- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 5 Officers shot in Houston
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:16 pm to fallguy_1978
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:16 pm to fallguy_1978
I’m more for making the buying and selling of any drug legal but the use, illegal.
Totally remove the profit motive.
Totally remove the profit motive.
1
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:20 pm to Bullfrog
quote:
I’m more for making the buying and selling of any drug legal but the use, illegal.
Totally remove the profit motive.
We are just funding the cartels and gangbangers. We aren't stopping anyone from doing them. At the same time we are putting many non violent drug addicts in prison. It's a never ending cycle.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:21 pm to pkloa
Interesting.
I stepped away to get my stuff ready for work tomorrow and you doubled down on your “gun control” ignorance.
I’d sit here and gladly debate every transparent weak point you’ve made, but it seems a few of my proud 2nd Ammendment OT brethren have already shut down all of your weak talking points.
This is not an argument you can ever win. Here or elsewhere, as long as common sense prevails. Have a good night.
I stepped away to get my stuff ready for work tomorrow and you doubled down on your “gun control” ignorance.
I’d sit here and gladly debate every transparent weak point you’ve made, but it seems a few of my proud 2nd Ammendment OT brethren have already shut down all of your weak talking points.
This is not an argument you can ever win. Here or elsewhere, as long as common sense prevails. Have a good night.
This post was edited on 1/28/19 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:22 pm to Klark Kent
Superman 
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:24 pm to beerJeep
Strong dislike for tobacco. Would rather people shoot themselves with a manual action gun than kill themselves over 40 years. But, don't want to get too much in the way of freedoms, ya know?
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:25 pm to Klark Kent
Thanks, amigo, you as well!
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:25 pm to pkloa
quote:
Strong dislike for tobacco. Would rather people shoot themselves with a manual action gun than kill themselves over 40 years.
What’s a manual action gun?
quote:
But, don't want to get too much in the way of freedoms, ya know?
Except them pesky gun owners freedoms, right?
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:34 pm to beerJeep
Oooh, pedantry looks great on you. I figured that last jab would do the trick.
Look, I've been much more in the middle than some of you are willing to admit. I recognize the right to defend one's self, family, and property. I also appreciate the desire to hunt for food. I think weaponry is out of control, not something to be abolished. A few from the opposing view have engaged in reasonable discourse, and I thank them.
Look, I've been much more in the middle than some of you are willing to admit. I recognize the right to defend one's self, family, and property. I also appreciate the desire to hunt for food. I think weaponry is out of control, not something to be abolished. A few from the opposing view have engaged in reasonable discourse, and I thank them.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:36 pm to pkloa
quote:
I think weaponry is out of control,
The sword has evolved to beat the shield and visa versa since the beginning. It won’t stop now. No matter what.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:37 pm to pkloa
quote:
Look, I've been much more in the middle than some of you are willing to admit.
ban everything except shotguns and single shot rifles is middle? quote:
I think weaponry is out of control, not something to be abolished
Why?
quote:
A few from the opposing view have engaged in reasonable discourse, and I thank them.
Cool. So, back to the topic at hand.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:37 pm to beerJeep
quote:
What’s a manual action gun?
I just went past this, if he uses that term chances are he cannot explain it
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:38 pm to fr33manator
I wish TD.com was around for the nuclear disarmament talks.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:39 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
I’d sit here and gladly debate every transparent weak point you’ve made, but it seems a few of my proud 2nd Ammendment OT brethren have already shut down all of your weak talking points
How many folks would still be alive if guns had never been invented? Chew on that one for a moment Klark
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:40 pm to Sun God
Have they released the names of the bad guys?
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:41 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Totally on board. Banning doesn't work and makes the market violent
It is incredible that despite this fact being crystal clear and demonstrated over and over again people still think prohibitions are the answer.
People are going to look back at the WOD one day and think we are just as ignorantly shortsighted as the prohibitionist in the early 20th century.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:42 pm to beerJeep
quote:Nope, heavily restrict everything but pump action shotguns, bolt action rifles, and single action revolvers.
ban everything except shotguns and single shot rifles
quote:Why not?
Why?
quote:Yeah, sad about cops getting shot. Or not sad, depending on Christ knows what logic some of these posters use.
So, back to the topic at hand.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:43 pm to cave canem
quote:
People are going to look back at the WOD one day and think we are just as ignorantly shortsighted as the prohibitionist in the early 20th century.
Truth!
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:45 pm to pkloa
quote:
Nope, heavily restrict everything but pump action shotguns, bolt action rifles, and single action revolvers.
why are you scared of my uzi? My mp5s? What about crack barrel shotguns? And why single action revolvers? You know those are more dangerous than double action, right? I mean, I’d expect someone who’s talking about banning things knows what he’s banning....
And what do you think should be done about the guns currently in circulation?
quote:
Why not?
“Shall not be infringed”
quote:
Yeah, sad about cops getting shot. Or not sad, depending on Christ knows what logic some of these posters use.
You’re a joke
This post was edited on 1/28/19 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:46 pm to pkloa
quote:
heavily restrict everything
"shall not be infringed"
your argument is irrelevant.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:47 pm to pkloa
When the founder fathers put in constitutional protections to allow us to bare or bear arms, they were talking fricking state of the art weaponry. Not longbows.
Your desire to restrict and re-interpret the intent of the founding fathers, makes you a commie at worst and a bleeding heart liberal at worser.
Your desire to restrict and re-interpret the intent of the founding fathers, makes you a commie at worst and a bleeding heart liberal at worser.
This post was edited on 1/28/19 at 10:49 pm
Page 11 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News