- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Armed robber was never told to report to prison
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:16 pm to LNCHBOX
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:16 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
the governor should pardon him right after
So, you think the armed robber should go unpunished, but you think the guy who stole $0.89 soda refills a few times needs to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Got it.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:16 pm to Golfer
You can't ignore the punishment aspect of incarceration.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:17 pm to Golfer
quote:
Huh?
I'm not advocating for all convicted felons to be released. I'm saying its pointless to put this guy in jail.
I'm aware you're not, but what I quoted from you is more than enough for a defense attorney to run with. I'm not saying I agree with it.
No sense in potentially opening a loophole when it can be handled within the confines of the system through a pardon.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:17 pm to medtiger
quote:
So, you think the armed robber should go unpunished, but you think the guy who stole $0.89 soda refills a few times needs to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Got it.
That's exactly what I said, word for word. Amazing.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:18 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
well this was a case where this happened by accident due to the mistake of the retards working for the state. Its pretty clear this isn't a issue that would be happening all the time to where it becomes a slippery slope. Also in that hypothetical situation the felon has no proof, while this guy has 13 years worth of proof that he has changed.
I know all this, but you know as well as a I do an attorney could run with it and convince 12 dumbass jurors.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:18 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
No sense in potentially opening a loophole
What loophole? If this guy doesn't go to jail, then the precedent set is if you get lost in the system for a time longer than your sentence, then you don't have to go to jail. Otherwise, you go to jail.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:19 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
That's exactly what I said, word for word. Amazing.
Just making sure I wasn't misinterpreting your thoughts. Thanks for confirming.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:19 pm to medtiger
quote:
What loophole?
quote:
if you get lost in the system for a time longer than your sentence, then you don't have to go to jail.
That is in fact a loophole out of serving your sentence.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:19 pm to medtiger
quote:Is that the threshold?
longer than your sentence
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:19 pm to medtiger
quote:
Just making sure I wasn't misinterpreting your thoughts. Thanks for confirming.
And I'm the idiot.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:20 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
well this was a case where this happened by accident due to the mistake of the retards working for the state. Its pretty clear this isn't a issue that would be happening all the time to where it becomes a slippery slope.
I am sure that with this complete frick up by the state, every case will be handled with the quickness now so I doubt many slippery slopes for a while in MoMo.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:20 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
And I'm the idiot.
That's what I'm taking from the two threads I've seen you post in today too.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:21 pm to medtiger
quote:
That's what I'm taking from the two threads I've seen you post in today too.
Terrific, why don't you make a thread about it and get out of this one?
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:21 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Is that the threshold?
That's the threshold that this case would set precedent for. If it had only been 5 years since his conviction and sentencing of 13 years, this really wouldn't be as big of a story. He'd be in jail serving his time.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:22 pm to LNCHBOX
Because a thread entitled "LNCHBOX is an idiot" would be really boring.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:22 pm to LNCHBOX
Like the overwhelming majority of Americans, I believe you lock their asses up so they don't commit more crimes.
This guy has stayed out of trouble and gotten his life straight and we're not supporting him or his family.
Turn him loose, IDGAF.
This guy has stayed out of trouble and gotten his life straight and we're not supporting him or his family.
Turn him loose, IDGAF.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:23 pm to medtiger
quote:
Because a thread entitled "LNCHBOX is an idiot" would be really boring.
You can take your lame personal attacks elsewhere. No one is laughing with you.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:23 pm to MWP
quote:Exactly. This isn't setting a precedent; it would just be making sure that it never happens again. I'm sure it will influence administrative procedures pretty heavily.
I am sure that with this complete frick up by the state, every case will be handled with the quickness now so I doubt many slippery slopes for a while in MoMo.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:25 pm to medtiger
What about 10 years on a 13 year sentence?
I don't want this case setting any sort of a precedent. It would be hurting the very people it's meant to protect.
I don't want this case setting any sort of a precedent. It would be hurting the very people it's meant to protect.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:25 pm to LNCHBOX
I'm not trying to make people laugh with me. I was trying to understand your reasoning in the two threads about criminals today. And, fwiw, I wasn't the one initiating personal attacks in this thread.
Popular
Back to top


1



