Started By
Message

re: anyone else sick of pride month?

Posted on 6/15/19 at 1:56 pm to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

He’s attempting to draw comparisons so as to validate his view that mental illness isn’t a mental illness.


Pathetic

Again y’all wonder why the coasts look down on the south. It’s shite like this. So fricking backward, it’s like talking to a caveman.
This post was edited on 6/15/19 at 1:58 pm
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33964 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:00 pm to
I forgot it was pride month until you brought it up.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
18155 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Most of the people that seem to be triggered at every turn are the ones laughing and poking fun at all the people that get triggered so easily.




You’re right, I don’t know why people think this is something to be alarmed about. It’s perfectly normal.


Posted by Mr Perfect
Member since Mar 2010
17836 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Saying people are made gay, so it should be accepted is like saying people are born to be attracted to children, so it should be accepted.





imagine being this dumb
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:03 pm to
If both people are over 18 then what the frick do you care what they do? Why would you want the government to sanction some social contracts but not others, picking and choosing who should be afforded legal protections and who should not?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60087 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:04 pm to
It’s sad that we’re still at a point in society where all you repressed gays that defend gays can’t come out the closet
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
18155 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

quote: But it is a mental illness.
Wow
quote: is like saying people are born to be attracted to children, so it should be accepted.
Is it? The whole victimizing minors thing isn’t a big enough difference?


What do you mean wow? I mean do you assume this is normal?

But they love each other, and you can’t get in the way of love now child. You’ll be labeled a bigot and you don’t want that do you?
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33964 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

You’re right, I don’t know why people think this is something to be alarmed about. It’s perfectly normal.


My thing is it's not new, at all. The free expression of it is.

Cross dressing, gender dysmorphia all go back thousands of years. It's not like people just decided to start behaving a certain way.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
18155 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Pathetic Again y’all wonder why the coasts look down on the south. It’s shite like this. So fricking backward, it’s like talking to a caveman.


Because the moral compasses of America lie on the coasts.
On the east coast, their leaders are demanding that the way of life as we know it be completely changed because the world is supposedly going to end in a few years.
On the west coast the major cities are spending millions cleaning their shite covered streets, and they’re giving free healthcare and schooling to people who aren’t even citizens..

And you tell me that these areas look down upon people like me.... lmao!
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
18155 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

quote: Saying people are made gay, so it should be accepted is like saying people are born to be attracted to children, so it should be accepted. imagine being this dumb


Explain the difference
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31129 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Weak, insecure people seek collectivism. Pride month is just another bastion of collectivism.


You need a better attack than collectivism. Anyone that considers collectivism wrong on its face is displaying weak cognitive skills. Simply consider US history without collectivism and see where we would be.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:16 pm to
quote:


It’s sad that we’re still at a point in society where all you repressed gays that defend gays can’t come out the closet



History actually shows that it’s those who attack gays who are most likely to be gay themselves and just can’t cope with it.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
18155 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

If both people are over 18 then what the frick do you care what they do? Why would you want the government to sanction some social contracts but not others, picking and choosing who should be afforded legal protections and who should not?


I don’t want the government to have their hands in anything private. Marriage has always be the unionization of two people in holy matrimony. The government shouldn’t have a damn say so. It’s not in their power to decide such things. Yet here we are. They have decided to completely rewrite what marriage is on the basis of being politically correct.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60087 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:17 pm to
Funny y’all try to use history to defend something that was invented in the 70s
This post was edited on 6/15/19 at 2:18 pm
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
18155 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

My thing is it's not new, at all. The free expression of it is. Cross dressing, gender dysmorphia all go back thousands of years. It's not like people just decided to start behaving a certain way.


I mean yeah, it’s talked about in the Bible. But the fact that it is happening doesn’t make it understandable and acceptable.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

The government shouldn’t have a damn say so.


Okay but you understand there are tax benefits, visitation rights, etc that come with marriage in this country, right? Do you want the government to decide who is or is not worthy of such?
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
18155 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Okay but you understand there are tax benefits, visitation rights, etc that come with marriage in this country, right? Do you want the government to decide who is or is not worthy of such?


No, the government shouldn’t be in the business of picking winners and losers.

In my opinion we should all pay a flat tax of 10%. Make the tax code as simple as possible.
This post was edited on 6/15/19 at 2:36 pm
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 2:49 pm to
Maybe this is why gays are still having to keep their cause in the news: 'They are worthy of death’: A cop preached that the government should execute LGBTQ people

quote:

“I’m sick of sodomy getting crammed down our throats,” Fritts said at one point in the video, drawing attention to Taylor Swift’s recent efforts to fight anti-LGBTQ bills going through Tennessee’s state legislature.


Why do they use this terminology so often?
This post was edited on 6/15/19 at 2:56 pm
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72193 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 12:35 am to
quote:

Asides from it being a sin, which should be enough to try and distance yourself from it, it is a mental illness. We are essentially saying that mental illness is perfectly fine, and that no matter what the implications of its acceptance are we are to accept it blindly. I said back when gay marriage was made constitutional that a Pandora’s box had been opened. The argument of the lgbtqrstuv crowd was that you can’t legislate love. Well that is an incredibly stupid argument. The concept of marriage as we have come to know it is not simply based on love. It is based in the Judeo-Christian concept of it being a Holy Matrimony that was more spiritual then physical. The idea that marriage is based on love alone is stupid in another way as well. If marriage is simply based on love, then we are inevitably going to have to acknowledge the marriage of others as well. Including those who “love” trees. They’re called ecosexuals. This is nothing more than the normalization of mental illness. And it has had consequences, and will continue to have consequences. We are already seeing the rise in those calling for the acceptance of pedophiles on the basis that was used for the acceptance of gay marriage; you can’t legislate love. We are to accept them simply because they have love.


Why is it a mental illness as opposed to just simply being wired differently? There are a lot of gay people who are successful, happy, and major contributors to society. Many contribute more than you and I combined. What specifically makes them mentally ill if they can function in this manner?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram