Started By
Message

re: Americans Taxed $400 Billion For Fiber Optic Internet That Doesn’t Exist

Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:16 pm to
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:16 pm to
quote:


TL;DR: ISPs have stolen 400 billion from us and the assfricking has just begun.


muh trump
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:18 pm to
quote:



What's also bullshite is the major ISPs suing your local governments when they want to let new players into the market, or want to build out their own fiber networks that the ISPs refuse to do. Which they have done in many states.

Comcast sued (and lost, shockingly) when Chattanooga TN began building out their fiber network. 7 years later Comcast finally offers fiber in Chattanooga.


i'm still shocked that Chattanooga won
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113946 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

No one has answers, no one can recall anything, and nothing will get accomplished.



So basically the government running on par.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35319 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

Picking winners and losers, you bet. It's the epitome of what's wrong with the country


Which car manufacturer lost out on the loan Tesla and Musk received? The vast vast vast majority of "subsidies" for electric car purchases didn't actually go to tesla, but to consumers who decided to buy an electric car (any electric car, not just tesla).
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35319 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

45 Mbps in 1992 is laughable.....no where in America was that speed possible in 1992 or the world for that matter.....perhaps in some MIT lab or some crazy college that helped develop the web.

I have xfinity comcast and barely gwt that now.

Not sure how much I believe the article.


The plan was to rollout highspeed broadband to all americans within a certain timeframe (I think 10-12 years). Highspeed broadband was definied then as 45/45.

The fact that you barely get 45 now kinda proves the point of the article.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29761 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:25 pm to
I’ll be looking forward to the class action lawsuit verdict. My check for $1.13 will be justice served!
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84871 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 8:37 pm to
quote:


45 Mbps in 1992 is laughable.....no where in America was that speed possible in 1992 or the world for that matter.....perhaps in some MIT lab or some crazy college that helped develop the web.

I have xfinity comcast and barely gwt that now.

Not sure how much I believe the article.



That's what was promised by telecoms. The book the article references can be downloaded for free. Good stuff.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
7418 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:02 pm to
If you from what understand and know about how schools get and pay for internet the fact of 400 billion could be true about waste, but there are some things to consider about the internet.

The internet has always been seen as a type of subscription service. You pay x for y speed for z time. No where have I seen a place where you can pay x and get lifetime service. Someone is paying somewhere.

So I don’t know how a school or place could get free internet once they built their lines, so essentially the money or subsidies kept going back to the ISPs in a big circle jerk.

Also, schools get their costs for service based on the number of students on free lunch. One school’s internet bill could run in the thousands and be right by a fiber node (if it is in an affluent neighborhood, less kids on school lunch) and the cost to run the connection is minimal. On the other hand, another school in the hood several miles from a node and a wire had to be special run for that location could be just a few hundred because of subsidies (more kids on free lunch)

One school system I know built a fiber LAN (metro circuit) interconnecting the schools and central office and the WAN access was purchased for central office was then shared and monitored down to the schools where it could be purchased cheaper (closer to the central office days of pricing). I remember hearing horror stories about how there was never enough bandwidth to the internet.
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:23 pm to
I get LUS fiber next month in my neighborhood....I told Cox to go frick themselves twice this week after getting numerous texts that I was going over my data limit and need to buy more.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:29 pm to
quote:


Which car manufacturer lost out on the loan Tesla and Musk received? The vast vast vast majority of "subsidies" for electric car purchases didn't actually go to tesla, but to consumers who decided to buy an electric car (any electric car, not just tesla).



not to mention Musk petitioned to have the subsidies ended because it would benefit his company
Posted by jennyjones
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Apr 2006
9313 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 10:34 am to
quote:

So do I l, our government actually delivered and were the first ones to do it in America.


I have LUS Fiber (Lafayette, La) . It was delayed a couple of years by lawsuits from Att and Cox, but eventually got rolled out. It is pretty sweet
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57440 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 10:41 am to
quote:



I get gigabit speeds up and down at home


you do know that the greatest country in the world pays the most for the slowest internet speeds out of any 1st world country on the planet, right?
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28894 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 11:31 am to
quote:

So I don’t know how a school or place could get free internet once they built their lines, so essentially the money or subsidies kept going back to the ISPs in a big circle jerk.

Also, schools get their costs for service based on the number of students on free lunch. One school’s internet bill could run in the thousands and be right by a fiber node (if it is in an affluent neighborhood, less kids on school lunch) and the cost to run the connection is minimal. On the other hand, another school in the hood several miles from a node and a wire had to be special run for that location could be just a few hundred because of subsidies (more kids on free lunch)

One school system I know built a fiber LAN (metro circuit) interconnecting the schools and central office and the WAN access was purchased for central office was then shared and monitored down to the schools where it could be purchased cheaper (closer to the central office days of pricing). I remember hearing horror stories about how there was never enough bandwidth to the internet.


it's called e-rate and it has created a fukery of situations in my life. i used to work for schools (and still do to a degree.)

it's a legit "use" of tax breaks but gets abused regularly. i have some funny stories of what your tax dollars have gone to over the years.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35319 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 11:36 am to
quote:

It was delayed a couple of years by lawsuits from Att and Cox, but eventually got rolled out. It is pretty sweet


I don't get how people put most/all of the blame on local governments when the multi billion dollar companies hit them with lawsuits seemingly every time they try to break away.

They get insane subsidies to build out the network and then sue to block anyone else from using their infrastructure (that they didn't pay for)

Siding with ISPs on almost anything is anti-free market.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25982 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 11:40 am to
quote:

I’ll be looking forward to the class action lawsuit verdict. My check for $1.13 will be justice served!


I was thinking the exact same thing except I expect a Coupon not Cash refund to be issued for $20 dollars towards future services.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 11:43 am to
quote:

In fact, in 1992, the speed of broadband, as detailed in state laws, was 45 Mbps in both directions


Did they mean kbs?
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 11:45 am to
But let the free market do its thing!! Small government in the internet realm is better for the consumer!
Posted by canteen
Member since Dec 2017
779 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 11:48 am to
hell yeah!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260477 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 11:49 am to
quote:

But let the free market do its thing


wtf?

What's free market about mandated taxes and fees? This isn't a free market issue, it's a regulatory issue
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260477 posts
Posted on 1/5/18 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Siding with ISPs on almost anything is anti-free market.


It's amazing how many people have no concept of the free market
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram