- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:18 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
think the basic question is why does simply carrying cash imply required suspicion?
I agree with you on the CAF being atrocious, but let's be fair about their argument - simply carrying cash won't get it seized. They need probable cause to seize it.
However, when they need probable cause, they'll make damn sure they find it. It's a racket, plain and simple.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:18 pm to BayouFann
quote:
Cross state lines with more than $9k and you kinda deserve your headache
Should we post troopers at Interstate welcome centers to make sure this ain't happening more?
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:19 pm to NYNolaguy1
They need to give this baw his money back, along with a 3 piece w/red beans, for his trouble. He also needs to be allowed to punch them in the face.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:19 pm to BayouFann
I'm fundamentally states rights, small Government,indivual. Freedom first no matter what and that's why I support asset forfeiture. Not good reason in this age to carry that much cash on one's person.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:19 pm to MrLarson
quote:
BS but if you are going to carry over 10k you might want to have proof of where that cash came from.
Show me in the constitution where it says this? All I can find is this....
quote:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Seems pretty cut and dry to me that this man’s 4th Amendment rights were completely shat upon by these DEA thugs.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:20 pm to Darth_Vader
Show me in the constitution where it says you can't smoke drugs?
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:21 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
I'm fundamentally states rights, small Government,indivual. Freedom first no matter what and that's why I support asset forfeiture. Not good reason in this age to carry that much cash on one's person.
So you want the government to arbitrarily be able to decide how much money you can carry on you? And if they decide you have more than you need they can just take it?
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:22 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
Not good reason in this age to carry that much cash on one's person.
Only an authoritarian would think you need a reason, much less a "good" one.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:22 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
Show me in the constitution where it says you can't smoke drugs?
What the frick does drugs have to do with this man and his money? He didn’t even have drugs on him.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:22 pm to Darth_Vader
As long as the government stays small and don't overreach then, yes. I'm small Government.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:22 pm to slackster
quote:
simply carrying cash won't get it seized. They need probable cause to seize it.
Fortunately he is always close by, especially given almost all cash has residual traces of drugs on it
.Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:23 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
As long as the government stays small and don't overreach then, yes. I'm small Government.
Or as long as people can give you a "good reason" for doing whatever they happen to be doing.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:24 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
What the frick does drugs have to do with this man and his money? He didn’t even have drugs on him.
You taking his side over law enforcement t who have sworn an oath to serve and protect? The dogs smelled drugs.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:24 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
What the frick does drugs have to do with this man and his money? He didn’t even have drugs on him.
Why couldn't the man deposit the money before heading home?
Would you carry 29k in cash? Anywhere?
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:24 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
Freedom first no matter what and that's why I support asset forfeiture. Not good reason in this age to carry that much cash on one's person.
Nothing says freedom like restricting how much cash you can have.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:24 pm to MrLarson
quote:
CAF is BS but if you are going to carry over 10k you might want to have proof of where that cash came from.
How does this work exactly? A bank receipt doesn't list the serial number of each note.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:24 pm to slackster
quote:
They need probable cause to seize it.
Your idea of probable cause and LE's idea of probably cause, when there are thousands of free money at stake, are worlds apart.
Tennessee is notorious for CAF on interstates. If I recall, their "probable cause" is simply the amount of cash you have. If it's over $x, they're taking it and there's not a fricking thing you can do about it.
Back the blue though, eh?
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:25 pm to ThatMakesSense
Doesn't fit the Perp's narrative.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 4:26 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Yuba City
Witnessed a murder there in '08.
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News