Started By
Message

re: CDC weighs increasing time between vaccine doses to lower risk of heart inflammation

Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:29 am to
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68469 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Hmmm, did I really? I have to check back and see.


Don't edit that shite now
Posted by Boomdaddy65201
BoCoMo
Member since Mar 2020
4525 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:31 am to
National news/evening news from the big 3 that a vast majority of Americans are exposed to. Fair enough, my point is most people here are educated to the information available the vast majority of Americans have no clue this even a possibility as it’s never been widely broadcasted or admitted.
This post was edited on 2/7/22 at 10:33 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111471 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:33 am to
The OP himself was posting this in June, but somehow forgot about it

You can’t just blame everything on the media
This post was edited on 2/7/22 at 10:34 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Don't edit that shite now


I won't.

I believe this is the only thread were we talked about the vaccine LINK

You may be confusing me with someone else. I've never doubted that myocarditis is a possible side effect. In fact from a mechanism point of view it makes perfect sense if the mRNA escapes the injection site.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:36 am to
quote:

as it’s never been widely broadcasted or admitted.
it was all over every news channel last summer as people were debating vaccines for people under 18. There were plenty of threads here about it too.

Your post is another in a long line of examples of confirmation bias. You assume facts because it’s the narrative you expose yourself to daily. It’s particularly interesting because you are able to identify this same behavior in the group of people you disagree with that do the same thing, but fail to notice that you do it as well.

We are all susceptible, so it helps to develop some self awareness and humility about it all.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:37 am to
quote:

The OP himself was posting this in June, but somehow forgot about it

You can’t just blame everything on the media



The difference between June and now is the CDC now is making recommendations to do something about heart inflammation side effects and that is to lengthen the time between doses.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89799 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:39 am to
quote:

I'm trying really hard to see the "dunk" here


You are part of a cult
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111471 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:39 am to
quote:

The difference between June and now is the CDC now is making recommendations to do something about heart inflammation side effects and that is to lengthen the time between doses.
Agreed

Maybe stout should edit this then

quote:

So they are finally admitting the vaccine causes heart inflammation


Especially considering he had this thread in June



This post was edited on 2/7/22 at 10:40 am
Posted by bootycricket1
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2011
1292 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:40 am to
I took the vaccine and regret it.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86193 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:42 am to
quote:

The difference between June and now is the CDC now is making recommendations to do something about heart inflammation side effects and that is to lengthen the time between doses.


nobody was approved for even a 3rd shot in June

this is about length of time between 3rd and 4th doses

I realize none of y'all read past the headlines, but maybe try sometime?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86193 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:42 am to
quote:

You are part of a cult


look another word that has lost all meaning
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182394 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Well this is fricking awkward


quote:

just posted its myocarditis/pericarditis update. They are now admitting that post-second dose risk in people under 25 could be over 200x the background rate (and that’s not accounting for underreporting).


Seems vastly different from my current OP

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86193 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Seems vastly different from my current OP


and you called us obtuse
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111471 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:44 am to
In your OP today you say

quote:

So they are finally admitting the vaccine causes heart inflammation


In June you started a thread that said cdc admits myocarditis is a risk.

You are all over the place
This post was edited on 2/7/22 at 10:45 am
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182394 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:46 am to
quote:

In June you started a thread that said cdc admits myocarditis is a risk.


In that thread in June, it clearly shows they were saying it was only to a very specific group of people. You left that part out.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86193 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:47 am to
quote:

In that thread in June, it clearly shows they were saying it was only to a very specific group of people. You left that part out.


are you fricking with us right now?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111471 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:47 am to
quote:

In that thread in June, it clearly shows they were saying it was only to a very specific group of people. You left that part out.

Dude, have you read your HUGE ULDATE report today?
This post was edited on 2/7/22 at 10:48 am
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:48 am to
I predict in 2023 a Stout thread titled “After long term study CDC finally admits a side effect of Vaccine is Myocarditis.”
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182394 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:55 am to
The CDC had reports as far back as April that I can find and they said they were still investigating it.

In June, it was still only a possibility for a very specific small group of people.

They didn't even begin to admit it was a wider problem with an update on their site until November 2021 though it was still pretty vague.

Now it appears, with the news in the OP, they are admitting it by spacing out the time between doses.

To say they have been upfront about it is being obtuse at best or just outright lying.

I know you three that swim to every CV19 thread I make will never see it as such but that is how it is.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111471 posts
Posted on 2/7/22 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Now it appears, with the news in the OP, they are admitting it by spacing out the time between doses.
You might want to read the actual article you posted man. It’s for AN EXTREMELY SMALL SUBSET OF THE POPULATION

quote:

To say they have been upfront about it is being obtuse at best or just outright lying.
explain this. Posting multiple studies and updating their info frequently is exactly what they should be doing
This post was edited on 2/7/22 at 10:57 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram