Started By
Message

Alexander the great vs Genghis Khan

Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:58 pm
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16052 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:58 pm
If they have the same size armies on a terrain foreign to both armies who ya got? Personally, I'd go with Alexander no matter what as I believe he is the most gifted military mind to ever live.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:59 pm to
bro, do you even Attila the Hun?
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
16875 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:01 pm to
Alexander Army would be better armored. But I remember ghenghis archers on horseback were deadly accurate. I wonder what the Vegas line would be.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67105 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:01 pm to
Depends on the terrain. Genghis wins on an open plain, Alexander in mountainous territory. Ghengis has major technological improvements on his side like the trebuchet, compound bow, and stirrup. Genghis wins 99/100.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16052 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:02 pm to
He would've got shite on by Alexander as well. The guy conquered lands from Greece to India in 8 years.
Posted by junior
baton rouge
Member since Mar 2005
2249 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:04 pm to
Khan w/ horses and compound bows would destroy them. He was around 1500 years after Alex and destroyed everyone at that time.

It's like high school vs NFL.
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35628 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:04 pm to
It's impossible to say because terrain would be vital to the outcome.

Open field and Alexander's phalanx hammer and anvil tactic would be decimated by the mobile Mongolian hordes. They'd beat Alex's calvary and pepper the plalanx with arrows from a safe distance.

Alexander would obviously look to play the mountain pass game and get the Mongols attacking into a confined space. Forests would also work but not as ideal for remaining organized.
Posted by Lord_Ford
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2016
4000 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

But I remember ghenghis archers on horseback were deadly accurate


God dam how old are you?
Posted by reveille
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
1198 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:07 pm to
I'm going with the bad assess on the horses. Alexander may have been the better leader but those Mongolian horsemen were an unstoppable machine.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16052 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:07 pm to
You people are highly underestimating Alexander's mind. He was a genius outside of warfare. Imagine if Tom Brady or lebron was considered one of the smartest people in the world
Posted by celltech1981
Member since Jul 2014
8139 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

The guy conquered lands from Greece to India in 8 years.



bruh do you even mongol empire?

Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16052 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:09 pm to
You do realize a large part of Alexander's army was cavalry as Well? He led his cavalry into battle personally and defeated Persian light cavalry, chariots, horse archers and Indian war elephants. I don't believe the fight would be as lopsided as you people seem to believe
Posted by celltech1981
Member since Jul 2014
8139 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:09 pm to
Genghis was a genius at warfare as well.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35043 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:10 pm to
If it's any sort of open land the Mongols win hands down. Their feigned flight would absolutely decimate the heavily armored Hypaspist as they get worn the frick out chasing after the feigned flight just to be counter attacked from the side/rear. Also the heavy cav that the Macedonians used would have done zero to nothing to the much lighter and quicker Mongol cav due once again to their armor weighing them down.

If it's an easily defensible spot where the rear and flanks are covered and the Greeks stand their ground then it becomes more even.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16052 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

bruh do you even mongol empire?

it took the Mongols hundreds of years to build that empire. Alexander conquered half that in less than a decade
Posted by LSUBanker
Gonzales, La
Member since Sep 2003
2552 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:10 pm to
Alexander the great vs Genghis Khan

I'd go with the guy whose DNA is in about a billion people today.
Posted by TDcline
American Gardens building 11th flor
Member since Aug 2015
9281 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:11 pm to
General James Mattis
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

I'd go with the guy whose DNA is in about a billion people today.

Wilt Chamberlin?
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35043 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

You do realize a large part of Alexander's army was cavalry as Well


Light cav is the answer to heavy cav. You realize this right? Heavy horse was used against infantry as a means of punching a hole. Not as an anti horse unit.

Heavy horse would simply tire chasing after the light horse and become a human pincushion in the process.

Sheesh. Learn your foot/horse tactics bro.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69103 posts
Posted on 11/22/17 at 1:13 pm to
Alexander was a great leader
Genghis was good at consolidating power.
Alexander had no real plan to keep power. Though his General Ptolemy set up a nearly 300 year dynasty in Egypt only ending when Cleopatra chose the wrong successor to Caesar.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram