Started By
Message

re: 20 killed in limo accident...18 in the limo

Posted on 10/8/18 at 10:16 am to
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20625 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 10:16 am to
quote:

18 passangers? That was asking for a tragic accident. People can downvote away but one thing wrong with this country is peoples inability to think for themselve


I remember going to prom with 10-12 of us.

You can stop acting like 18 people is an absurd number for a stretch SUV limo.


ETA: This Cadillac Escalade stretch limo holds 20 people. LINK
This post was edited on 10/8/18 at 10:26 am
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59237 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 10:21 am to
quote:

18 passangers?

That was asking for a tragic accident.


Just so I'm understanding this correctly, you are placing the blame on the passengers in the limo?
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 10:38 am to
quote:

you are placing the blame on the passengers in the limo?



Nope

Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7872 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 10:38 am to
quote:

If two vehicles are going 60MPH and hit head on the results are the same as if they were going 60 MPH and hit a parked car or other stationary objet, and not equivalent to a 120 MPH crash which is a common misunderstanding.
My physics and engineering knowledge (M.E. '98) disagrees with you, but I will keep an open mind, and look into this.

quote:

Each car decelerates from 60MPH to 0 during the impact dissipating the same amount of energy as if they each had decelerated from 60 to 0 by hitting a stationary object, there was a "Mythbusters" episode devoted to the physics incolved.
I'd like to see this episode. Your statements imply a number of things that I find hard to believe:

1) if two cars each traveling 25 MPH hit head on, the damage is equivalent to one car hitting a big tree at 25 MPH

2) if a kickoff returner, sprinting at 15 MPH runs into a tackler also running at 15 MPH, the result is equivalent to running into a stationary object at 15 MPH

F = M*A just does not agree with those. However, Mythbusters is a pretty good source, so again, I'd like to see the episode.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59237 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Hey, lets put 18 adults into an extended vehicle. 18 fricking people? That's a minimum of 3k lbs. Plus the weight of extending it? Dumbass driver, dumbass riders. It sucks they died but Dammit people, think.


quote:

18 passangers? That was asking for a tragic accident.


so you're definitely not placing blame on the passengers, ok. Glad we got on the same page
Posted by Thias2685
Member since Sep 2012
2706 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 10:44 am to
quote:

there was a "Mythbusters" episode


I read it on the internet. It must be true.
Posted by Southcoast
Texas
Member since Jan 2004
687 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 10:49 am to
too bad the driver didn't veer off into one of the open fields on the side of the road on the way down, especially if the brakes were out. Unless he didn't know the brakes were out until close to the intersection where there are trees.
This post was edited on 10/8/18 at 10:52 am
Posted by leftovergumbo
Member since May 2018
569 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

if two cars each traveling 25 MPH hit head on, the damage is equivalent to one car hitting a big tree at 25 MPH


Newtons third law. That big tree exerts an equal force on the car.

If two identical cars collide, the force is the same. The only force on each car is the sudden deceleration to 0.
However, the crash has twice the kinetic energy.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105284 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Agree. Imagine that driver if the brakes failed ?Gaining more speed as your going down hill with no way to stop. That road goes downhill for a few miles 
before ending at a cross section road stop sign. 
Makes sense where the car ended up. Im guessing all the victims died on impact at the bottom of the hill. 


Not to Monday morninq QB, but if the brakes failed, one wonders why he didn't throw it in low. He apparently had time, and a 35 mph crash is better than a 60 mph crash.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26608 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Agree. Imagine that driver if the brakes failed


Horrifying to think about, but that's what almost certainly happened. It is an aging truck with a stretched frame that's holding a payload of at least 2-3 times what the engine, transmission, and brakes were designed to handle. That's why limos usually drive slowly and deliberately. They were going downhill on a steep road with a dead stop at the bottom of the hill.

And it likely wasn't maintained particularly well by the owner/operator.

18-20 people (and their drinks, food, lighting, speakers, etc.) should use a party bus built on a Class 5 or Class 6 truck chassis.
This post was edited on 10/8/18 at 12:02 pm
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8684 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 12:20 pm to
Vehicle had failed safety inspection the month before, and the driver didnt have a CDL.

LINK
This post was edited on 10/8/18 at 12:21 pm
Posted by ChineseBandit66
Denver, Colorado
Member since Jul 2013
1794 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

If two identical cars collide, the force is the same. The only force on each car is the sudden deceleration to 0.
However, the crash has twice the kinetic energy.


Posted by bigbowe80
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
3767 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 12:23 pm to
quote:


Horrifying to think about, but that's what almost certainly happened. It is an aging truck with a stretched frame that's holding a payload of at least 2-3 times what the engine, transmission, and brakes were designed to handle. That's why limos usually drive slowly and deliberately. They were going downhill on a steep road with a dead stop at the bottom of the hill.

And it likely wasn't maintained particularly well by the owner/operator.

18-20 people (and their drinks, food, lighting, speakers, etc.) should use a party bus built on a Class 5 or Class 6 truck chassis.

Vehicle had failed safety inspection the month before, and the driver didnt have a CDL


Advertising Info  •  Privacy Policy  •  Where to Watch LSU  •  Contact Us

© 2018 TigerDroppings.com. All Rights Reserved

View in: Mob


So basically this Limo Company is about to be sued into oblivion. It sounds
like every decision they made leading up to the tragedy had disaster written all over it.
From the very old vehicle on a standard excursion frame made into a limo to the fact
that the driver chose to take a very well known steep and dangerous route. Obviously, we are all Monday morning Qbing here— but surely there was some sort of alternative route that would have been relatively similar travel time that could have gotten them to where they needed to go that wouldn’t have been as risky a route?
This post was edited on 10/8/18 at 12:24 pm
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15195 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 12:23 pm to
I've always wondered about those frankie limos.
How much actual engineering is put into structural changes that are made to make a limo out of a regular vehicle.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15195 posts
Posted on 10/8/18 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

That limo must have been pulverized in the crash if all 18 people inside of it were killed.


From the outside it really doesn't look that bad. Guess they were thrown around internally.
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
73723 posts
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:17 am to
this is crazy, and i am not a conspiracy type.. any chance of foul play.. if not by the driver, the company?

i really hate to even entertain that idea. i heard just now the owner of the limo was an informant for terrorism or something.

any ways, absolutely awful tragedy.
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
73723 posts
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:18 am to
Yeah, I heard it failed inspection.

quote:

orrifying to think about, but that's what almost certainly happened. It is an aging truck with a stretched frame that's holding a payload of at least 2-3 times what the engine, transmission, and brakes were designed to handle. That's why limos usually drive slowly and deliberately. They were going downhill on a steep road with a dead stop at the bottom of the hill.


This makes sense.


Man that's going to be an insane lawsuit that I doubt the owner can even afford.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram