- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 gay men in a 3-way relationship adopt a baby girl in Canada
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:23 pm to tiggerthetooth
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:23 pm to tiggerthetooth
Ummm
You fruits are totally different than any other family.
Stupid VORs
You fruits are totally different than any other family.
Stupid VORs
0
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:23 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
You understand those studies are black people biased towards what the most common familial arrangement is for the black families right?
Theyre not open to an answer, they're deliberately seeking out to confirm their own bias.
You really dont have a clue how completely trash the social sciences are and continue to be.
I would expect anything that is pro-LGBTQ is be ESPECIALLY slathered in pro-LGBTQ bias.
Theyre not open to an answer, they're deliberately seeking out to confirm their own bias.
You really dont have a clue how completely trash the social sciences are and continue to be.
I would expect anything that is pro-LGBTQ is be ESPECIALLY slathered in pro-LGBTQ bias.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:28 pm to PensaTigers
quote:
The article itself says whike some had a small control group, or none at all. One absolute irrefutable way to tell someone is unintelligent is for them to read "study results" and refute them as fact. These are funded to manipulate idiots like YOU who dont ask questions about the validity of the study or basic understandings of the scientific method. In conclusion, you are factually unintelligent and should discontinue having opinions until you can recognize these funded studys flaws and outright purposeful scientific and logical failures.
Which study are you talking about? Whiny arse bitch from Pensacola probably went to woodham or Tate and wants to try and come here and attempt sound smart.
Who the frick cares about funding studies to promote African Americans being raised by their uncles? Or are you talking about same sex research and you’ve picked one article out of the hundreds to bitch about?
Cite some of your studies bitch and let’s have some discourse instead of you just being a pussy from behind a keyboard.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:34 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
Who the frick cares about funding studies to promote African Americans being raised by their uncles?
Um... do you know what "uncles" are in the black community? Hint, it ain't always the mother's brother.
quote:
attempt sound smart.
At least someone is trying... you should try it, too.
quote:
Cite some of your studies bitch and let’s have some discourse instead of you just being a pussy from behind a keyboard.
You are a vile, emotionally overwrought child. Perhaps you'd do well to get some rest and try again tomorrow once your jimmies are unrustled.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:39 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Um... do you know what "uncles" are in the black community? Hint, it ain't always the mother's brother.
No, shite. You’re making my point that relation doesn’t matter.
quote:
You are a vile, emotionally overwrought child. Perhaps you'd do well to get some rest and try again tomorrow once your jimmies are unrustled.
You want to kill dogs just because they’re pit bulls. You think gays can’t be good parents and will molest and rape their children. You don’t think black communities can’t provide whole community childcare that equates to “white” nuclear family standards.
I am 100% ok with being nothing like you and being on the other side of every argument you’re on. You can call me whatever bullshite you want because youre harmless.
This post was edited on 9/26/25 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:47 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
You want to kill dogs just because they’re pit bulls.
I want them to stop existing as an acceptable breed. I want owners held to very high standards and carry a shite ton of liability insurance. I want them spayed or neutered, all of them.
quote:
You think gays can’t be good parents and will molest and rape their children. You don’t think black communities can’t provide whole community childcare that equates to “white” nuclear family standards.
Even good gay parents are lacking in a crucial aspect of child rearing- which is modeling a masculine and feminine relationship in a family setting.
Yes, many gay men will do tragic things to their bought and paid for children.
I think black communities CAN provide stable upbringing to their children, they just mostly don't. A lot of white kids fall into the same deplorable paradigm of single motherhood and rotating "uncles". It is harmful to children no matter their race.
quote:
because youre harmless.
Of course I'm harmless... I don't engage in any of the shenanigans that you march for. Duh. that's the point. A normal, stable and balanced lifestyle is harmless.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:53 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I want them to stop existing as an acceptable breed. I want owners held to very high standards and carry a shite ton of liability insurance. I want them spayed or neutered, all of them.
You cheered on the shooting and poisoning of a neighbors dog and just the other day went out of your way to mention that you were sorry for the loss of their dog as long as it wasn’t a pit bull. Don’t play for the crowd. I member.
The rest of your bullshite I’m not even addressing. You can’t back up any of your views with actual scholarly research and posted a news article about a predator. How is your news story sample size of 1 somehow valid and you’re bitching about my study with a sample of 25? You’re just a dumb bitch.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:53 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
“We are a little different because we’re three, but we’re not different from any other family.”
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:00 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
You cheered on the shooting and poisoning of a neighbors dog and just the other day went out of your way to mention that you were sorry for the loss of their dog as long as it wasn’t a pit bull. Don’t play for the crowd. I member.
The thread I said "excepting pibbles" was a joke, you dotard. I mourn with anyone that goes through the loss of a pet- even cats.
You've posted nothing scholarly... and even if you did I sincerely doubt your ability to discuss it.
You are a very emotional creature. Perhaps message boards and "normies" aren't for you.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:09 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
You don’t think black communities can’t provide whole community childcare that equates to “white” nuclear family standards.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:17 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Look up "Intersectionality of Kink in the Gay Man's Sexual World"...
Oh no, a woman I don’t know and will never meet in real life, don’t call me gay something I know I’m not and has no bearing on my life. What will I do? Sally posted something mean.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:19 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
Im literally talking about YOUR LINK and quoting it admitting that some of the 75 of 79 studies admitted to small sample sizes and lack of control groups being true. Did i not make that clear enough, dumbass? Now ask yourself what this motivated article DIDNT admit to. So lets go over the points you failed to respond to.
A lot of studies are funded by motivated groups for political or falsified scientific gain.
A lot of studies can be easily picked apart for not recognizing a variable, excessive failure to recognize the different in causation and coorilation, or a control group that buffs numbers via examples provided by YOUR LINK that explain that low number and exclusive control groups exist in said studies.
I graduated from Milton, and im significantly smarter than you. Try to reply with something more than insults, i hate keeping idiots on track during a debate. Always having to hold your little hands to keep your dumbasses on track. Maybe put the bottle down and come back after a good sobering night of sleep buddy.
A lot of studies are funded by motivated groups for political or falsified scientific gain.
A lot of studies can be easily picked apart for not recognizing a variable, excessive failure to recognize the different in causation and coorilation, or a control group that buffs numbers via examples provided by YOUR LINK that explain that low number and exclusive control groups exist in said studies.
I graduated from Milton, and im significantly smarter than you. Try to reply with something more than insults, i hate keeping idiots on track during a debate. Always having to hold your little hands to keep your dumbasses on track. Maybe put the bottle down and come back after a good sobering night of sleep buddy.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:20 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
You've posted nothing scholarly... and even if you did I sincerely doubt your ability to discuss it. You are a very emotional creature. Perhaps message boards and "normies" aren't for you.
You’re right. Cornell isn’t scholarly. Cornell is for idiots. What even is Cornell? What does Ivy League mean? Probably something bad in terms of what you would be looking for in something scholarly.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:23 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
Oh no, a woman I don’t know and will never meet in real life, don’t call me gay something I know I’m not and has no bearing on my life. What will I do? Sally posted something mean.
Jeebus... dude, I meant actually look it up- I did. The search results have much (positive and affirming) information on the intersectionality of kink.
I posted that search term as something to show you that there is a LOT going on in the kink community that, while the search results are proud of, is detrimental to the rearing of young children.
My desire for you to search that term was actually sincere- there was too much to screen shot or copy/paste.
Kink lifestyles are wholly incompatible with children. Polyamorous Triad Polycule Thruples are not "gay", they are KINK.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:24 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
You’re right. Cornell isn’t scholarly. Cornell is for idiots. What even is Cornell? What does Ivy League mean? Probably something bad in terms of what you would be looking for in something scholarly.
To which of your blind links are you referring?
You already burned me on your first two blind links.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:25 pm to PensaTigers
quote:
Im literally talking about YOUR LINK and quoting it admitting that some of the 75 of 79 studies admitted to small sample sizes and lack of control groups being true. Did i not make that clear enough, dumbass? Now ask yourself what this motivated article DIDNT admit to. So lets go over the points you failed to respond to. A lot of studies are funded by motivated groups for political or falsified scientific gain. A lot of studies can be easily picked apart for not recognizing a variable, excessive failure to recognize the different in causation and coorilation, or a control group that buffs numbers via examples provided by YOUR LINK that explain that low number and exclusive control groups exist in said studies. I graduated from Milton, and im significantly smarter than you. Try to reply with something more than insults, i hate keeping idiots on track during a debate. Always having to hold your little hands to keep your dumbasses on track. Maybe put the bottle down and come back after a good sobering night of sleep buddy.
I’m not your buddy, guy.
Milton is even worse. That’s not Pensacola. Pensacola is escambia county and Milton is Santa Rosa. Don’t claim my city.
You want better links I’ll share them in the morning. Again, feel free to cite something of your own and bring something to the discussion other than comments about my hands.
And how can sample sizes be big you dumb mother frickers? How long have same sex couples been around? How much time do you think they’ve had to get good data on how same sex couples have been able to raise children, much less be allowed to even have them. Use some fricking common sense.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:31 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
And how can sample sizes be big you dumb mother frickers? How long have same sex couples been around? How much time do you think they’ve had to get good data on how same sex couples have been able to raise children, much less be allowed to even have them. Use some fricking common sense.
Ima take you at exactly your word, here, fulbright.
Now... anything you DO post in support of your progressive claims is pretty much pushawed... by YOU.
DonJuan, your petard awaits.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:02 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
I didnt think i was your buddy, it was a sarcasric remark. Youre the only one who didnt get that. Take a lap buddy.
The city doesnt matter. Youre a metaphorical 1:1 ratio of idiocy of a libtard with an art major or gender studies degree making a clearly retarded statement that those with degrees or, in your case, "a better school" is a factual indication of IQ superiority. I could accept your idiocy if you admitted to outliers but nope. Well done. Im sure your drunk arse didnt even understsnd that.
I didnt claim that i had any factual or studied evidence of my side, just that i disagree. Youre the one who thinks your opinion is fact thanks to skewed studies, which you purposefully ignore my critques of, minus the hilarious back padel im about to address below.
Now lastly, you claim these studies should be recognized as facts that relate to the validity of a same sex couple as parents vs the nuclear family, but when i call out the flaw, you get conlficted between "the results are valid representations of reality" while "of course we dont have enough people for a large control group!!"
You arent smart enough to see how fricking retarded you are, proving yourself be so. Not only are you not smarter than me, youre the dumbest fricker in this topic based on upvoted and downvotes alone.
Btw, sonic aint doing so well around here but im down to meet up in milton or pcola. Hope you were also an all state right tackle buddy.
The city doesnt matter. Youre a metaphorical 1:1 ratio of idiocy of a libtard with an art major or gender studies degree making a clearly retarded statement that those with degrees or, in your case, "a better school" is a factual indication of IQ superiority. I could accept your idiocy if you admitted to outliers but nope. Well done. Im sure your drunk arse didnt even understsnd that.
I didnt claim that i had any factual or studied evidence of my side, just that i disagree. Youre the one who thinks your opinion is fact thanks to skewed studies, which you purposefully ignore my critques of, minus the hilarious back padel im about to address below.
Now lastly, you claim these studies should be recognized as facts that relate to the validity of a same sex couple as parents vs the nuclear family, but when i call out the flaw, you get conlficted between "the results are valid representations of reality" while "of course we dont have enough people for a large control group!!"
You arent smart enough to see how fricking retarded you are, proving yourself be so. Not only are you not smarter than me, youre the dumbest fricker in this topic based on upvoted and downvotes alone.
Btw, sonic aint doing so well around here but im down to meet up in milton or pcola. Hope you were also an all state right tackle buddy.
This post was edited on 9/26/25 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:10 pm to PensaTigers
quote:
I didnt think i was your buddy, it was a sarcasric remark. Youre the only one who didnt get that. Take a lap buddy. The city doesnt matter. Youre a metaphorical 1:1 ratio of idiocy of a libtard with an art major or gender studies degree making a clearly retarded statement that those with degrees or, in your case, "a better school" is a factual indication of IQ superiority. I could accept your idiocy if you admitted to outliers but nope. Well done. Im sure your drunk arse didnt even understsnd that. I didnt claim that i had any factual or studied evidence of my side, just that i disagree. Youre the one who thinks your opinion is fact thanks to skewed studies, which you purposefully ignore my critques of, minus the hilarious back padel im about to address below. Now lastly, you claim these studies should be recognized as facts that relate to the validity of a same sex couple as parents vs the nuclear family, but when i call out the flaw, you get conlficted between "the results are valid representations of reality" while "of course we dont have enough people for a large control group!!" You arent smart enough to see how fricking retarded you are, proving yourself be so. Not only are you not smarter than me, youre the dumbest fricker in this topic based on upvoted and downvotes alone. Btw, sonic aint doing so well around here but im down to meet up in milton or pcola. Hope you were also an all state right tackle buddy.
You’re a fricking moron. I didn’t thinking you were serious. It’s a line from South Park’s Terrance and Phillip.
TLDR my intellect isn’t tied or comparative to my downvotes in this thread. I am down to meet you wherever you want.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:12 pm to tiggerthetooth
I feel bad for her mostly b/c the house probably smells like wet butt.
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News