Started By
Message

re: Based on the graphic, which OTers have reached the top 1% mecca??

Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:32 pm to
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61593 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

People don't always factor this is and take a "raise" and end up netting less money because of being in higher tax bracket. That is why is plateaus, because the smart people (the only ones that make that much money) know it is sometimes better to have a lower salary in the end.
Please outline a specific situation where a accepting a raise would result in lower net pay. Thanks.
Posted by jdeval1
Member since Dec 2009
7525 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:34 pm to
Not an OT baller but we are in the upper income group in this area using that calculator
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19448 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:36 pm to
This is probably single income
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12785 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:36 pm to
Bahahahaha, Jesus. I'm well into the top 1% for my age.

But the 1% isn't an issue. It's the top .01%.
Posted by JetFuelTyga
Born in desert,raised in lion's den
Member since Feb 2016
1799 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Please outline a specific situation where a accepting a raise would result in lower net pay. Thanks.



Easy.

418,000 is in 35% tax bracket. This would mean 271,700 (65%) would be take home pay.

Let's say this person received a $5k raise bringing salary to $423,000 which is in 39.6% bracket. Take home pay would then be $255,492 (60.4%) .

So in this case, a $5000 "raise", would really result in a net loss of around $16,000.

Hope this helps
Posted by jdeval1
Member since Dec 2009
7525 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

This is probably single income

Talking about Pecker's calculator on pg 1
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61593 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

418,000 is in 35% tax bracket. This would mean 271,700 (65%) would be take home pay.
no... no it wouldn't.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91874 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

418,000 is in 35% tax bracket. This would mean 271,700 (65%) would be take home pay. Let's say this person received a $5k raise bringing salary to $423,000 which is in 39.6% bracket. Take home pay would then be $255,492 (60.4%) . So in this case, a $5000 "raise", would really result in a net loss of around $16,000. Hope this helps


This level of commitment makes me believe you're trolling, but then again, most posters come up with the wrong answer in that math thread on the board right now.
Posted by GEAUXT
Member since Nov 2007
30619 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Easy.

418,000 is in 35% tax bracket. This would mean 271,700 (65%) would be take home pay.

Let's say this person received a $5k raise bringing salary to $423,000 which is in 39.6% bracket. Take home pay would then be $255,492 (60.4%) .

So in this case, a $5000 "raise", would really result in a net loss of around $16,000.

Hope this helps



holy shite, you're serious
Posted by Sterling Archer
Member since Aug 2012
8472 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 3:53 pm to
WRONG holy shite dude

Not all of your income is taxed at the higher rate.

Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41903 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:04 pm to
He's just trolling.
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
26353 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:11 pm to
35% $416,700 to $418,400 $120,910.25 plus 35% of the amount over $416,700
39.6% $418,400 or more $121,505.25 plus 39.6% of the amount over $418,400
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46710 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:35 pm to
Cool calculator, but the damn thing didn't even have the Columbia metro area for South Carolina.

how the frick do you forget to include the damn state capitol region?

I just put in Charleston. I'm only in the top 5%
Posted by sneakytiger
Member since Oct 2007
2508 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:42 pm to
C'mon guy, every man should understand how his earnings are taxed.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
19724 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:53 pm to
Your explanation is eerily similar to that wondrous thread on fuel mileage! Best thread ever. Many here should remember.
Posted by TigersSEC2010
Warren, Michigan
Member since Jan 2010
38535 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:55 pm to
Not even on the chart yet
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40997 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 5:43 pm to
How have you liked it?

Kinda scary to go from being a profit center to a cost center.
Posted by crazycubes
Member since Jan 2016
5256 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 6:07 pm to
Don't really give a shite about top 1%, just want to catch my next flight at Signature Flight Support, Odessy Aviation, etc.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram