Started By
Message

re: All show and no go... many 80s muscle cars were weak sauce

Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:19 am to
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
21742 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:19 am to

All American manufacturers.

5 GMs
1 AMC
1 Ford
1 Chrysler
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
145157 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:22 am to
Comparing car technology with a 40 year gap
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
58719 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

All show and no go... many 80s muscle cars were weak sauce


Agreed, I had a couple of sports cars during the 80s and they weren’t worth shite. The government had begun emissions standards, but the technology just wasn’t there to achieve the standards. They were forced to do things like smog pumps and exhaust gas recirculating (EGR).
Posted by Civildawg
Member since May 2012
9811 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:32 am to
quote:

1972 was the end of the muscle car era.


Correct. The government started making car manufacturers put smog stuff in 1971 which had an effect on horsepower too. By 1972 it was the end of horsepower
Posted by SmelvinRat
Slumwoody
Member since Oct 2015
1779 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:32 am to
Pops bought my older sister a 1971 Trans Am with the 455 V8. Dumb move, she wrecked it 3 times in 6 months. I finally got ahold of it when I could drive in the 80s. No 16 year old should have driven that monster, but it was so fun...
Posted by chrome_daddy
LA (Lower Ashvegas)
Member since May 2004
2332 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:34 am to
You won't get any argument out of me.

Had one of these as I was graduating LSU. Had the 150 horse marine 5.0, a two barrel, 3:08 differential, and a four speed where forth was overdrive. What a pig this thing was...a deer took it out of it's (and my) misery.

I will say that Mustangs did re-emerge with better power options in the latter part of the 80's, but nothing to compare w the 70's.

Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
107748 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:34 am to
The Nova was GM’s sort of awkward bizarre answer to the Mustang.

There was something rather oddly badass about them, though.
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
938 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

The Nova was GM’s sort of awkward bizarre answer to the Mustang.

There was something rather oddly badass about them, though.


The Nova was in no way an answer to the Mustang. That was the Camaro/Firebird's job. The Nova was more of an answer to the Maverick and economy cars in general. It was popular with hot rudders because it would fit a Mark IV Big Block between the fenders and was very lightweight.

For other posters,

- ALL cars now have EGR, though one of you were right on the emissions pumps being a temporary bandaid.

- The Mustang began a new HP war in 1985 that is still echoing today.

- A handful, though not all by any means, of the late 80's cars would be markedly faster on modern tires. A modern performance tire is light years better than a track-only slick from the 1960's, and measurably better than the first dedicated street/strip treaded race tires that were coming out in the late 1980s. Late 1980's Mustangs, manual 305 TPI and auto 350 TPI F-bodies all three with the right option boxes checked were all traction-limited, so their 0-60 and quarter mile times make them look slower than they are compared to modern cars with either a) more sticky tires on the performance cars or b) highly optimized 7/8/9/10 speed gearing to overcome lack of torque on grocery getters.

- One reason the GN/GNX was so fast for its time was that, stock, it didn't have the torque to just blow the tires off right off the line. It launched more like a modern car, and by 60' in, the turbo was spooled and off you went.

- The tires are also the main reason that comparing any data from the 1960's-1972 to modern cars is pointless. A modern fast car will have a 60 foot time in the mid 1's, a 1960's car was probably mid-2's to even 3's, which translates to a larger difference at 60 MPH and even more in the quarter. On top of that, tire spin on the 1-2 and 2-3 upshifts caused even more lost time with the old cars. That's 70-80% tire, with the rest being suspension design and traction control.
This post was edited on 6/8/25 at 8:59 am
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23482 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:03 am to
Yeah, early 70s were the muscle cars. had a SS454, 450hp 1970. nice car. did not win every race, but won a lot.
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
32779 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:12 am to
Dad had one. That thing was damn fast and timed it at 5.0s 0-60.

Cars now are just goofy fast.
Posted by LSU Neil
Springfield
Member since Feb 2007
3053 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:12 am to
quote:

That Firebird was the biggest piece of bullshite in automotive history.


The firebird came out with the worst four cylinder ever manufactured. Later on they heard from the consumer how poor is was and offered a couple more engine upgrades.
By and large, the 80s were the worst decade in us automotive history.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34918 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:15 am to
quote:

While not as fast, they were much more fun to drive.


As long as you went in a straight line, and had forever to stop. And dont lock those brakes...

My wife's SUV can out- accelerate, out-corner, and out-brake damn near anything from the 60s,70s, and 80s.

But my old Trans-Am with T-tops was fun AF.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283499 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:20 am to
quote:


As long as you went in a straight line, and had forever to stop. And dont lock those brakes...


We went in straight lines, very fast...and loudly.

Awesome time to be a teen, car culture, cruising, etc.....


Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
36755 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:21 am to
quote:

RX-7


Brap brap brap brap brap brap brap.

A tuned rx-7 is ear sex.

This post was edited on 6/8/25 at 9:24 am
Posted by Strannix
President Trump's America
Member since Dec 2012
51368 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:39 am to
quote:

No better way to rile up a bunch of crusty old bastards at work than to tell them that old muscle cars were pieces of shite.


Lol whats your IQ buddy?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
108470 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:43 am to
quote:

By and large, the 80s were the worst decade in us automotive history.


I would tend to agree, but you should probably claw back to the late 70s
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
3694 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Comparing car technology with a 40 year gap


It’s pretty universal for any car of that era. There wasn’t a 80s child on the planet that didn’t want a Countach or a Delorian, and by all accounts they’re great to look at and miserable to drive. Hell, somehow Porsche’s brand grew stronger after it leaned into the propensity for their turbos to kill its owners.
This post was edited on 6/8/25 at 9:50 am
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
2519 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:49 am to
Yep, I once had a Riviera with 340 hp and thought it was the bomb.

Now, virtually every thing hotter than Kia has that much.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34918 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 10:04 am to
Eh...mostly that was lack of understanding of the RWD/RE by the drivers...

Best be ready when that turbo spooled up...

They can still get away from you, but Porsche has done a masterful engineering job with those cars, especially with AWD.
Posted by ELLSSUU
Member since Jan 2005
7714 posts
Posted on 6/8/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

many 80s muscle cars were weak sauce


Now do the 70's.

For reference, the 1970 454 Corvette was lauded as a proper muscle car. It did 0-60 in 7 seconds. It had a 15 second 1/4 mile. Road & Track tested.

Today's Honda Civic Hybrid 4-door sedan, with zero performance credibility, does both faster. 0-60 in 6.2 seconds and a 14.8 second 1/4 mile.

That same Vette was epa rated at 9 MPG while the Civic gets 49 MPG.

A Civic Type R would absolutely maul the 454 Vette.

Technology and advancement in autos is astounding.






This post was edited on 6/8/25 at 10:33 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram