- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 20-25 million dollars to fix Washington street exit
Posted on 8/4/16 at 1:52 pm to waiting4saturday
Posted on 8/4/16 at 1:52 pm to waiting4saturday
quote:
If I was Governor, I would fire every DOTD employee and contract Texas' DOTD to do all of our shite. They'd have that exit fixed in 4 months and a new bridge in a year and probably be 1/2 the price.
This.
Louisiana is a banana republic. Always has been.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 1:54 pm to Tigerpaw123
quote:
According to Dr. Shawn Wilson, DOTD secretary, five to seven years is the time frame officials are currently looking at for the project to be completed.
Meanwhile,
in the Netherlands
and Beijing
Posted on 8/4/16 at 1:55 pm to Korkstand
quote:please explain what you mean by this
there would be double the length of highway available to merge from.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 1:58 pm to Womski
Used it this morning. Didn't have coffee so I needed something to wake me up.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:01 pm to Tigerpaw123
quote:
Delays happen often and at odd times - during rush hour and random weekends.
I had no idea rush hour caused traffic and delays.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:02 pm to DallasTiger
quote:
Louisiana is a banana republic. Always has been.
Why work when you get paid not to?
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:02 pm to link
quote:From the painted line that marks the exit, to the point further up the highway where the existing railing makes that "lane" too narrow to exist, it looks like that lane could be extended over 500 feet just by painting new lines.quote:please explain what you mean by this
there would be double the length of highway available to merge from.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:02 pm to Tigerpaw123
5-7 years to complete is the correct time, not construction time but POLITICAL TIME>
This allows for every politician to get mileage out of the project, promise things that will never be delivered, get re-elected then scrap the plan only to allow it to resurface before election time
We have seen this for over 30 years
This allows for every politician to get mileage out of the project, promise things that will never be delivered, get re-elected then scrap the plan only to allow it to resurface before election time
We have seen this for over 30 years
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:05 pm to Topwater Trout
the queue of vehicles that build up at the split is because of the bottleneck, not the exit. the backup caused by a small amount of vehicles trying to weave from 110 to the exit is a drop in the bucket.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:06 pm to Tigerpaw123
It's not going to change a thing.
You heard it here first folks.
You heard it here first folks.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:08 pm to Korkstand
quote:that's called the "recovery area" and is a safety feature for vehicles that bail out of their exit at the last minute and need to get back on. no competent engineer will ever unstripe that just to get 500 more feet of merge.
From the painted line that marks the exit, to the point further up the highway where the existing railing makes that "lane" too narrow to exist, it looks like that lane could be extended over 500 feet just by painting new lines.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:09 pm to link
quote:Did you forget the part of this plan that closes the exit? No "recovery area" needed.
that's called the "recovery area" and is a safety feature for vehicles that bail out of their exit at the last minute and need to get back on. no competent engineer will ever unstripe that just to get 500 more feet of merge.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:16 pm to CarRamrod
quote:That is a given everywhere.
dont think one second Txdot isnt helping out thair cowbaws
The percentage of parasitic loss due to graft, ignorance, always-been-done-like-dat mentality, inefficiency and poor oversight in Louisiana is much greater than in Texas.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:16 pm to Korkstand
500 more feet won't fix it, man. i don't know what else to tell you. i'm the most anti-sjw you'll find, and even i agree that exit is causing no harm as it is, and 500' isn't enough to consider it.
This post was edited on 8/4/16 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:17 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
I had no idea rush hour caused traffic and delays
I thought the same thing when I read that part.
Traffic bottlenecks occur at odd times, like rush hour.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:19 pm to burgeman
quote:
five to seven years
This seems absolutely crazy. It's bad enough that the Baton Rouge interstate and highway system are already based in the stone age. Now they want to throw $20 Million at a bandaid that is going to take 5-7 YEARS to complete.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:21 pm to waiting4saturday
quote:
contract Texas' DOTD to do all of our shite
Yeah because the TX Contractor that did I10 from the split to past Seigen bid such an awesome job.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:27 pm to Tigerpaw123
quote:frick that leave my money alone. Laffy needs that I-49 corridor.
federal money used for work in the Lafayette area would free up money to be used in Baton Rouge.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:32 pm to link
quote:I know it won't, and I said exactly that. But I'm pretty certain that it would alleviate some pressure until a real fix is finished.
500 more feet won't fix it, man.
quote:Considering the left lane coming from 10 only has 500' as it is to move over to give the right lane room to merge, I think doubling that to 1000' would do wonders.
even i agree that exit is causing no harm as it is, and 500' isn't enough to consider it.
If you don't agree, how much runway do you think is required to eliminate that bottleneck? Half a mile? A mile?
As of now, the situation is 2 lanes merging down to 1, offset slightly by 500' of road for the left I-10 lane to trickle over to the left to give the right laners some room. Closing the exit and extending the right lane by 500' would obviously result in twice as much road/time to do the maneuvers. Instead of a major interstate funneling 2 lanes down to 1, it would be more like two 2-lane highways coming together as a 4 lane, then 1000' feet later the right lane merges to make it 3 lanes.
Not ideal, but much, much better. And cheap.
Posted on 8/4/16 at 2:34 pm to Mac
quote:
Laffy needs that I-49 corridor.
Except that they don't want an elevated section and they don't want to tear down that dump between the welcome center and Pinhook to do it.
Popular
Back to top


1








