- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Armed robber was never told to report to prison
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:53 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:53 pm to Byron Bojangles III
X amount of time away from your crime does not excuse his crime.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:54 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
Also, was a SWAT team in full gear really necessary to go pick him up?
SWAT teams are necessary for everything. How else are all the wannabes gonna get to play dress up with all their cool shite and pretend to be Seal Team 6.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:56 pm to AUCE05
Why do you want to pay for this dude to live for 13 years? He's supporting himself and his family legally, not leaching.
ALL convicts are leaches, they are not sentenced to hard labor anymore. They lay around get fed, housed, and medical care for free.
ALL convicts are leaches, they are not sentenced to hard labor anymore. They lay around get fed, housed, and medical care for free.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:57 pm to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
quote:
Why do you want to pay for this dude to live for 13 years? He's supporting himself and his family legally, not leaching.
ALL convicts are leaches, they are not sentenced to hard labor anymore. They lay around get fed, housed, and medical care for free.
Following that logic, why imprison anyone that has a job?
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:57 pm to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
and sex whenever they want! (and or don't want)
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:57 pm to AUCE05
quote:
X amount of time away from your crime does not excuse his crime
In the eyes of the law it often does through statutory limits.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:58 pm to Byron Bojangles III
It's a tough one, but why didn't he call the state to confirm or whatevs.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:58 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
It's a tough one, but why didn't he call the state to confirm or whatevs.
How many people would actually do that?
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:59 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Didn't read through all of the commments. My vote is to have this guy do a lot of community service or something.
Missouri fricked up....but if he has really turned his life around....why send him to jail?
Missouri fricked up....but if he has really turned his life around....why send him to jail?
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:59 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Following that logic, why imprison anyone that has a job?
Well obviously this dude's situation is not the standard. So why treat him like the standard.
He is rehabilitated, what's the point of incarcerating him?
On the point of incarcerating anyone? I could write all fricking day about what convicts should be doing instead of lying around all day, but that's for another time.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:59 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
It's a tough one, but why didn't he call the state to confirm or whatevs.
quote:
How many people would actually do that?
Dumb ones
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:00 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
why didn't he call the state to confirm or whatevs.
His attorney advised him not to.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:00 pm to Jcorye1
quote:what retard would do this? the state should do their job not make others do their job for them.
It's a tough one, but why didn't he call the state to confirm or whatevs.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:01 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Suck's for him. Kudos on turning his life around.
He still committed armed robbery.
He still committed armed robbery.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:01 pm to C
quote:
His attorney advised him not to.
Sounds like a smart guy.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:11 pm to Green Chili Tiger
The point of incarceration is twofold:
1. To rehabilitate the individual into becoming a productive member of society.
2. To prevent the individual from harming others.
Both occurred without the expense of taxpayers for 13 years. Everyone wins in this case, IMO.
1. To rehabilitate the individual into becoming a productive member of society.
2. To prevent the individual from harming others.
Both occurred without the expense of taxpayers for 13 years. Everyone wins in this case, IMO.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:12 pm to Golfer
quote:
Both occurred without the expense of taxpayers for 13 years.
So what's to stop some other convicted felon from saying "well that guy did just fine, I'll do that too?"
The DA has to put the guy in jail IMO, but the governor should pardon him right after.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:15 pm to Golfer
quote:
The point of incarceration is twofold:
1. To rehabilitate the individual into becoming a productive member of society.
2. To prevent the individual from harming others.
There's also an element of punishment involved as well. I definitely don't think he deserves the full 13 years, but I would be in favor of probation with a crap load of community service.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:15 pm to LNCHBOX
well this was a case where this happened by accident due to the mistake of the retards working for the state. Its pretty clear this isn't a issue that would be happening all the time to where it becomes a slippery slope. Also in that hypothetical situation the felon has no proof, while this guy has 13 years worth of proof that he has changed.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:15 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
So what's to stop some other convicted felon from saying "well that guy did just fine, I'll do that too?"
Huh?
I'm not advocating for all convicted felons to be released. I'm saying its pointless to put this guy in jail.
Popular
Back to top



2






