re: Annual JonBenet Ramsey Theories Thread

It was pretty comical how they went all in on the basement window and the suitcase claiming it had to be an intruder because John said the suitcase didn’t belong there.

quote:

---

again as a complete noob here....how does any of this prove on insinuate he killed her? he could very well have fixed bowl, even fed her. doesn't mean anything outside of that happened

---

1) because both parents testified she was asleep when they got home and took her strait to bed

AND

2) it places her and Burke (awake) together immediately prior to her death.

You’re welcome.

I think Burke hit her with the flashlight at about the time she eating the pineapple. Parents freaked and went overkill to save their son's future. Ransom note was written by Patsy. They didn't cooperate with police.

Many years ago, my wife’s friend that was a real psychic,( helped police find missing kids etc, until big fallout with CIA over a now public scandal incident, didn’t do for money), had nightmares about a little blonde girl being molested and killed by a man in a Santa suit repeatedly for about 6 months before this happen. When it was in the news she said she was the girl in her dreams.

She was right about everything else so I would bet 100k on she was killed by a man in a Santa suit.

quote:

---

True Crime garage completely blew this story. They have little understanding of DNA vs. touch DNA. and the reporting was Biased from the onset. the reason there was NO intruder DNA is because there was no intruder. All the DNA in that house belonged to the family (as it would, of course)

If you want a better understanding of the case, in greater detail, by someone involved with the case. Foreign Faction by A. James Kolar. I've read several, his was the 'light bulb' for me.

Burke did it. He had previous history of violence against his sister, including an assault with a golf club the year before. He's smear his shite all over her toys and gifts. He left a giant poop in her bed. I think he is likely autistic. The Grand Jury voted unanimously to press charges against the family for covering up the crime, altering the crime scene, false statements, etc.. The DA refused to bring charges in spite of the GJ recommendation. They figured he was only 9 at the time, there is no perp at large that would threaten the community, and the family had suffered enough.

All signs point to Burke. That DNA found on JB's underwear was so miniscule they initially didn't have enough to even put it in the database (if memory serves, only like 9 markers). By comparison the DNA services like Ancestry test over 7,000. The touch DNA literally could have been from whomever packed her underwear into the packaging in China and entirely irrelevant to the case. It keeps getting floated out there by the family whenever someone starts sniffing around Burke again.

---

This is a interesting thread and it's been a fun read. I never really followed this case.

There's alot to potentially respond to so I'm just gonna stick with your take. It's a good one.

The scatolia (playing in one's feces) is often associated with developmental delays and/or sexual trauma. There's a good chance that Burke was sexually abused. I wonder if that was ever explored?

Did the Ramsey's ever donate to the DA's campaign or have any influential connections who could've held sway with the DA?

Now there are some other things that have been touched on in this thread and couple of them, I think can be explained.

For instance.

Why wouldn't Burke's finger prints be on the bowl of pineapple? It's reasonably possible that at some point in the day Burke reached for a bowl to feed himself something, thought differently and simply put the bowl back, only to be used by Jean Benet many hours later.

Also, someone stated it didn't make sense for an intruder to hide in the house 45 minutes or longer, waiting to kill the child. Why does that not make sense? It's a gargantuan house and a very easy place to hide and wait.

Here are my most important facts:

1. There is almost no significant evidence or even a motive/plan for an intruder that makes sense.
2. Everything about the note and ransom makes no sense.
3. The family contaminated the crime scene and so did the police.

Can someone help me understand the intruder theory?

A guy wanted to kill her (with objects from the home) over a period of several hours in her house, write a ransom note from items in the home, and then leave the body in a location that only the father could find it (not the police).

Makes no sense at all.

quote:

---

I think Burke hit her with the flashlight at about the time she eating the pineapple.

---

Careful, he made CBS pay out the arse for such speculation.

My DNA expertise is just barely above zero, and I know enough about its testing to make a fool of myself, but I feel that DNA tech will be able to trace us all in the future. I also feel that in the future Big Brother's world, test results can and will be cross-referenced.

Somewhere, the donor of the DNA in her underwear could possibly be identified if he ever has a test done.

I know of at least two families that have been wrecked over DNA test results.

quote:

---

unknown DNA was such a tiny portion of a minuscule amount it could have come from touching an article of clothing. Not significant in anyway except for the family to keep fanning conspiracy theory’s each year.

---

There was also unknown male DNA found under her fingernails which is a bit harder to explain away.