Started By
Message

re: Are realtor's really worth 5-6% commission?

Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:18 am to
Posted by eScott
Member since Oct 2008
11376 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:18 am to
No. The "top" realtors are married to contractors. They'll show your house, then take them to their husband's houses and tell the buyer they can have a new house for the same price or a little more.

I've always had better experience by owner.
This post was edited on 6/5/19 at 8:26 am
Posted by redneck
Los Suenos, Costa Rica
Member since Dec 2003
54201 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:18 am to
The wife and I waited until our late 20's to purchase our first house rather than a starter home right after marriage so I don't plan on selling anytime soon but when we do I'll gladly pay a realtor to not have to deal with all the bullshite offers, questions, and viewings.
Posted by PortHudsonPlaya
Houston
Member since Jul 2017
3170 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:22 am to
They are really worthless with all the online tools out there now. I’m actually shocked that realtors and realty companies are still a thing.
Posted by Supermoto Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2010
10966 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:39 am to
quote:

It would be more interesting if they listed their commission amount as number rather than a percentage.

It is a number. The number is the percentage of the contract price.
Posted by Supermoto Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2010
10966 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:54 am to
quote:

I'm paying 4.5% for my house that's currently listed. I plan on negotiating down further once the inevitable low offers come in

Get ready for the law suit....you signed a legal contract and agreed to pay 4.5%.

It would be like a Buyer writing a contract on your house for 300K and you agree to it. Then, when they are at the closing table, the Buyer decides to reduce their contract by 10K and tells you they'll only pay 290K. With your reasoning, a "good" Seller will give up the 10K to get the house sold.

Come on man.
Posted by terriblegreen
Spokane, LA
Member since Aug 2011
12453 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 9:02 am to
It's a buyers market right now. So if you don't get a realtor you are going to pay for it one way or another.
Posted by Day Man
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
1227 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 9:11 am to
quote:

A good agent will give up all/some of the commission to get a house sold, with the understanding they will make more when you buy.


quote:

What kind of retarded answer is this?


My thoughts exactly. If anything the opposite is true, I could understand why a shitty agent would work for free. No one who is good at their job will or should do it for free. If you know you're good at what you do then you know how valuable your time is and how valuable your service is. Why would someone like that work for free for some know-it-all that thinks he can do your job better than you.

For the record, I'm not a real estate agent, but people who make a deal with the intention of renegotiating after the work has been done or who expect something for free are assholes.
Posted by GreyWhiskers
St. Tammany
Member since Nov 2018
913 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 9:13 am to
My family hired an agent to sell my mom’s house who died last year and I have to say it was a good move on our part, because none of my siblings wanted to deal with it.
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32611 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 9:22 am to
TJG is
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
23221 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 9:23 am to

It must be a cash cow.

It's the only industry I see with those creepy husband and wife glamour shot billboards. That and evangelists.

The woman is almost always an 8+ and the husband's a toad.





This post was edited on 6/5/19 at 9:24 am
Posted by Areddishfish
The Wild West
Member since Oct 2015
6538 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Are realtor's really worth 5-6% commission?


As a seller you'd have to consider this. I know when I was much younger my mom sold our house by owner. She was really frugal and didn't want us to pay the extra commission fees. It kind of irked the realtor we used to find us a house but we lived in a very good neighborhood and within two weeks it was sold and used to buy the next house in cash. The buyer also was going without a realtor so it made the closing process much easier. That was back in the early 00s. As a buyer, I don't know why you'd not want to use one. Tons of paperwork involved and our realtor helped stream line the process. She also helped us get extra that I never would have thought about asking for. If our family doesn't extend beyond 2 kids we will probably stay put and just update as we go. We don't really want to move again unless we go out of state. We would like to move to western North Carolina at some point.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:11 am to
5-6% across the board is pretty tough to justify.

Ultimately I'd argue the buyer is paying the commission either way. However, sellers create the inventory which is still mostly listed through traditional realtors. The industry will probably be disrupted on a large scale in the near future, and there are a few different models that are picking up traction.

At the end of the day, the decision should come down to how much is your time as a buyer/seller worth.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61693 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:11 am to
quote:

you put your house up for sale a FSBO and it doesn't sell in 5 months vs the realtor sells it in 1, then yes. What kind of question is this?
you have a 400k house? You can get a whole lot of interest w 24k to play with.

Decorating allowances and the like can be real attractive.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Under 100,0000 yes. 650,000 no.


It's all relative. In all likelihood, the value of a $650k homeowner's time is greater than a $125k homeowner's time.
Posted by Vood
Member since Dec 2007
8623 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 10:20 am to
If you have gone through a tough sell for whatever reason, then a good agent is worth every penny. If it was a quick sell then no. The problem is you never know what type of sell you are going to get from the start.

Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
3337 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Get ready for the law suit....you signed a legal contract and agreed to pay 4.5%.

It would be like a Buyer writing a contract on your house for 300K and you agree to it. Then, when they are at the closing table, the Buyer decides to reduce their contract by 10K and tells you they'll only pay 290K. With your reasoning, a "good" Seller will give up the 10K to get the house sold.

Come on man.


Some of y'all aren't capable of following simple logic. Yes, I signed a contract at 4.5%. The realtor, however, gets zero if the house doesn't sell. If my bottom dollar is $200k, and the offer is $197k....it then becomes in the best interest of both agents to lower their commission to get the deal done. No, you can't force them. Work with an agent who isn't so stupid as to not close a deal like that.
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
3337 posts
Posted on 6/5/19 at 12:53 pm to
quote:


What kind of retarded answer is this?


I guess one that you can't comprehend? Commission is negotiable before you sign a listing contract. Further, when negotiating, you can negotiate selling price and use agent commission (on one or both sides) to close the gap on an offer that's less than ideal.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram