- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Apple to Analyze Recovered iPhone of Florida Teens Lost at Sea
Posted on 5/1/16 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 5/1/16 at 12:53 pm
quote:
Apple has agreed to examine a recovered iPhone at the center of a dispute between the families of two Florida teens who went missing during a fishing trip last summer (via ABC News).
In July 2015, 14-year-old Austin Stephanos and his friend and neighbor Perry Cohen, also 14, launched a single-engine vessel on a fishing expedition off the coast of Palm Beach County, Florida. The boys never returned, and despite a Coast Guard-led eight-day search of the Atlantic covering 50,000 nautical miles, their bodies were never found.
Last month, their abandoned boat was discovered by a Norwegian crew 100 miles off the coast of Bermuda, along with a locked box inside of which was Stephanos' heavily water-damaged and inoperable iPhone 6.
Cohen had borrowed Stephanos' phone to communicate with his family the day they disappeared, and the Cohens wanted the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to treat the phone as evidence in an open missing persons case, but the agency insisted on returning the phone to Stephanos' family, according to a local television report.
Cohen's mother, Pamela Cohen, sued Stephanos' family to have the iPhone returned to the state, to allow her access to its contents, and if necessary, have the phone turned over to law enforcement as evidence in a possible criminal investigation.
LINK
Posted on 5/1/16 at 12:59 pm to Street Hawk
quote:
Cohen's mother, Pamela Cohen, sued Stephanos' family to have the iPhone returned to the state, to allow her access to its contents, and if necessary, have the phone turned over to law enforcement as evidence in a possible criminal investigation.
Sounds like she's handling this well.
Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:02 pm to Yellerhammer5
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/1/16 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:07 pm to Street Hawk
Damn. I hope one of their friends can delete their search history first.
Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:12 pm to Street Hawk
I wonder what Apple means by 'examine'? Surely they won't get through the passcode if they wouldn't help with the terrorist.
Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:16 pm to dred24
quote:
I wonder what Apple means by 'examine'? Surely they won't get through the passcode if they wouldn't help with the terrorist.
They can certainly recover data. I think the issue with the terrorist's phone was that some agent changed the passcode and that did something where they wouldn't unlock it. The parents technically own that phone so there is no reason why they shouldn't find any data and give it to the parents.
Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:17 pm to dred24
quote:
I wonder what Apple means by 'examine'? Surely they won't get through the passcode if they wouldn't help with the terrorist.

Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:27 pm to ChatRabbit77
It is interesting how apple jumps to help on this but not legit terrorism.
I am all for apple protecting privacy but they chose a shitty situation to make a point of it.
I am all for apple protecting privacy but they chose a shitty situation to make a point of it.
Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:45 pm to ChatRabbit77
quote:
They can certainly recover data. I think the issue with the terrorist's phone was that some agent changed the passcode and that did something where they wouldn't unlock it.
No. Just... no.
Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:47 pm to Street Hawk
So is the phone inoperable or not? If it is inoperable they won't be able to get to its contents. If they can, don't call it inoperable.
That is all.
That is all.
Posted on 5/1/16 at 1:47 pm to Cosmo
quote:
I am all for apple protecting privacy but they chose a shitty situation to make a point of it.
Consider the boys weren't adults and the parents can still supply consent.
Posted on 5/1/16 at 2:09 pm to shutterspeed
quote:
Consider the boys weren't adults and the parents can still supply consent.
I was talking about the terrorist thing
But in this case are the boys not entitled to their privacy even though underage? The parents might own the phone but do they own the thoughts/content on there?
A 15 year old girl can get an abortion/birth control without her parents consent but the "private" contents of a phone are fair game?
This post was edited on 5/1/16 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 5/1/16 at 2:16 pm to Cosmo
Cosmo, are you sure the scenario is the same? Nobody's fricked up the phone by putting in wrong passwords? Apple is just being hypocritical ..?
Posted on 5/1/16 at 2:19 pm to Cosmo
Under the assumption the parents own the phone, I would say they have every right to have apple attempt to do this and that it is in no way shape or form the same as the terrorist situation.
Civil liberties and parenting are two different issues altogether.
Civil liberties and parenting are two different issues altogether.
This post was edited on 5/1/16 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 5/1/16 at 2:45 pm to Street Hawk
If I'm ever found dead, I hope Apple doesn't unlock my iphone for my parents.
Eta: english
Eta: english
This post was edited on 5/1/16 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 5/1/16 at 2:49 pm to tigeralum06
I think you mean "when" you're found dead.
Eta: do you speak it, motherfricker?
Eta: do you speak it, motherfricker?
This post was edited on 5/1/16 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 5/1/16 at 2:59 pm to Honest Tune
Not to get too deep into semantics but not all who die are "found dead". Some deaths are witnessed (as in an ER) as they happen in real time.
I freely grant you (what I believe to be) your intended point that everyone dies.
So one could die and not be found dead (until a court or other legal authority adjudicates them to be dead). Even then they're not "found" dead or to be dead, they are more correctly ruled to be dead.
I freely grant you (what I believe to be) your intended point that everyone dies.
So one could die and not be found dead (until a court or other legal authority adjudicates them to be dead). Even then they're not "found" dead or to be dead, they are more correctly ruled to be dead.
This post was edited on 5/1/16 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 5/1/16 at 3:03 pm to soccerfüt
I agree with everything you just typed. I just happen to know tigeralum06 in the "real" world and was fricking with him.
Popular
Back to top


6










