Started By
Message
locked post

Can someone explain lawsuit awards to me?

Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:34 pm
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41634 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:34 pm
I don’t have any knowledge in this stuff and the thread the other day about the condo owner got me thinking.

Say a plaintiff gets $10 million awarded. Is this paid out based on defendants salary/assets? A small % paid each month/year? Or can assets be seized to pay the plaintiff off as quickly as possible

I’ve always wondered how these big $ cases are paid especially vs. individuals or a small company
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79744 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:35 pm to
Im going to say it depends on a case by case basis.

Not a lawyer though.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:35 pm to
Let me get my legal team on this for you real quick.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
197943 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

I’ve always wondered how these big $ cases are paid especially vs. individuals or a small company

often they arent

quote:

Say a plaintiff gets $10 million awarded. Is this paid out based on defendants salary/assets? A small % paid each month/year? Or can assets be seized to pay the plaintiff off as quickly as possible

depends on the State

quote:

I don’t have any knowledge in this stuff and the thread the other day about the condo owner got me thinking.

youve come to the right place
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116445 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:36 pm to
Are you saying that it’s your money and you need it now?
Posted by Spankum
The Sip
Member since Jan 2007
63272 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

I’ve always wondered how these big $ cases are paid especially vs. individuals or a small company


they aren't...they are appealed down to something reasonable.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
86377 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:38 pm to
You usually get a check from an insurance company. You can also elect to have it paid out in an annuity if you’d like. If there is not insurance money available, you can garnish wages or seize assets. However, personal, non-intentional acts are dischargeable in bankruptcy.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 8:40 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106024 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

they aren't...they are appealed down to something reasonable.


Or negotiated. Better to get something than nothing. You can't collect a 10 million judgment that the defendant doesn't have
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31125 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:51 pm to
Normally an entity will only be sued if they have assets or insurance that make the case worth the cost. If it is covered by insurance they normally pay immediately unless they feel an appeal is worth the cost. If the verdict is over the limits of the policy once it is paid they usually have no more responsibility to defend. The remainder of the verdict if not appealed by the defendant becomes a judgment debt. If there is no insurance the total verdict becomes a judgment debt. There are processes to seize assets to satisfy the debt.

Larger companies and insurance pay, low net worth individuals and smaller companies sometimes can't and have to fight seizure if the verdict is worth the trouble for the plaintiff. People with limited assets and income are generally considered judgment proof unless there is insurance.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 8:53 pm
Posted by Tortious
ATX
Member since Nov 2010
5768 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:58 pm to
Most times it isn't worth the paper it's written on
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69234 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:00 pm to
Insurance companies normally pay judgments in injury cases. Getting a judgment against an individual is usually worthless unless they have assets you can seize. Judgments have teeth against companies with assets that’s why they mostly have assists. But some companies have self insured retentions so they can control litigation as opposed to letting the insurance company dictate the litigation defense against companies. There are many different ways awards against companies and individuals are handled.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59343 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:02 pm to
Aren’t you that guy that said all the racist shite to black recruits on twitter
Posted by MeridianDog
Home on the range
Member since Nov 2010
14539 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:13 pm to
I was VP of quality in a company who was sued by someone who claimed design flaw. I am unable to discuss the case details, but they won a $2,000,000.00 judgment. No one died and there was no permanent injury. The loss was covered by insurance. Our insurance company offered the family an annuity that guaranteed them a substantial amount of money per year, coverage of all college expenses for their 2 children and a cash payout at 20 years.


In their words, they said, "Hell no. We want our money now." I assume our insurer wrote them a check. Our insurance rep assured me they would be broke in a year or two. I have always assumed they were. I was the company rep during the trial. It was my job to sit at the defendant's table each day. Every time they looked at us, I could see the dollar signs in their eyes.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31125 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Our insurance company offered the family an annuity that guaranteed them a substantial amount of money per year, coverage of all college expenses for their 2 children and a cash payout at 20 years.


In their words, they said, "Hell no. We want our money now."


Annuities as a settlement vehicle are poor financial decisions on the part of the plaintiff. If they want an annuity they can take the lump sum and buy one with better terms the next day. Any decent attorney will do everything they can to connect the plaintiff with a financial counselor when a settlement or payout is significantly beyond their normal means.

ETA Annuities also don't prevent them from accessing the money, they can simply sell the annuity if they choose.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 9:29 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106024 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:24 pm to
My cousin's husband was killed in an industrial accident. She got a nice annuity but her second husband was bipolar and he blew through it anyway.
Posted by ellunchboxo
G-Town
Member since Feb 2009
19539 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

I don’t have any knowledge


We know.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:46 pm to
Plaintiff gets a judgement. Sometimes the judgment debtor can afford to pay, often there is insurance coverage, sometimes liens get placed on the judgment debtors property, sometimes assets gets seized and auctioned, sometimes wages get garnished and sometimes the judgement debtor files for bankruptcy.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
111626 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

If there is not insurance money available, you can garnish wages or seize assets. However, personal, non-intentional acts are dischargeable in bankruptcy.




Gotta know how to setup that bad faith excess judgment on a minimal policy, breh.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
86377 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:52 pm to
Sometimes the insurance company does it for you
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Gotta know how to setup that bad faith excess judgment on a minimal policy, breh.


that's a pro move
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram