- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ark Encounter in Kentucky (mostly not travel-related)
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:47 pm to kywildcatfanone
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:47 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Lots of evidence of this. Open your mind just a tad.
You didn't actually read those stories, did you?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:48 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Lots of evidence of this.
There is no significant evidence that the entire world was flooded, as it is simply not possible.
There have been catastrophic floods all over the world throughout history, but there has certainly never been a flood that covered the entire world as long as humans have existed. Never happened.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:52 pm to kywildcatfanone
Per your own link.
That's a regional flood. Try again.
quote:
"It probably was a bad day," Ballard said. "At some magic moment, it broke through and flooded this place violently, and a lot of real estate, 150,000 square kilometers of land, went under."
That's a regional flood. Try again.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:53 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Lots of evidence of this. Open your mind just a tad.
Robert Ballard
The Guardian

Ouch. You didn't read those, did you?
There is ample evidence of a large scale regional flood of the Med into the Black sea. Which both articles reference. It would have felt like the whole world to 8000BC desert nomads.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:53 pm to BayouBlitz
First link I came to, you are welcome to go read the pages of evidence posted and confirmed by science and archeologists.
You are welcome to say it didn't happen, but there is evidence to support it. Believe what you want.
You are welcome to say it didn't happen, but there is evidence to support it. Believe what you want.
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:55 pm to kywildcatfanone
Both of those articles outline the same expedition which was specific to the area around the Black Sea.
Robert Ballard, who led the expedition even says this:
Robert Ballard, who led the expedition even says this:
quote:
But he does not claim to have found the landscape of Noah. " We really cannot say in any way, shape or form that this is the biblical flood. All we can say is that there has been a major flood, that people were living here when it happened.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:57 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
First link I came to, you are welcome to go read the pages of evidence posted and confirmed by science and archeologists.
You are welcome to say it didn't happen, but there is evidence to support it. Believe what you want.
Jesus you aren't getting it are you.

Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:58 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
kywildcatfanone
Again, you're not reading carefully. Those articles do not support the statement that you made about there being evidence of the world flooding.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:59 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
you are welcome to go
quote:
You are welcome to say
Never felt so welcome before.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:01 pm to Mo Jeaux
Right, they specifically reference the Med/Black Sea flood (which has often been theorized as a possible basis for the Noah Flood legend), which does have some evidence to back it up, and would seem like a "worldwide" event to illiterate desert nomads living directly in the region.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:17 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
You didn't actually read those stories, did you?
I'm sure he gave that Guardian article a once over when it was released.... in 2000

Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:17 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
You do know 40 days and nights wouldn't come close to covering the globe, as per the Bible.
You have to consider that the largest impact for flooding would be the initial eruption of steam and water. That water would settle immediately above the crust, rather than having been trapped below it. Envision an a massive tsunami, or the tidal surge of a Cat 5.
Then as the plates shifted, hills and mountains rose from the abyss. One of which the ark settled on. The flooding was a combination of the Earths crust dropping, to fill in where the water vacated. Think global sinkhole. And the non-stop raining from steam being released into the atmosphere. There was no place for the rains to run-off to. Because the lowest areas were already filled with the initial rising waters
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:20 pm to RobbBobb
Wait. You're a Biblical Literalist?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:21 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Wait. You're a Biblical Literalist?
Ask him about demonic possession.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:23 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:But it’s ok to take them to church
No parent of any worth should take their kids to something like this absolute nonsense.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:29 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Ask him about demonic possession.
Is RobbBobb a Bijon alter?????
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:29 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
You have to consider that the largest impact for flooding would be the initial eruption of steam and water. That water would settle immediately above the crust, rather than having been trapped below it. Envision an a massive tsunami, or the tidal surge of a Cat 5.
Then as the plates shifted, hills and mountains rose from the abyss. One of which the ark settled on. The flooding was a combination of the Earths crust dropping, to fill in where the water vacated. Think global sinkhole. And the non-stop raining from steam being released into the atmosphere. There was no place for the rains to run-off to. Because the lowest areas were already filled with the initial rising waters
L
O
L
Popular
Back to top
