Started By
Message

re: Can someone explain to be how sobriety check points are legal?

Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:24 pm to
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6114 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

You want to live in an organized society, this is a small inconvenience that I support based on the mountain of evidence that assholes who are drunk off their asses will think of no one but themselves when drinking and driving.

I bet 99% of drivers passing through a checkpoint are sober. This is an infringement upon rights. Would you consent to being live monitored by police 24/7 to prevent you from committing any crimes?
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6114 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

This appears to be a very divisive issue. I can see both sides have valid points.


It is divisive. But if you support unconstitutional checkpoints because drunk drivers take lives, the same argument could also support frisking black people at any moment with no suspicious just because they do the most shootings and that take lives.

Problem with government overreach is that it's a slippery slope and they will take as much power as you let them.
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1430 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:36 pm to
Been legal for 40 years, and practiced for at least 50.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
62521 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Travel La 415 where it intersects US 190 westbound. LSP has been known to post up right there with some regularity during daytime hours.


They used to be there all the time.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
76234 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Your house is not the same as a public road.


Is it the same as a private car?
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
10729 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:04 pm to
There's case law. Idr, no arbitrary discrimination, driving is a privilege and not a right.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
62521 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:05 pm to
From AI:

quote:

DUI checkpoints are legal because the U.S. Supreme Court has determined that, under certain conditions, they do not violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. These conditions require the checkpoints to be conducted according to strict, non-discriminatory guidelines that balance public safety with individual rights, such as publicizing them in advance, having a supervisory officer make operational decisions, and limiting the time drivers are detained. The primary purpose is to deter drunk driving by increasing the perceived risk of being caught, rather than arbitrary stops.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
15872 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:05 pm to
One thing you don’t want to do is pull over and run away

Trust me on that
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
8879 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:11 pm to
Lost a family member to a drunk driver.

Driving is a privilege, not a right.

If you feel like getting blitzed, walk home.

Team Checkpoint
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
6423 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:12 pm to
only people against it are drunk drivers
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6114 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

only people against it are drunk drivers



Would you support police entering your house at random and doing a search to make sure you hadn't committed any crimes? Because this is the exact same concept.
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1430 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:19 pm to
Literally not.
Posted by onelochevy
Slidell, LA
Member since Jan 2011
18013 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Would you support police entering your house at random and doing a search to make sure you hadn't committed any crimes? Because this is the exact same concept.


I'm not going to have a head on collision with a family on their way home from soccer while I'm sitting on my couch at home.
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6114 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

I'm not going to have a head on collision with a family on their way home from soccer while I'm sitting on my couch at home.


This ignores the question. if you support allowing the police to stop drivers and question them without any evidence, then the logical leap is police can enter your home and search at any time. After all, if you're not doing anything wrong you have nothing to hide.
Posted by Lombardi44
Member since Feb 2010
414 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:30 pm to
Dumas.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
129041 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

By stopping and checking everyone, there is no profiling or discrimination.


Magically the checkpoints are never in the hood

They target people that will pay their way through the court system
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
6423 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Would you support police entering your house at random and doing a search to make sure you hadn't committed any crimes? Because this is the exact same concept.


Not even remotely the same...
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6114 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Not even remotely the same...



Why do you say this? Protection from police pulling you over at random despite committing no crimes and interrogating you is granted by the 4th amendment. Protection from police entering and searching your home without your permission or a warrant is granted by the 4th amendment.

If you support the 4th amendment being set aside because of "public interest" for DUI checkpoints then it's just a matter of time until that same concept is used against you to search your home on a whim because of "public interest". I don't know how you're incapable of understanding this. Well, you might be fricking dumb I guess.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
76234 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

only people against it are drunk drivers


Well, also people who want you to have the right to make sweeping statements with no solid basis. And you know, have the right to due process, right to privacy in your property... But yeah, just drunk drivers.

Sigh
Posted by Gifman
Member since Jan 2021
17136 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 9:44 pm to
They’re not legal
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram