Started By
Message

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

every time he mentions the thrust of the aircraft overcoming the speed of the treadmill he does this


Nope. Y'all choose to ignore the rest of what I say.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87335 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Just like how you completely ignored my questions to again tell me I just don't understand
I'm sorry. What questions?


While we are at it, can you explain why this guy at 1;19ish is wrong about the interplay between the treadmill and the plane wheels?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

I'm sorry. What questions?


No shock you can't read too.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22965 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:27 pm to
Everybody is just talking past each other. meansonmy nailed it a few pages back. The hypothetical posed in the OP is flawed because in this make believe universe the plane cannot move forward if the wheels and belt are moving at the same speed in opposite directions unless the wheels are skidding.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36787 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

The hypothetical posed in the OP is flawed because in this make believe universe the plane cannot move forward if the wheels and belt are moving at the same speed in opposite directions unless the wheels are skidding.



I agree with that.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87335 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

The hypothetical posed in the OP is flawed because in this make believe universe the plane cannot move forward if the wheels and belt are moving at the same speed in opposite directions unless the wheels are skidding.
That's exactly right though.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87335 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

No shock you can't read too.
Fantastic response.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

That's exactly right though.


So in your mind, this magic conveyor belt has enough friction to overcome the thrust generated by a 747.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
34379 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:31 pm to
What happens to the sail boat when the former NASA engineer plugs in the giant fan?

LINK ]
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Fantastic response.


Oh I'm sorry, should I have asked "what questions" even though they are right there on your screen?
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61391 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:32 pm to
You keep mentioning the power of the plane. It isn’t relevant. It could be a hobby plane. Or a Cessna 152.

The treadmill is magic as it and the wheels are synced.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

You keep mentioning the power of the plane. It isn’t relevant
quote:

The treadmill is magic as it and the wheels are synced.
And the thrust will over come it
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87335 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

this magic conveyor belt has enough friction to overcome the thrust generated by a 747
Wow dude. I really didn't know your lack of understanding was this deep. Here's a succinct reply that reflects what's going on here:

quote:

Many people are looking at this wrong. They seem to not consider that for the entire time of the "experiment", the full weight of the plane is supported by the wheels which remain in contact with the ground (the conveyor belt).

In the In the first scenario, as soon as the plane moves any amount forward, the conveyor belt moves the plane back to the starting point. It doesn't matter how the plane is propelled forward, as soon as the plane tries to move any amount forward, the conveyor belt moves the plane back to the starting point.

There is no "faster and faster till infinity" issue. The plane is not moving relative to the objects around it. The wheels will spin faster and faster (rpms) until the plane is at full throttle at which time the speed of the wheels will level off to a "constant" speed.

The speed of the plane relative to the objects around it, and relative to the air around the plane, and relative to the Earth, would be 0. It would never have a chance to overcome inertia.

The most important thing a plane needs in order to fly, is lift. In order to generate and sustain the amount of lift required, a minimum airspeed is necessary. With the plane at rest, it will never achieve the lift necessary for flight.

In the second scenario, well it seems a little bit contrived, but yes. As soon as the speed of the plane relative to the objects around it, and relative to the air around the plane, and relative to the Earth reaches sufficient airspeed, the plane will fly, as it normally does.


Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:35 pm to
It's adorable that all you can do is link videos and copy other people's words.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87335 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

The treadmill is magic as it and the wheels are synced.
And the thrust will over come it
How? The axles of the wheels cannot move forward if the wheels are being counteracted by the treadmill. You realize the treadmill is moving, right?
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61391 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

And the thrust will over come it
nope.

You can’t just keep changing the parameters. In your ramblings you have acknowledged the hole in your argument repeatedly. But keep digging
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

n the In the first scenario, as soon as the plane moves any amount forward, the conveyor belt moves the plane back to the starting point. It doesn't matter how the plane is propelled forward, as soon as the plane tries to move any amount forward, the conveyor belt moves the plane back to the starting point.


How can this happen though? The wheels are not what moves the plane forward or backward.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61391 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

It's adorable that all you can do is link videos and copy other people's words.
when students are really really dense it helps to present as many different sets of information as you can. Learning styles differ.
Posted by Power-Dome
Member since Nov 2012
1250 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:37 pm to
The plane starts out with zero thrust, zero forward velocity, zero wheel rotation, zero treadmill rotation.

The wheels do not turn, and the jet will propel the treadmill track forward, while the wheels remain at zero rotation, and then it will get fast enough to take off in the conventional sense of hydrodynamic lift
Posted by TD422
Destrehan, LA
Member since Jun 2019
867 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

No shock you can't read too.


C'mon, man, you can do better than this.

I get the impression AlxTgr, like me, was just interested in maybe figuring out WHY we're so far apart on this. Instead, I'm a dumb arse and he can't read. There's a pattern here that needs to be broken.
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19 20 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram