- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:11 pm to Snipe
quote:
I disagree. a young assistant or current capable play caller could look favorably on the Saints situation as the one to turn it around. Also as Ross Jackson stated, NOLA might be an attractive site to a hungry OC because DA is a defensive coach and he will give total control of the offense to his OC unlike what may be the case in some of the franchises replacing their HC this season with likely OC minded HC's
Fair point, but when I hear "hungry OC" I think more of a guy who needs a oppoprtunity and who is therefore willing to take on a tough situation like ours, than a guy who is in demand and has his pick of any OC gig in the league.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 6:47 pm to Laaz2750
True but also none of us know what the market is for coordinators and positions coach’s. Really we don’t even know the market for HCs. We know who we like and who seems like that would want a position be if your not in the NFL coaching circle you don’t know really who is available for what position. Then you don’t know the parameters of that potential coaches interest in coaching.
The guys I named are guys that have a resume or have shown the potential to handle the job. I have no idea if the would be interested in 1) the Saint position or 2) even if they would be interested in any other position other than what they have.
That’s why all this is speculation to outsiders. Which is what I assume we all are.
The guys I named are guys that have a resume or have shown the potential to handle the job. I have no idea if the would be interested in 1) the Saint position or 2) even if they would be interested in any other position other than what they have.
That’s why all this is speculation to outsiders. Which is what I assume we all are.
Posted on 1/2/24 at 7:28 pm to Snipe
Oline and dline coaches both need to leave
Saints are getting destroyed in trenches and that’s where it all starts
See what vets you can trade or move on from
Kamara Thomas peat Ruiz Jordan lattimore need restructuring or move on
Saints are getting destroyed in trenches and that’s where it all starts
See what vets you can trade or move on from
Kamara Thomas peat Ruiz Jordan lattimore need restructuring or move on
Posted on 1/3/24 at 6:04 am to nicholastiger
quote:
See what vets you can trade or move on from
Kamara Thomas peat Ruiz Jordan lattimore need restructuring or move on
I don't think it's financially possible to trade any of those players since the restructured last off season. In general.
I was under the impressions that Thomas re negotiated his contract last season making it a 1 year prove it deal with an out if he didn't perform. That was true but not true. The contract was structured for him to be able to be traded or released but apparently there was a window for that to take place post June 1st 2023 and some point before the 2023/2024 season started. It's my assumption that they may have been looking for a trade partner for him but didn't get any takers and/or when Tre'Quan Smith and Rashid Shaheed spent a significant amount of time injured in training camp they got cold feet about moving on from Thomas. As it sits now, ad as I understand it his contract became locked in until after the 2024 season.
Kamara could have some trade value but neither Williams or Miller have given any confidence that they can take over. (Caveat, Kamara may demand a trade if changes aren't made. He was visibly pissed off most of the season and there was no ambiguity about who he blamed.)
Peat played himself into another contract with the Saints IMO because who else you got to play LT? Ruiz's contract was set up to maybe part ways with him after this season, but again who else is there?
Jordan's contract counts 36 million against the 2024 cap id he's traded or cut. He's not leaving short of retiring.
Lattimore is the only one with real trade value of hte vets, but again his contract is structurally a mess for any team trading for him so you'd basically have to give him away then how do you replace him?
IMO we'll see a lot of the same roster next season while the team burns through all this dead cap money.
The good news is IMO the only real must haves are OT, Edge Rusher and maybe depth at O-line and Safety which we can surely address in the draft.
If they do the right thing and overhaul the offensive coaching staff I think a new staff can get 3 more wins out of this offense. They puts the Saints in the driver's seat of the NFC South next season I think.
Another staff area that really needs to be scrutinized is the strength and conditioning group. Are they really giving the team the best possible chance each week?
Now yes I agree the play and development of the o-line and d-line have not been close to where it should be. Doug Marrone is a top tier O-line coach, I'm not sure what's happening there but it may be time for a change. Grantham is in his first year coaching D-line so I'm not sure what realistically I should have expected from him or if he failed. However Brian Young has had 8 season to coach pass rush and while the Saints have had some great years under him on getting to the QB, the production has definitely fallen off in the past 2 or 3 years and Foskey's non-development doesn't add much confidence. Cam is in his twilight and Granderson looks to be the real deal. Nothing else to even talk about which is why that group needs to be a 1st rd priority.
Posted on 1/3/24 at 2:56 pm to Laaz2750
quote:
I imagine that it’s going to be hard to hire a good OC… surely it’s common knowledge that DA will be coaching for his life next year and will likely fail… who wants to be a part of that?
I see it as just the opposite. The situation with the saints is a dream job for an OC. The HC is a defensive guy so the OC has nearly full control of his side of the ball. Another plus is that the D is better as the O becomes more efficient and threatening.
If you are a good OC then you will shine as a potential HC candidate because what happens on offense is your baby.
Posted on 1/3/24 at 3:19 pm to fwtex
quote:
I see it as just the opposite. The situation with the saints is a dream job for an OC.
Having a Derek Carr as your quarterback is not a dream job. Its more like a nightmare.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 5:43 am to Pels_Yaz
quote:
Having a Derek Carr as your quarterback is not a dream job. Its more like a nightmare.
Not really.
Plenty of teams have competed and even won championships with mid tier QBs. They just designed offenses to take advantage of their strengths and minimize their weaknesses.
Nick Foles
Russell Wilson
Joe Flacco
Matt Stafford
Brad Johnson
Trent Dilfer
Mark Rypien
Jeff Hostetler
Doug Williams
Jim McMahon
All Average QB's that had systems that allowed them to excel and a group Derek Carr aligns with talent wise.
