Started By
Message

re: $16.8 billion LNG project to get started this summer in Lake Charles

Posted on 6/22/21 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
98937 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 12:34 pm to
Houston
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182188 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

That was in place faaarrrr before Governor Honor code. Nice try chode.



Yea the permitting for projects like these start like a decade before they even come to fruition.
Posted by nugget
Abrego Garcia Fan
Member since Dec 2009
15731 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Ahhh come on... what's the issue


He can’t rape his dog in Lake Charles
Posted by EveryoneGetsATrophy
Member since Nov 2017
2907 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Tellurian likely to start construction on Driftwood project this summer


Likely to start?
Posted by Buga_Scores
Member since Jul 2014
1901 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

I saw a tweet about LNG and it was saying the NatGas from Louisiana is poor quality. Can any of you baws confirm?

I can't see this being true with Cheniere exporting over 1,000 ships and Cameron LNG close to 250.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't mind hopping back on the LNG circuit,

Wouldn't Nymeria miss you?
Posted by MWP
Kingwood, TX via Monroe, LA
Member since Jul 2013
11054 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Likely to start?


I would say pretty likely. We bid on a pipeline removal and relocate that goes through this property that is set to start next month.
Posted by Unobtanium
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2009
1917 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 3:04 pm to
Someone help me understand something.

Our progressive leaders in this country don't want us burning natural gas in new power plants to power our homes, industry or the future of transportation (EV's), and many progressive communities are banning NG in new home construction, all in the name of climate change. But it's OK to ship that same natural gas overseas so other countries can fuel their new power plants, heat their homes and cook their food.

What secret am I missing?
This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 3:16 pm
Posted by Captain Want
Member since Nov 2009
2176 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 3:30 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 9:19 am
Posted by 2BRKnot
Member since Jul 2020
468 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Tellurian likely to start construction on Driftwood project this summer

I will believe it if and when I see it.
Posted by Ramblin Wreck
Member since Aug 2011
4215 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 5:05 pm to
It's funny how banks, insurance companies, and investors don't picture a world without oil and gas. Also funny, based on the amount of real estate development along the gulf, that they also don't believe in the rising sea concerns of the environmentalists either. I guess banks and insurance companies know something that we don't.
Posted by Man4others
Member since Aug 2017
2492 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

can't see this being true with Cheniere exporting over 1,000 ships and Cameron LNG close to 250.


Agreed but the tweet was saying the LNG from the ME was higher quality. Wasn’t sure if there was a difference between natgas from USA vs rest of the world.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram