Started By
Message

re: A 99 million person COVID-19 vaccine trial side effects has released its data

Posted on 1/15/25 at 12:15 pm to
Posted by AnotherWin4LSU
Member since Jun 2023
395 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Does that study mention that virus induced myocarditis is 6X more likely than a vaccine induced myocarditis?


No it does not. It does not mention them because the study just compared the incidence of the most common adverse effects which included myocarditis to a control group. The control group was an average of the incidence of those adverse effects in the years prior to covid. As pointed out earlier in the thread the highest incidence rate of myocarditis from the vaccines was Moderna at 28/100,000. That is scary until you look at the incidence of myocarditis is covid patients.

quote:

any epidemiology studies of myocarditis in patients with COVID-19 have been conducted since the pandemic started, with some of the larger studies listed in Table S2. The overall incidence of myocarditis in the United States from SARS-CoV-2 infection has been estimated in a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at around 150 cases/100 000 versus 9 cases/100 000 individuals in non-COVID cases during the same time period (Table 1).
LINK

28/100,000 is less than 150/100,000. The vaccine skeptics and regular posters in vaccine threads will not like it and will ignore it all day long. However the math speaks for itself, the incidence rate of myocarditis for vaccination is less than the incidence rate for infection all day long.

Again not here to argue for or against the vaccine or anything like that because frankly I do not give a crap about your vaccination status one way or another and the Biden administration and the people who pushed the vaccine mandates are out of power in 5 days.
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
14542 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 12:47 pm to
I'm hoping at some point soon. Pure blood will be demanded and worth a pretty penny.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
5280 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 1:13 pm to
And from Canada today.

Public Health Agency confirms higher death rates among boosted Canadians compared to the unvaccinated

LINK
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9851 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

28/100,000 is less than 150/100,000. The vaccine skeptics and regular posters in vaccine threads will not like it and will ignore it all day long. However the math speaks for itself, the incidence rate of myocarditis for vaccination is less than the incidence rate for infection all day long.

You fail to include or seemingly even comprehend the fact that the “vaccine” did not prevent people from getting infected. So it’s not getting rid of anyone in the 150 group. It’s adding more to the 150 group.
Posted by TheDeathValley
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2010
18957 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

I am proud to be a pureblood



You might not have the covid vaccine, but you most certainly have

Mumps;
Measles;
Rubella;
Polio;
Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxoids;
Pertussis;
Haemophilus influenzae type B;
Hepatitis A
Hepatitis B

So I don't know about "pure"
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14026 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

4. 249% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following viral-vector injection.


I would check on this stat to make sure their significant others were not poisoning them with arsenic. That is an irrationally high increase for GBS.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
2106 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Pure blood

Does this mean you never contracted the engineered virus?
Posted by fofuh4
btr
Member since Aug 2022
117 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 4:28 pm to
these docs are a joke. you have a better chance of getting hit by a bus and then winning the lottery.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
8205 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 5:09 pm to
The 150/100,000 was gotten from -
quote:

Association between COVID-19 and myocarditis using hospital-based administrative data - United States, March 2020-January 2021.



Hospitals were packed with covid patients during that time frame already especially with worst cases and anyone having pre-existing conditions or above certain ages. It’s also leaving out any positives for infection that didn’t require hospitalization.

Pre or post covid I would think milder cases of myocarditis are going to be under reported just using data from hospitals alone as it doesn’t always require hospitalization. Mild cases might be under reported to any medical facility especially with younger males, and it seems like this would be even more the case with vaccinated people who aren’t actively seeing a doctor for an illness.

There is another study referenced at your link using data from 40 hospitals in the western US that shows an increase in myocarditis during expanded vaccine rollout in March 2021 thru May 2021 above the levels the same hospitals reported in March 2020 - January 2021.

It also is just based on hospital records and might be able to be attributed to things other than vaccination rollout alone including people getting a double dose even though they had previous covid infection. It’s not like they were testing for antibodies before giving people the vaccine, but it does seem to at least show an increased amount that got to the level of going to get help at a hospital that correlates to expanded vaccine rollout.



Posted by Cypdog
Member since Jan 2014
841 posts
Posted on 1/15/25 at 7:26 pm to
I did not read this whole thread.

The obvious conclusion is that if these guys are right, then Omar Epps’s character on House would have been right 249% more.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12789 posts
Posted on 1/16/25 at 7:16 am to
quote:

but still in the clinical trial phase.
Hmmmm......care to guess why NONE have ever made it out of clinical trials?
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12789 posts
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

Hmmmm......care to guess why NONE have ever made it out of clinical trials?
Two downvotes, but not one answer. Here, I'll help the retards out. ZERO! Why is that? BECAUSE ALL THE LAB RATS DIED!!! Scientists have been working on mRNA vaccines for DECADES but not ONE has ever made it thru clinical trial to the point that human subjects were ever involved. Don't believe me? Look it up for yourself.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
62936 posts
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:32 pm to
My man
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12789 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Two downvotes, but not one answer. Here, I'll help the retards out. ZERO! Why is that? BECAUSE ALL THE LAB RATS DIED!!! Scientists have been working on mRNA vaccines for DECADES but not ONE has ever made it thru clinical trial to the point that human subjects were ever involved. Don't believe me? Look it up for yourself.
Crickets!
Posted by sabanisarustedspoke
Member since Jan 2007
5440 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:47 pm to
quote:


I've already let it be known to my 20 year old stepdaughter that I will not accept or support her procreating with a mudblood.

Us purebloods have precious bodily fluids that must be protected.



That is adorable you think your stepdaughter is gonna let you pick who's dick goes in her. Spoiler alert, too late pop..
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram