- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Audit says EBR Council on Aging may have broken state, federal election laws
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:53 pm to Jim Smith
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:53 pm to Jim Smith
quote:
Does anybody here really believe that Gravy hasn't eaten since Saturday???
Looks like some of you may have gotten in his head, so he's now trying to be Gravy Lite....Yeah, that'll happen.
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:55 pm to tke857
Is anyone surprised by the level of malfeasance in EBR government? Take a look at the landscape of director-level leadership all the way up to the mayor. If you think this is isolated, you're kidding yourself.
The victim is the taxpayer, but hey, at least they can't call use racists. Oh, wait...
The victim is the taxpayer, but hey, at least they can't call use racists. Oh, wait...
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:59 pm to MajorMacD
quote:
Is anyone surprised by the level of malfeasance in EBR government? Take a look at the landscape of director-level leadership all the way up to the mayor. If you think this is isolated, you're kidding yourself.
The victim is the taxpayer, but hey, at least they can't call use racists. Oh, wait...
The only redeeming part about this constant stream of controversy is that it will likely get the attention of some local federal agencies who might set up some sting operations to bust these corrupt people. We already know we can't rely on city or state officials to do it.
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:17 pm to BilJ
quote:
solid deflection attempt there c denise
If you want to see why EBRSO isn't looking into this crime or why EBRSO is never mentioned in C Denise's or Broome or Ted James law enforcement reform agenda, just look at the last few campaign finance reports from the sheriff.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/8/17 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:24 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
If you want to see why EBRSO isn't looking into this crime or why EBRSO is never mentioned in C Denise's or Broome or Ted James law enforcement reform agenda, just look at the last few campaign finance reports from the sheriff.
BRPD won't play ball and give these crooks money so of course SWB and th others want him out.
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:34 pm to rowbear1922
quote:
BRPD won't play ball and give these crooks money
BRPD is civil service, therefore can't give any money to political candidates. Maybe this is the real reason why they are trying to get rid of BRPD's civil service system
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:43 pm to SPEEDY
quote:well im not going to look but are there the same contributions to the other candidate?
If you want to see why EBRSO isn't looking into this crime or why EBRSO is never mentioned in C Denise's or Broome or Ted James law enforcement reform agenda, just look at the last few campaign finance reports from the sheriff.
This COULD be the case, it happens alot in these crooked systems of government. You wont get any work if you are a consultant or contractor unless you contribute to these campaigns. So companies donate 1 or 2 k to both sides.
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:47 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
well im not going to look but are there the same contributions to the other candidate?
I posted some screen caps
No contributions to the other candidates
This post was edited on 5/8/17 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:51 pm to SPEEDY
right but did Broome and the other also donate to Sid opponent? if so, then there is nothing to see other than Sid is pandering to the people who gives him money. Which every elected official does right or wrong.
What i think is completely wrong yet is very legal, is how these guys campaign fund account are transitions to their personal accounts when they "retire" from politics. It is hoe the Clinton's, Kennedy's and all these small town sheriffs and politicians have a good bit of money after a few years of office.
What i think is completely wrong yet is very legal, is how these guys campaign fund account are transitions to their personal accounts when they "retire" from politics. It is hoe the Clinton's, Kennedy's and all these small town sheriffs and politicians have a good bit of money after a few years of office.
This post was edited on 5/8/17 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:53 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
right but did Broome and the other also donate to Sid opponent? if so, then there is nothing to see other than Sid is pandering to the people who gives him money. Which every elected official does right or wrong.
quote:
No contributions to the other candidates
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:56 pm to drewnbrla
quote:oh STFU. that was an ETA.
quote:
No contributions to the other candidates
That is Sid contribution report, is his opponents account listed on that site?
Im not taking up for any of these crooks, im just says political campaign donations could show them being impartial.
Posted on 5/8/17 at 4:59 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
oh STFU. that was an ETA.
Didn't see the "ETA". Settle down nancy.
quote:
That is Sid contribution report, is his opponents account listed on that site?
No. Only quoting what he stated in his post
quote:
Im not taking up for any of these crooks, im just says political campaign donations could show them being impartial.
Never said you were or alluded to it. In fact, I agree with you. Candidates always donate to both sides so they can have favor despite who was elected.
Posted on 5/8/17 at 5:00 pm to CarRamrod
I don't blame Sid one bit. It's smart on his part because he keeps that group out of his business and keeps their focus on BRPD.
Posted on 5/8/17 at 5:03 pm to SPEEDY
Nak is going at these crooks right now
Posted on 5/8/17 at 5:04 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
What i think is completely wrong yet is very legal, is how these guys campaign fund account are transitions to their personal accounts when they "retire" from politics.
I don't think it gets to go directly to their personal accounts. I think they get to use it for a lot of charity events, campaign contributions, golf tournaments and probably pay themselves and their kids a salary as administrators.
Wait that is basically a personal account!
Posted on 5/8/17 at 5:17 pm to lsu13lsu
quote:
I don't think it gets to go directly to their personal accounts. I think they get to use it for a lot of charity events, campaign contributions, golf tournaments and probably pay themselves and their kids a salary as administrators.
Or just start a "foundation" and pay your children near $1M and never actually help those the "foundation" were said to help...
Posted on 5/8/17 at 5:20 pm to rowbear1922
quote:
Or just start a "foundation" and pay your children near $1M and never actually help those the "foundation" were said to help...
I hear bingo halls do very well also.
Posted on 5/8/17 at 5:23 pm to drewnbrla
quote:
I hear bingo halls do very well also.
Especially after you shut them down so quickly....easy way to launder $300k
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:00 am to rowbear1922
and Tarsha just filed a Temporary Restraining Order through the city court to make everyone stop picking on her.
LINK
Surprised Nak wasn't named in the TRO
LINK
quote:
In the meantime, Smith signed an order May 1 that prevents the Plummer family from "abusing, harassing, threatening or molesting" Amar or "interfering in any manner" with Amar's employment. Additionally, the order says the family cannot go to Amar's residence or workplace.
Surprised Nak wasn't named in the TRO
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:06 am to meauxjeaux2
quote:
interfering in any manner" with Amar's employment.
"You can't fire me because I filed a restraining order that says anything the family I swindled did can't affect my employment"
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News