Acceptable Jeopardy answer phrasing

No. The question cannot be phrased in the second person. The contestant is responding to the clue, not Alex reading the clue. So second person phrasing wouldn't make sense. Your question is dumb and you should feel dumb.

quote:

---

No, because that would be a yes or no question.

---

This too. Again, dumb question.

what is the word no?

Can you Jewify a response? I mean when you raise your voice in stressing the last word, as in "I should tell you?"

Trebek: "This city is the home of major league baseball's White Sox"

Me: "Chicago, Illinois?"

It's still a question, even if it's not phrased like one

If you say no, you're anti-semitic

No (yeah I'm anti-Semitic, big deal) because when you raise the inflection of your voice like that, you're implying "either or". It's still a yes/no question and would not result in a question that would be correctly answered by the clue.

I never cared about the whole making it a question thing. It's a quiz show to me, the form is really unimportant

quote:

---

Yea it's kind of pointless the whole phrase it as a question thing. It adds nothing to the show.

---

The "questions" are phrased as statements, so it makes sense.

They do it just to be quirky. It's a marketing thing, something to remember them by.

It's high time Jeopardy dropped that absurd "answer in the form of a question" gimmick. It never made much sense from the get-go because the clues, which are presumed to be the answers to those questions, would NOT be satisfactory answers to those questions if someone asked them of you.

For example, suppose the clue were "it's black and white and read all over"... a contestant would get credit by responding "what is a newspaper?" But if a kid in a classroom were asked to define a newspaper he'd get zero credit with answering "it's black and white and read all over."

Wrong.... Your answer should be" what is Chicago?