- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amazon will suspend cloud services to Parler, which can take the Twitter rival offline
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:43 pm to OweO
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:43 pm to OweO
quote:
I honestly don't think
quote:
OweO
Stopped reading there. No one on here gives a rats arse what you think. You think stupid thoughts.
0
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:43 pm to USMEagles
quote:
What is the appropriate response to seeing your democratic victories ignored and undermined, for decades?
you got any proof for these unsubstantiated accusations? and I dunno... maybe take a page out of Democrats playbook, unfortunately... did they form an insurrection and loot government buildings when Gore lost, despite having won the popular vote? what about in 2016, when the exact same thing happened?
quote:so naturally it's the other sides fault for him not doing what he said he'd do, despite having both sides of Congress... c'mon man... now you are just sounding silly
What is the appropriate response to being told "elections have consequences," but then seeing Trump denied the biggest thing he campaigned on despite Republicans controlling the House and Senate?
quote:
our system 100% has failed and does not warrant our veneration anymore.
I'd agree it's FAILING, but it's not totally failed... but we, meaning BOTH sides, need to learn how effectively work together, or it clearly will collapse...
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:45 pm to chRxis
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:45 pm to chRxis
quote:
breaching their own fricking Capitol, causing chaos,
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:45 pm to Centinel
quote:
If congress members were put in harms way something would have been done.
Oh so something should be done only if it's our Congress members put in danger.
I mean frick everyone else right?
quote:
It just so happens that people with influence are personally being impacted so they took action.
Jesus. This statement is even fricking worse.
agree, 100%
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:46 pm to Scruffy
quote:
They actually did lay siege to a federal courthouse for months, while attempting to burn it to the ground.
Occupy Wall Street impacted our financial markets and had a rape tent on site for women that were assaulted and were encouraged to be silent. Crickets.
The double standard is what's frustrating. I know there are fringe elements on both sides.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:47 pm to Scruffy
Didnt Liz Warren encourage people to take over the Capital during the Kavanaugh hearings?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:48 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
nd had a rape tent on site for women that were assaulted and were encouraged to be silent.
Wait. What? I agree with almost every you've stated in this thread but I have never heard a thing about a 'rape tent.'
What the hell is that about?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:49 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
The double standard is what's frustrating.
This is my entire argument. The blatant hypocrisy and double standards from our politicians and media.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:53 pm to supadave3
quote:
Wait. What? I agree with almost every you've stated in this thread but I have never heard a thing about a 'rape tent.'
What the hell is that about?
A lot of women in the Occupy Wall Street movement reported being sexually assaulted and supposedly they had onsite counseling for it. I wasn't there, so obviously I'm just repeating what I heard, but it wasn't from Alex Jones but from what I consider to be fairly reputable media sources.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:54 pm to goofball
Suck it, fascists
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:55 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Suck it, fascists
Anyone who doesn't think exactly like me is a fascist!
Posted on 1/10/21 at 5:55 pm to Scruffy
quote:
You can not fix the system by not condemning the banning of viewpoints from discussion.
when/if the government bans the viewpoint, violating the 1st Amendment, then I will condemn it... until then, if it's a private company banning a user for whatever the private company thinks it needs to be banned for, that's a totally separate issue...
you are a physician, right? I may be mixing you up with someone, I can't remember, but think of it this way... you have a private practice... you think a private insurance company, who pays below market reimbursement for EVERY patient, and doesn't reimburse in a timely manner, etc, should be forced upon you? or should you have the right to refuse to take that insurer's patients and the option to participate in that insurer's plans?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:05 pm to chRxis
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:05 pm to chRxis
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:34 pm to Scruffy
quote:
That isn’t akin to the current situation because it isn’t about access, it is about viewpoint.
it's really about both, and I've already said I don't agree with the Parler banning, despite having no problem Amazon's right as a private company to do what they want to do with respect to their business...
quote:
There are others, but they are small and their reputations are unknown.
but still allowed to exist, correct? if so, what's the problem?
quote:
Now, the major journals collude to prevent the expansion of the others AND prevent the spread of medical knowledge they disagree with.
can you PROVE the collusion between FB, Google, Amazon, etc? or are you doing what everyone else is, and assuming that it exists, b/c well, you just KNOW it because it FEELS like it?
quote:
That is an apt analogy.
no, it's not... you have a lot of presupposition and don't account for government oversight, at all... b/c If there is, then there are acceptable standards for those journals, therefore, can't be just "opinion" based information disguised as facts, since those "facts" wouldn't be able to be replicated via peer review/subsequent testing methodologies... you KNOW this, yet didn't include it in your analogy... wonder why?
quote:
And I assume you would have no issue with that, correct?
again, does the large journals shut down those little journals or does the government?
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 1/10/21 at 7:13 pm to chRxis
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 1/11/21 at 1:03 pm to goofball
It doesn't bother me that Twitter disabled Trump's account. That's their private company, they ban people all of the time. It happens.
What does bother me is Google/Apple/Amazon basically colluding to shut Parler down. I do hope Parler can fight back someway.
What does bother me is Google/Apple/Amazon basically colluding to shut Parler down. I do hope Parler can fight back someway.
Posted on 1/11/21 at 1:29 pm to QJenk
quote:
hat does bother me is Google/Apple/Amazon basically colluding to shut Parler down. I do hope Parler can fight back someway.
This is what is extremely alarming to me.
Posted on 1/11/21 at 1:30 pm to MsState of mind
quote:did you actually follow through?
It’ll hurt but see ya prime
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News