Now if you want to question whether or not this franchise has the ability to surround Carr with type and quality coaches to make him what these other QB's became then thats a better argument. But to say you can never win with Carr is just not true.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:22 am to Snipe
IMO, you fire the entire offensive staff outside of Kodi Burns. Every position group regressed under this coaching staff. QB play was erratic, the line is an abortion, the running backs sucked, and I am not sure if we have any TEs on the roster. WR is the only position you can point to as having some development, but even that is spotty with Olave being hit or miss.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:40 am to saints5021
quote:
IMO, you fire the entire offensive staff outside of Kodi Burns. Every position group regressed under this coaching staff. QB play was erratic, the line is an abortion, the running backs sucked, and I am not sure if we have any TEs on the roster. WR is the only position you can point to as having some development, but even that is spotty with Olave being hit or miss.
No argument here. The play calling and development of the O-Line have been some of the worst I've seen in the NFL. That filtered down into the every aspect of the offense.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 10:46 am to Snipe
I agree, the OLine draft picks have been terrible outside of Ramcyk, trade Peat's fat arse while he has value, some value anyways. Ruiz is still not that good imo and the center ha his issues as well. I won't even go there with Penning right now, I just don't understand how they could miss on all of these draft picks at the OLine.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 11:23 am to tucoco
quote:
OLine draft picks have been terrible outside of Ramcyk
I don't really see it like that.
McCoy (great pick) was a needed pick to replace Max Unger who medically retired unexpectedly in 2019. Cesar Ruiz was drafted from what I heard to replace McCoy at center and have McCoy slide to RG to replace Larry Wofford but McCoy was better than expected at center and the decided to keep the continuity between he and Brees and play Ruiz out of position ar RG. Ruiz struggled and still struggles to hold down the guard spot but what should have happened is in 2021 after Breed had retired that was the time to flip McCoy and Ruiz as McCoy is iirc the better fit talent wise to move to guard. But they were hanging onto win now mode so the less changes the better I guess.
Anders Peat was a reach to replace Zack Strief but they needed to take a shot. When he didn't work out they needed to get Ram and Peat carved out a nice career moving inside to guard. (3 pro bowls least you forget).
Nothing on paper even hinted at Penning seeming like a massive bust (I still have hope for him with the right coaches)
Of the rest you have Rick Leonard, Will Clapp, Landon Young and Nick Saldiveri of those Will Clapp was probably the best and could have developed into something. Saldiveri in the 4th was a head scratcher like Rick Leonard was but it showed the desperation to fix the O-line.
The reality is this draft they have to keep going to the O-line well because as the O-line goes so will Carr and the offense.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 11:32 am to Snipe
Majority of those qbs are not from this decade and are much better than Carr to begin with.
Stafford is not a mid tier qb and is much better than Carr as we just saw in the last rams game we faced. Young prime russell wilson was much better than Carr, current Wilson is just like Carr and was dumped. Foles took over midseason for Wentz- but there was no sustainability with that.
I will say again you cannot win on a high level with Carr. But go ahead if you think hes the next Trent Dilfer or Brad Johnson lol.
Stafford is not a mid tier qb and is much better than Carr as we just saw in the last rams game we faced. Young prime russell wilson was much better than Carr, current Wilson is just like Carr and was dumped. Foles took over midseason for Wentz- but there was no sustainability with that.
I will say again you cannot win on a high level with Carr. But go ahead if you think hes the next Trent Dilfer or Brad Johnson lol.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 11:42 am to Pels_Yaz
quote:
I will say again you cannot win on a high level with Carr. But go ahead if you think hes the next Trent Dilfer or Brad Johnson lol.
I don't think Carr will be the next anyone. I don't even think Carr will be a much considerably player with the right coaching staff. I do think with the right staff he can be much more consistent player and not having to rely on him to do things above and beyond his normal capabilities will translate into more success for the Saints.
And not a QB on that list was more talented (By any large margin) than Derek Carr. What they had was better systems to work within and thus they had better results.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 11:53 am to Snipe
Stafford and young Russell Wilson are much much better qbs than Carr- if you can’t see that I don’t know what to tell you.
The raiders did everything that you’re saying for years to build around Carr- he got them a first round playoff loss. Hes not a winning qb and no staff will make him better than he was his whole career. Wasting years to do this with Carr is an absolute waste of time for this franchise.
The raiders did everything that you’re saying for years to build around Carr- he got them a first round playoff loss. Hes not a winning qb and no staff will make him better than he was his whole career. Wasting years to do this with Carr is an absolute waste of time for this franchise.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 12:02 pm to Suntiger
The most “Loomisy” thing would be fo him to bring back CSP.
I’m in no way saying that’s realistic.
I’m in no way saying that’s realistic.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 12:07 pm to Pels_Yaz
Carr was a much better QB when he was under Gruden, Gruden gave him good confidence and knew how to use him, play him up to his strengths and all.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 12:13 pm to Snipe
Hire Drew Brees to be involved in the offense in someway. Get rid of Carmichael, Give DA one more shot. Fire mid-season if same results. Promote Taysom to starting QB. Build offense around him and playbook.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 12:21 pm to tucoco
quote:
Carr was a much better QB when he was under Gruden, Gruden gave him good confidence and knew how to use him, play him up to his strengths and all.
They were 8-8 in Gruden’s best year with Carr. Hmm whats our record so far this year with Carr? Oh wait we’re 8-8.
Popular
Back to top


0





