- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:37 am to HueyLongJr
f u for vagueposting. go back to twitter
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:39 pm to dallastigers
quote:
So let’s just settle this. Were you justifying the doxxing of libsoftiktok?
If not why did you respond in a manner that would make a reasonable person believe that you were justifying it?
Keep stretching.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:43 pm to jnethe1
quote:
What she said concerning lsu was not in any way untrue. They did not go out for the national anthem, and that is indeed true.
Correct.
Also true is that I was not on the court for the anthem.
It was deception, plain and simple. A responsible journalist would have contacted LSU and asked some questions, then realized it was a nonstory.
Libsoftiktok is just a monkey throwing her own shite at people.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:04 pm to wadewilson
quote:
You started up on her in response to my post mentioning how she was doxxed and harassed by the left almost like what happened to her was justified. It wasn’t explicit. I wrote something bad happened to her (doxxing & harassment), and then you brought up negative things about her including her spreading hate in your reply.
My comment:quote:
The left has been doing this for years just over political differences. Besides an example like libsoftiktok just searching part of your post brought up many examples including at universities.
It’s often followed by threats of violence and calls to harass the person doxxed and their families just over those political differences.
Your response to my comment:quote:quote:
libsoftiktok
You know she's attacked LSU in the past, right?
She doesn't research what she's talking about, she just spreads hate.
So let’s just settle this. Were you justifying the doxxing of libsoftiktok?
If not why did you respond in a manner that would make a reasonable person believe that you were justifying it?
Your answer:
quote:
Keep stretching.
Why did you attempt to justify or minimize the doxxing and harassment of libsoftiktok?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:57 pm to dallastigers
quote:
Why did you attempt to justify or minimize the doxxing and harassment of libsoftiktok?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 2:01 pm to wadewilson
I didnt read the thread. Just here to post remind everyone that im an atheist and I hate libtards. You dont need Jesus to see faggy bullshite theories.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 3/16/26 at 4:07 pm to LSUballs
quote:
Says a terminally online person.
I only do it to entertain myself. I don't have any illusions that I'm an Important Person Doing Important Things Online. These people are one step up from TikTok influencers and they squabble amongst themselves just like TikTok influencers.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 5:08 pm to wadewilson
Why did you earlier avoid answering simple questions that were seeking clarification about your reply about libsoftiktok in response to a post that mentioned her getting doxxed and harassed?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:02 pm to dallastigers
quote:
Why did you earlier avoid answering simple questions that were seeking clarification about your reply about libsoftiktok in response to a post that mentioned her getting doxxed and harassed?
Because it was a bullshite question trying to force me to accept the strawman of myself that you constructed. The only appropriate response to that kind of dishonesty is mockery, so I'll give you another dose.
Posted on 3/17/26 at 6:48 am to dallastigers
quote:
Do you know what doxxing is? Or Did you think the LSU alumni kept his name hidden?
He used to want the publicity until this backfired. His username is his actual name on multiple social media accounts. His name was on the article that he doxxed this person in. He has “geaux tigers” on his public profile along with other LSU posts that were public before this backfired. LINK
Brad Duplessis was the only one doxxing in this situation.
What I meant was you would be fine if he doxxed a liberal.....
Posted on 3/17/26 at 7:16 am to wadewilson
quote:
She doesn't research what she's talking about, she just spreads hate.
quote:
by wadewilson
what a little bitch
Posted on 3/17/26 at 8:07 am to HueyLongJr
quote:
Apparently an LSU alumni
Your an embarrassment.
Posted on 3/17/26 at 8:18 am to danilo
quote:
So? Harvard’s alumni incudes Ted Kaczynski
LSU could only dream of having a great thinker like uncle ted as an alum
Posted on 3/17/26 at 11:53 am to Klark Kent
quote:
what a little bitch
quote:
Klark Kent
Yeah.
Posted on 3/17/26 at 1:45 pm to HueyLongJr
quote:alumnus (or alumna)
alumni
Perhaps you're the embarrassment.
Posted on 3/17/26 at 1:48 pm to mike4lsu
quote:
What I meant was you would be fine if he doxxed a liberal.....
But you responsed to the OP with:
quote:
Apparently an LSU alumni has doxxed a pseudonymous left-wing writer over political disagreements. This is morally upright behavior.
Regardless, you now making up what you think I would be fine with when using only political disagreements as the distinguishing characteristic is is just another bad attempt on your part.
Posted on 3/17/26 at 1:55 pm to wadewilson
quote:
she just spreads hate.
you're not wrong, but you're not right in the way you think you are right.
Posted on 3/17/26 at 2:06 pm to wadewilson
quote:quote:
Why did you earlier avoid answering simple questions that were seeking clarification about your reply about libsoftiktok in response to a post that mentioned her getting doxxed and harassed?
Because it was a bullshite question trying to force me to accept the strawman of myself that you constructed. The only appropriate response to that kind of dishonesty is mockery, so I'll give you another dose.
It was a legitimate question based on your response about libsoftiktok to my comment about her getting doxxed and harassed. It was just trying to find out why you singled her out to go negative on her when what I described was something negative that happened to her (and others but you went after her).
You are the only one who knows why chose to go negative on her replying to her getting doxxed and harassed, and now you are at 3 times coming up with some other BS reason to avoid answering.
You either meant to justify her doxxing and harassment or you did not, which could be easily explained by just not making a good enough attempt in reply to segue into a separate conversation about libsoftiktok making it just look like you were responding to her doxxing and harassment.
But answering seems beyond your capabilities on the subject for some reason.
Popular
Back to top


0





