Started By
Message

re: 5 Officers shot in Houston

Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:52 pm to
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Nope, heavily restrict everything but pump action shotguns, bolt action rifles, and single action revolvers.


You just will never get "it" because you live in la la land.

Everyone with a criminal past is already restricted, how is that working out?

I will go one better and make the claim with almost absolute certainty these folks who shot the cops were already "restricted", what you want is to remove guns from law abiding citizens which are not the problem or issue.

You can keep making laws and increasing restrictions to the point where you dig up John Moses Browning and desecrate his corpse in anger but it is not going to stop criminals from getting guns.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:54 pm to
Shhhh I wanna hear his reasonings for allowing pump action shotguns over crack barrel shotguns.

I’m also curious to why he is okay with the far less safe single action revolvers over the safer double action revolver.

Oh, and let’s not forget how he’s okay with bolt action rifles that shoot some of the highest penetrating and most deadly rounds instead of the far less deadly blackpowder single shot.

It’s almost like homeboy doesn’t know shite about guns
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2303 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

why are you scared of my uzi? My mp5s?
Weapons designed for maximum lethality shouldn't be in our hands. The US military is the place for a Mk 19, not Jim's garage.
quote:

And what do you think should be done about the guns currently in circulation?
Excellent question. Turn ins are welcomed at any time. As arrests are made, they are destroyed. Jim keeps his shite in his house, it probably never becomes an issue, then his kids can decide to move them or turn them in.
quote:

“Shall not be infringed”
I don't like the "What about _____" bullshite argument. The moron on one side asks if I want to ban knives, the moron on the other asks if citizens should own anti-aircraft missiles. Reasonable people in the 21st century should be able to find middle ground.
quote:

You’re a joke
frickin' rude, man.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

It’s almost like homeboy doesn’t know shite about guns



It is not almost like, it is an absolute certainty, he is just regurgitating the shite he heard or read because he is not capable of self thought and has zero actual knowledge on the topic.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Weapons designed for maximum lethality shouldn't be in our hands. The US military is the place for a Mk 19, not Jim's garage.


ALL guns are designed for “maximum lethality” in that they’re designed to kill. No gun is more deadly than the next.

There goes that talking point
quote:

Excellent question. Turn ins are welcomed at any time. As arrests are made, they are destroyed. Jim keeps his shite in his house, it probably never becomes an issue, then his kids can decide to move them or turn them in.



quote:

I don't like the "What about _____" bullshite argument. The moron on one side asks if I want to ban knives, the moron on the other asks if citizens should own anti-aircraft missiles. Reasonable people in the 21st century should be able to find middle ground.

Middle ground. If an infantry man can carry it, I can own it.

Boom. No rockets. No nukes. No aircraft carriers.

Middle ground reached.
quote:

frickin' rude, man.

Facts are an ugly bitch.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:00 pm to
Oh, and feel free to explain your reasoning on what gun is allowed and not. I look forward to hearing this
quote:

Shhhh I wanna hear his reasonings for allowing pump action shotguns over crack barrel shotguns.

I’m also curious to why he is okay with the far less safe single action revolvers over the safer double action revolver.

Oh, and let’s not forget how he’s okay with bolt action rifles that shoot some of the highest penetrating and most deadly rounds instead of the far less deadly blackpowder single shot.
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2303 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Shhhh I wanna hear his reasonings...
Nah, I don't think you actually do.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Nah, I don't think you actually do.


No. I definitely do.

Ya see, I actively encourage dumbasses to prove to the world that they are dumbasses. Don’t hide it. Show it to the world mon frere.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
66807 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

I sure do like when rationality goes out the window. For the record, I'm a safety professional, so I'd love for the speed limit to be lowered. At least until autonomous cars are mandated, that is.

Wow. That's nice work there.

7/10
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2303 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Middle ground. If an infantry man can carry it, I can own it.
Do you actually converse with the type of people so extreme that this is middle ground?
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Do you actually converse with the type of people so extreme that this is middle ground?


How isn’t that middle ground? You realize I can legally own everything an infantryman carries sans explosives right now, right?

So... you really don’t know what the frick you’re talking about and it’s absolutely hilarious
This post was edited on 1/28/19 at 11:12 pm
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2303 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:11 pm to
I don't have the energy to PowerPoint this out, but it seems like your idea of the middle is way the frick over there. I get that I'm on the filthy liberal side of this argument, so I'm seeing it through my warped lens, but anybody wanting anything more than what you propose is certifiable, in my opinion.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

I don't have the energy to PowerPoint this out, but it seems like your idea of the middle is way the frick over there.


How so? Can you name specific non-explosive weapons infantrymen carry?

Gimme 5.

quote:

I get that I'm on the filthy liberal side of this argument, so I'm seeing it through my warped lens, but anybody wanting anything more than what you propose is certifiable, in my opinion.


Says a guy who quite literally can’t tell me what a manual action gun is. Thinks single action revolvers are safer than double action revolvers, wants Only the most dangerous rounds in the hands of civilians, and is a fan of pump action shotguns. The gun that was so horrible, the Germans tried to get it BANNED from warfare in wwi
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:16 pm to
Just say “I’m completely outclassed in this argument, I’m a fricking idiot, and I’ve been arse raped and schooled like none other” and I’ll gladly stop absolutely raping you.
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2303 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Can you name specific non-explosive weapons infantrymen carry?

Gimme 5.
Okay, without cheating:
M4A4(current?)
M9
M249, maybe
M240B
M2 (poor bastards)
M whatever the hell the Mossberg is
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Okay, without cheating: M4A4(current?) M9 M249, maybe M240B M2 (poor bastards) M whatever the hell the Mossberg is


And which of those is illegal to own, right now


Oh and what about the rest of the post? Why are you only responding to one part?
This post was edited on 1/28/19 at 11:20 pm
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2303 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

I’m a fricking idiot
I won't even try to argue that, I got work in 7 hours and I'm talking to you
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39215 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

Says a guy who quite literally can’t tell me what a manual action gun is. Thinks single action revolvers are safer than double action revolvers, wants Only the most dangerous rounds in the hands of civilians, and is a fan of pump action shotguns. The gun that was so horrible, the Germans tried to get it BANNED from warfare in wwi


So no comment?
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:23 pm to
What about blunt objects? They're responsible for more deaths than rifles. It's about saving lives, right? Right?

LINK

Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2303 posts
Posted on 1/28/19 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

Why are you only responding to one part?
Because I was proud of my recollection, dammit!
quote:

And which of those is illegal to own, right now
None, I suppose. I think there is heavy restriction on the full autos though, yeah?
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram