Started By
Message

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:53 pm to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61391 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

I read the question as the the treadmill belt will match the speed of the wheels
Yet you said the wheels were motionless
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Yet you said the wheels were motionless


because...
quote:

he plane would have to move for the wheels to start moving. Once moving, the treadmill would not be bale to stop the plane's initial movement, as the only contact the treadmill has with anything on the plane is the wheels, which are not part of the plane's "drivetrain."
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61391 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

he plane would have to move for the wheels to start moving. Once moving, the treadmill would not be bale to stop the plane's initial movement, as the only contact the treadmill has with anything on the plane is the wheels, which are not part of the plane's "drivetrain."
So the wheels would not match the treadmill speed exactly, as in the question?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

So the wheels would not match the treadmill speed exactly, as in the question?


They both would be at zero RPM. ETA If we are staying within the constraints of the riddle.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 2:59 pm
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22965 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

They both would be at zero RPM


RPMs is a really bad way to measure wheel speed and the speed of the conveyor belt here. The conveyor belt obviously has a much larger diameter than the wheels, so even if they are traveling at the same RPM (assuming it's not 0) the speed of the conveyor belt will be much, much, higher.

And the only way for the wheels to remain completely stationary is for them to be completely locked which is not indicated in the hypothetical.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

RPMs is a really bad way to measure wheel speed and the speed of the conveyor belt here.


0 is 0.
quote:

And the only way for the wheels to remain completely stationary is for them to be completely locked which is not indicated in the hypothetical.


But to match the wheel speed exactly, the only way the plane doesn't move is if they are both at 0.

ETA And I say 0 rpm, because the wheel would technically have a speed in the horizontal when the thrust of the plane overcame the force of friction and moved the plane
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 3:13 pm
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22965 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

But to match the wheel speed exactly, the only way the plane doesn't move is if they are both at 0.


Or if they both begin moving at the exact same time.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Or if they both begin moving at the exact same time.


The wheels would have to be part of the drivetrain for that to happen with the plane not moving.
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
16712 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

And the only way for the wheels to remain completely stationary is for them to be completely locked which is not indicated in the hypothetical.


I'm starting to subscribe to if you made this big arse treadmill, you better make it capable of going fast enough to push enough air to lift the 747 from a stationary position.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36787 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:16 pm to





This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 3:18 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Just like a car until it lifts off


Nothing like a car actually, unless the car is jet powered
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22965 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:18 pm to
Correct, which is why the hypothetical is broken. An instantaneous feedback loop like contemplated in the hypothetical is never triggered because the only way the conveyor belt moves is if the wheels move, but the wheels can't move because it means the wheels exceeded the speed of the conveyor belt.

The question is as much philosophical as it is a physics question. It's like the Achilles Paradox.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Correct, which is why the hypothetical is broken. An instantaneous feedback loop like contemplated in the hypothetical is never triggered because the only way the conveyor belt moves is if the wheels move, but the wheels can't move because it means the wheels exceeded the speed of the conveyor belt.


I think the wheels and belt would be both be at 0 and the thrust of the plane would just drag the plane across the belt. I am 100% confident the plane will move ETA: unless the magic belt generates more friction than the plane generates thrust, then the plane doesn't move.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 3:22 pm
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6960 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

unless the magic belt generates more friction than the plane generates thrust, then the plane doesn't move.

It took you 20+ pages to finally understand the magic treadmill. Well done sir
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

It took you 20+ pages to finally understand the magic treadmill. Well done sir


Nowhere in the constraints of the OP is the friction discussed
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22965 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Nowhere in the constraints of the OP is the friction discussed


If there's no friction at all in the hypothetical (not just with respect to the wheels) then the plane cannot take off because friction is what causes the pressure differential on the wings to create lift.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6960 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Nowhere in the constraints of the OP is the friction discussed


True.. It only says the conveyor belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

If there's no friction at all in the hypothetical (not just with respect to the wheels) then the plane cannot take off because friction is what causes the pressure differential on the wings to create lift.


But the plane would move
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30280 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:44 pm to
This is such a stupid question how it's worded, and is requiring assumptions to be made.




If the plane's engines are on, then it's going to make the plane go forward since the plane's power is simply to push the plane forward, with the wheels similar to a car being in neutral.

WHen they say the wheels and belt are the same speed, i assume what they mean is that same distance is being displaced by both the wheel and the belt as they move simultaneously, thus the plane doesn't actually move horizontally. I guess that's there way of saying ignore other forces like friction and gravity. In actuality, this would require a lot of physics to figure out how both the wheels and belt can be at teh same speed.
This is no different than if you put a toy car on a treadmill and put your finger behind the car and turned the treadmill on. the wheels will turn, and the belt will turn, but the car won't move b/c you're applying the force along the x-axis onto it, same as the planes engines.

If the plane isn't moving along the x-axis, then air isn't passing over and under the wings, and if that isn't happening, then it's impossible to achieve lift.
I'm assuming the way this stupid question is posed, i am too assume the plane will not actually move along the x-axis, even though in reality it woudl be extremely difficult to achieve this.





Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
34377 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

great minds


Speak for yourself.
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram