- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would you draft this?
Posted on 5/24/19 at 9:48 am
Posted on 5/24/19 at 9:48 am
If so, which round?
Here are the 4 year numbers:
RB
Year1-
Rushing: 155 attempts, 565yds, 3.6ypc, 6TD
Receiving: 88receptions, 742yds, 8.4ypr, 2TD
Year2-
Rushing: 157att, 581yds, 3.7ypc, 4TD
Receiving: 73rec, 417yds, 5.7ypr, 2TD
Year3-
Rushing: 106att, 404yds, 3.8ypc, 2TD
Receiving: 52rec, 440yds, 8.5ypr, 4TD
Year4-
Rushing: 70att, 390yds, 5.6ypc, 5TD
Receiving: 47rec, 335yds, 7.1ypr, 3TD
Here are the 4 year numbers:
RB
Year1-
Rushing: 155 attempts, 565yds, 3.6ypc, 6TD
Receiving: 88receptions, 742yds, 8.4ypr, 2TD
Year2-
Rushing: 157att, 581yds, 3.7ypc, 4TD
Receiving: 73rec, 417yds, 5.7ypr, 2TD
Year3-
Rushing: 106att, 404yds, 3.8ypc, 2TD
Receiving: 52rec, 440yds, 8.5ypr, 4TD
Year4-
Rushing: 70att, 390yds, 5.6ypc, 5TD
Receiving: 47rec, 335yds, 7.1ypr, 3TD
Posted on 5/24/19 at 9:52 am to Midget Death Squad
4th round, maybe 3rd.
no reason for bush to be a 1st round pick.
no reason for bush to be a 1st round pick.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 9:52 am to Midget Death Squad
1st round. Second overall.
(This is Reggie Bush)
(This is Reggie Bush)
Posted on 5/24/19 at 9:56 am to RightHook
quote:
4th round, maybe 3rd.
Fair. Stats say 5th or later, but the talent potential bumps to a 4th maybe 3rd for me as well.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:05 am to stniaSxuaeG
quote:
1st round. Second overall.
duh. i'm winning a super bowl with this guy.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:07 am to Midget Death Squad
This is exactly why you can't draft solely on statistics. The end result does not equal that of the effect he had on the game each time he stepped on the field.
ETA: I'm aware these are NFL stats. Also, where are his return numbers?
ETA: I'm aware these are NFL stats. Also, where are his return numbers?
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 10:08 am
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:13 am to Spelt it rong
quote:
This is exactly why you can't draft solely on statistics. The end result does not equal that of the effect he had on the game each time he stepped on the field.
ETA: I'm aware these are NFL stats. Also, where are his return numbers?
So you're saying statistics, meaning what a player actually does on the field, don't matter? Based on these stats, where would you draft this player?
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:25 am to Midget Death Squad
As soon as I saw the 88 receptions year one. Dead give away.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:30 am to Midget Death Squad
quote:
So you're saying statistics, meaning what a player actually does on the field, don't matter?
I believe I said solely, so no, that's not what I'm saying. I'm simply stating that you have to take more into account than those numbers.
quote:Probably 2nd or 3rd round based on numbers alone.
Based on these stats, where would you draft this player?
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:42 am to Spelt it rong
quote:
I believe I said solely, so no, that's not what I'm saying. I'm simply stating that you have to take more into account than those numbers.
Fair enough.
quote:
Probably 2nd or 3rd round based on numbers alone.
I think you are being very generous due to knowing who the player is. While it is quite obvious, the point of the exercise is to try and look strictly at the data and not the person himself.
I really doubt you would honestly select this player with a second round pick based on these stats. I think your fan bias is still influencing your choice.
The only telling number is the 88 receptions. That is a great number in and of itself; however, it didn't hold up over time, and the rest of the stats don't show anything to chance such a high selection.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:49 am to Midget Death Squad
If I were the GM of the Saints and have prime Drew Brees as my QB, any back that can catch is heavily considered.
If I were the GM of the Jets, no way in hell am I drafting a pass-catching RB because he doesn't fit my scheme and my QB sucks.
I think this is a multivariate decision and simply resorting to statistics, though they are the ultimate foundation for quantifying a players' career, is unjust.
If I were the GM of the Jets, no way in hell am I drafting a pass-catching RB because he doesn't fit my scheme and my QB sucks.
I think this is a multivariate decision and simply resorting to statistics, though they are the ultimate foundation for quantifying a players' career, is unjust.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:54 am to RightHook
quote:
4th round, maybe 3rd.
no reason for bush to be a 1st round pick.
Is this hindsight speaking? Did you watch him in college? He was absolutely fascinating and owned nearly everyone he went up against. To this day, everyone questions why he wasn't at least on the field as a distraction when USC failed to convert the 4th down and 1 against UT. From the time he stepped onto the field he required at least two defenders to key on him because he was that dangerous.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 11:26 am to Spelt it rong
quote:
This is exactly why you can't draft solely on statistics. The end result does not equal that of the effect he had on the game each time he stepped on the field
This cannot be said enough. You cannot truly put a number to the affect he had on the passing game. When watching replays, you could literally see LBers following him as he went in motion and then we would have Colston or Moore come open right where the LBer vacated the space.
And as someone else alluded to, we won a SB because of him. If not for his performance in the AZ game, we may not win that game. Is that AZ win that was the 1st step to a SB worth a 1st round pick 3 years ago?
Posted on 5/24/19 at 1:05 pm to Midget Death Squad
now add in the kicking game stats and the drawn double teams!!
Posted on 5/24/19 at 1:15 pm to Spelt it rong
quote:
He was absolutely fascinating and owned nearly everyone he went up against.
he went up against two decent defenses all year.
i thought he was a rich man's jarius norwood. that's pretty much what he was.
said he should be taken in the 3rd round, maybe end of second before the draft.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:38 pm to Midget Death Squad
Reggie! Reggie! Reggie!
Posted on 5/30/19 at 11:47 am to Midget Death Squad
Reggie impacted the game in more ways than as a pure RB. Durability was his biggest problem here. Seemed like everytime Reggie would get into a groove he came down with an injury that would linger for weeks.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 7:02 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
And as someone else alluded to, we won a SB because of him.
I'd argue that Pierre Thomas had more of an impact that year than Reggie did.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 11:39 am to Midget Death Squad
What conference so I can judge level of competition.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:34 pm to Midget Death Squad
Some of y'all clearly have tunnel vision. His numbers were underwhelming, yes, but he always had to be accounted for. Defenses played differently with Bush in the game. His unique skill set alone opened up our offense tremendously. He took enormous pressure off of our WRs, allowing Brees to exploit one on one matchups all day long.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News