Started By
Message

re: Amazon seeking second headquarters for 50K employees

Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:26 pm to
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:26 pm to
I'm not reading 14 pages, but is Gary on the case for this going in NBR somewhere yet?
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72928 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Dark horse is MSP.
WRONG

The "Dark horse" is officially Bogalusa, Louisiana.
Posted by Bob Sacamano
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
5294 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:35 pm to
I think Jeff Bezos is from TX or lived in TX so look for one of the big 4 in TX to get it.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28165 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:39 pm to
Memphis is the headquarters of Fedex and has no state income taxes.
Posted by doublecutter
Member since Oct 2003
7026 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:43 pm to
It will be in N.C.
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12452 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Well they would probably be a bit more excited when a person with a $100,000 salary in Seattle would be able to get by on roughly a $64,500 salary in Columbus while maintaining the same standard of living.

You think young talent cares about that? Cost of living will not even be in any sort of consideration for Amazon.

I still find it amazing that people have this perception that Amazon is a great company to work for. Pretty much everyone I know that works there hates it, but they pay decent. Terrible work/life balance. Amazon has been trying to make improvements recently, but still has a ways to go.
Posted by southernelite
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2009
53561 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 10:20 pm to
I'd put Plano the odds on favorite to get this thing
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297211 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

still find it amazing that people have this perception that Amazon is a great company to work for. Pretty much everyone I know that works there hates it, but they pay decent. Terrible work/life balance. Amazon has been trying to make improvements recently, but still has a ways to go.



Yep it a terrible work environment by most accounts
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8577 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

quote:
huge tech and start up hub, major university cluster, international airport and city, etc.


NYC gets richer



Actually not NYC
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61628 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Pretty much everyone I know that works there hates it,

Well yeah, millennials hate all work.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35373 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 12:11 am to
quote:

You think young talent cares about that?
Why wouldn't they? Home prices and rent prices are 2 to 3 times more expensive in Seattle than they are here, and we have one of the hottest rental markers in the country too. A one bedroom apartment goes for a thousand more per month, while a 2 bedroom is almost 1300 more per month.

If talent doesn't care about an extra 12,000 per year on rent or mortgage payments alone, then that talent better be in the top 99.9% of income, or that talent is not very smart, which calls the talent into question.

I'm not saying that it's a sole consideration, but it would foolish to not consider tens of thousands of net income.
quote:

Cost of living will not even be in any sort of consideration for Amazon.
Why wouldn't it be? Would the same position in a far cheaper area require the same salary?

If 65,000 in one place goes as far as far as a 100,000 in another than any wouldn't they pay less for the same work at a cheaper place. Anything between the cost of living difference would mean the salary for a cheaper city is has more value, even with thoughts it less.

I mean if $80,000 that would be a far better (20 to 25 percent) salary in Columbus than $100,000 in Seattle. If they can provide a better value for a salary and save $20,000 for each of the 50,000 employees, then that's a billion dollars less in salary costs per year.

And since those costs also include the costs associated the the business itself (rent, construction, utilities, etc.), that's assuredly well above a billion dollars in saving each and every year.

And besides Seattle wasn't a prime destination for people for most of its history. From 1960 it most population across various decades, and only had 6,000 more people by 2000. It's added almost 96,000 in the last 6 years alone, a yearly growth rate almost 90 times the 4 decades leading up 2000.

I really enjoyed Seattle when I visited a couple years back, and it sunny the whole time, but it's reputation as a dreary city is accurate ( 2nd most dreary city), and that's not usually an ideal climate for people and is actually not usually good for one's.

Yet, it's now a desirable location, but I don't think it's a coincidence that Seattle's growth occured at the same time as the growth of many of its largests companies like Starbucks, Amazon, Costco, and Microsoft. So it seems clear that jobs drove demand for the location, which would be the case for most places, including and especially wherever Amazon chooses to build this new headquarters.
quote:

I still find it amazing that people have this perception that Amazon is a great company to work for. Pretty much everyone I know that works there hates it, but they pay decent.
Yeah. It doesn't seem to the most satisfying work environment, but I'm sure the salary plus having Amazon on a resume is worth it.
Posted by SnoopALoop
Nashville
Member since Apr 2014
4535 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 12:37 am to
Come on down to Frisco/Plano! I need a new job.
Posted by NOLAManBlog
The Big Nasty
Member since Dec 2012
1218 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 12:47 am to
1. Memphis
2. Somewhere between LaPlace and Sorrento
3. DFW
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8577 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:16 am to
Dude, you do realize salaries tend to correlate almost perfectly with cost of living for companies like that, right?

A coder or product manager in Seattle making $150,000 annually is going to see a corresponding hit when he or she moves to Columbus. It's why P&G and Ford and GE can afford to pay their people less than Google and Facebook even though they are often just as talented.

It's not a 1:1 calculation for a firm like Amazon. They believe, probably correctly, that their top line expansion is justified by staying or expanding in a more expensive place. Else, every firm from Tulsa and Jacksonville would be dominating American commerce right now.
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
42417 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:19 am to
quote:


That's because the tax rate in CA has driven them out.


And yet CA is still the king of venture capital investment......Texas sells out its citizens by giving away tax money to big corporations that are searching for a payoff. That creates demand for housing which gives those citizens have lived in their house for 25 years a huge tax increase. Sure, they coukd sell.....but where do you move?.....Stop giving corporations tax breaks to move to your city and allow the private market to determine it.
This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 1:26 am
Posted by DannyB
Bagram, Afghanistan
Member since Aug 2010
6141 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:30 am to
When I posted Huntsville, AL, on page one I did not know that they were looking for metros over 1 million, which sucks. i still think Huntsville would be great!! Toyota is there, there are over 600 defense contractors, including all the big boys, in the metro area, lots of tech firms have offices there as well. Great schools. Low crime rate. Easy interstate access. From HSV you can be in Nashville or Birmingham in 1.5 hours and Atlanta or Memphis in 4 hours.

The city and state are really good with tax breaks as long as the company keeps up their end of the deal. They are in the process of opening a Remington Firearms plant in HSV and they get tax breaks from the city as long as they meet agreed upon guidelines for creating a certain number of new jobs each year.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60729 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 8:33 am to
quote:

The "Dark horse" is officially Bogalusa, Louisiana.
Alexandria has about 50k people, coincidence? Nope.
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15127 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 9:32 am to
This was still on page one, and we get another one.
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 15Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram