people happy and celebrating, I think it really would be easier for more people to accept it. Their own movement doesn’t seem to police the crazies and bad actors, too many seem to support them.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 11:29 am to Klark Kent
quote:
there’s no linkable evidence of any of that being true.
this is just sad now. run along
He did the same shite to me. Tried to say that I was defending pedophile priests. This tactic by the left is disgusting, but not unexpected. They do like to project.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 11:34 am to shel311
quote:
Klark Kent: You're wrong, how dare you say that it's bad for catholic priests to rape young boys, that's such a moderate thing of you to say
You've resorted to just straight lying now. Maybe it's time to go back to the msb safe space
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:26 pm to shel311
Sigh, progressive shel
Really? This should be really interesting:
Link the example you gave.
So what is in reality 3 qualifiers, from the very beginning, somehow turned into 13 qualifiers according to you in that thread, and has now turned into 74 qualifiers. That’s some progressive math if I’ve ever seen it.
But none of that really matters. Know why progressive shel? Because your first post in that thread responding to those exact same 3/13/74/whatever number you come up with next qualifications will continue existing exactly the same.
So like they've always done, not just to the white player. THAT is the point.
I’ve never seen someone so dead set on claiming victory on an internet message board. But the fact that you are, and have failed so spectacular yet again in doing so, is certainly entertaining.
Mine too. Link the specific example of that happening in this instance that you’re referring to.
How does that message board-ism compare to the one about having to lie about other posters arguments so you can self proclaim victory?
You know my other favorite message board-ism? The one where someone realizes they are so incredibly and thoroughly incorrect in their position they fall into the death March posting pattern in the thread: Going from over-confidently stating their incorrect ‘osition to declaring themselves ‘victorious’ in the thread for absolutely no reason to posting nothing but emoticons to completing their bitch out by exiting the thread completely and hoping no one will notice. “Slinking away” as you put it.
Sound familiar? It should.
Tell us progressive shel, what did you do with your beto yard sign this year after his latest failure in running for elected office? Did you throw it away, or just store it somewhere to be brought back out in 2 years when he launches his next political grift operation you and your moronic ilk will fall for?
quote:
Ahhhh, you're the guy who asked for an example, which I gave.
Really? This should be really interesting:
Link the example you gave.
quote:
But you didn't like it and you asked for all the examples in which there were 74 qualifiers to fit your exact criteria as your apparent gotcha reply.
So what is in reality 3 qualifiers, from the very beginning, somehow turned into 13 qualifiers according to you in that thread, and has now turned into 74 qualifiers. That’s some progressive math if I’ve ever seen it.
But none of that really matters. Know why progressive shel? Because your first post in that thread responding to those exact same 3/13/74/whatever number you come up with next qualifications will continue existing exactly the same.
So like they've always done, not just to the white player. THAT is the point.
quote:
Yea, you really nailed that one.
I’ve never seen someone so dead set on claiming victory on an internet message board. But the fact that you are, and have failed so spectacular yet again in doing so, is certainly entertaining.
quote:
One of my favorite message board-isms is when someone asks a question thinking they've proved their ultimate point, then the question is answered very easily to refute them, so they just pretend it never happened.
Mine too. Link the specific example of that happening in this instance that you’re referring to.
How does that message board-ism compare to the one about having to lie about other posters arguments so you can self proclaim victory?
You know my other favorite message board-ism? The one where someone realizes they are so incredibly and thoroughly incorrect in their position they fall into the death March posting pattern in the thread: Going from over-confidently stating their incorrect ‘osition to declaring themselves ‘victorious’ in the thread for absolutely no reason to posting nothing but emoticons to completing their bitch out by exiting the thread completely and hoping no one will notice. “Slinking away” as you put it.
Sound familiar? It should.
quote:
Other than that, you're doing great, keep up the good work.
Tell us progressive shel, what did you do with your beto yard sign this year after his latest failure in running for elected office? Did you throw it away, or just store it somewhere to be brought back out in 2 years when he launches his next political grift operation you and your moronic ilk will fall for?
This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 6/1/23 at 8:51 pm to Open Your Eyes
He has outed himself as a 12 year old troll, just ignore it.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:17 pm to Klark Kent
quote:Still can't answer my question, further proving my point.
there’s no linkable evidence of any of that being true.
this is just sad now. run along
Why are you losing your shite if you agree with me that anyone who rapes a kid is bad and deserves the hate they get? Or do you not disagree?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:19 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:So you agree with me too that all child raping is bad? Interesting.
He did the same shite to me. Tried to say that I was defending pedophile priests. This tactic by the left is disgusting, but not unexpected
quote:Who are you talking about? Sure as shite ain't me, you can't be that stupid to think I'm Left. Are you that stupid?
This tactic by the left is disgusting, but not unexpected. They do like to project.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:21 pm to Open Your Eyes
Lot of words, all unnecessary.
I'm sorry you care this deeply about something that happened weeks ago to the point you're writing essays to me still, but it's not making you any less wrong than you were days ago.
I'm sorry you care this deeply about something that happened weeks ago to the point you're writing essays to me still, but it's not making you any less wrong than you were days ago.
This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:29 pm to shel311
quote:
Who are you talking about? Sure as shite ain't me, you can't be that stupid to think I'm Left. Are you that stupid?
There he is again, definitely not a progressive shel. Despite regurgitating the progressive playbook throughout this thread

Popular
Back to top
