Started By
Message

re: The case for and against Michael Thomas

Posted on 6/25/19 at 11:19 am to
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
25655 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Signing him is a move to protect the future without Drew at this point

and that's a pretty important thing, IMO... the next QB will need all the help we can afford them, to come in and produce at a level that has become the expectation...
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
57020 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

don't make asinine statements


the whole thread is asinine because we would never not re sign arguably the best receiver in the league.

we would be a laughing stock if we released him, will never happen.

to say "there is a case against" resigning Thomas is asinine because we would never not sign him.
Posted by BeachDude022
Premium Elite Platinum TD Member
Member since Dec 2006
36369 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 2:09 pm to
So what happens when Drew retires and we have MT as the highest paid WR in the league with a possible subpar QB? Not a good idea.

ETA: the reason I say that is because I compare it to situations like Marino leaving the dolphins. It’s been 19 years and they haven’t found a replacement. Same with Kelly and the Bills. Not everyone can get rid of a legend, a la Favre, and have a Rodgers step in. It’s rare.
This post was edited on 6/25/19 at 2:36 pm
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
26917 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 3:23 pm to
Just pay him, he will be needed for future qb even if it is TB
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16049 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

ust pay him, he will be needed for future qb even if it is TB


and that future QB will need a good OL ($$$$$) blocking for him, a good RB, like Kamara also $$$$$$$$ very soon. A good TE and more than just one good WR would also help which also could cost money.

Also who is to say that we don't go on the free agent market for this future QB which also will take plenty of money under the salary cap. I am just not sure it is prudent to tie up that big a chunk of the salary cap on one WR, no matter how good he may be.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16049 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

The Saints have to decide whether or not it’s worth it to tie up that much money in one area of the team and cause the other areas to suffer

exactly. If we pay MT $22 mill, we would have 25% of our total player payroll tied up in the QB and one WR.

quote:

Can we afford to give Alvin Kamara or any other star this kind of money in a couple of years?


In the not to distant future it is going to take a pretty big chunk to get him resigned as well and he is every bit as important to this offense as MT is.

To say there is no case against resigning him just is not true. There is a lot to consider here.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
68929 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

6 years ago Drew is not current Drew, he needs a playmaking wr


I don’t get how this is so hard for many to understand.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
70877 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 4:14 pm to
So what happens when we let MT go and our receivers don't step up and Drew has sh!t to throw too? As you said it's not easy to replace the best of the best.
I'll take your scenario 10 out of 10 times.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
8185 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

the whole thread is asinine because we would never not re sign arguably the best receiver in the league. we would be a laughing stock if we released him, will never happen. to say "there is a case against" resigning Thomas is asinine because we would never not sign him.


You didn’t exactly provide any support for your argument right here. You just made a bunch of emotional statements.

I bet you wanted the Saints to give Jimmy Graham a huge deal and keep him around a few years back. The Saints refused to do so and came out on top of the deal when they traded his contract away.
This post was edited on 6/25/19 at 6:15 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

MT is worth every penny of $22 mill, just don't think it would be prudent for the Saints to tie up that kind of money on one player other than at QB. Hate to see him go though. Tough call to make, but great teams (the Patriots) make those kind of calls when they have to be made.

What do you think they should cap the offer at annually?
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
35523 posts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:18 pm to
Saints at 18

MT at 22

Give the man 20
Posted by Milesahead
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
681 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 5:42 am to
Of course there is a case against signing him. A case can be made that 2 10 mil WRs would be more prudent than keeping just MT at 20 mil.

I would franchise and kick the can down the road. Not popular with the player but if he acts crazy, u can trade him and get something for him.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
70877 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:56 am to
quote:

but if he acts crazy


Whats crazy is that MT has had the best first three years in NFL history.
Whats crazy is he led the NFL in fewest drops.
Whats crazy is he scares the sh!t out of most cb's.


How many time have you seen a cb bow up on Mike? Anyone?
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
34613 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 10:40 am to
MT 125 receptions
Kamara 81 receptions
Watson 35 receptions
T. Smith 28 receptions
Ingram 21 receptions
Ginn 17 receptions
J. Hill 16 receptions
Kirkwood 13 receptions
Dan Arnold 12 receptions
Meredith 9 receptions
Carr 9 receptions
Z. Line 5 receptions
TLL 3 receptions
T. Hill 3 receptions

He’s the #1 WR in the NFL in catch rate at 82.9%.
26 years old.
2 Pro Bowls & 1 All Pro in 3 years.
Started 48 of 51 games in his three years in the NFL. (No injuries as of date)

Pay him his $20M a year and win the Super Bowl in 2019.

/thread
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
70877 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 10:55 am to
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
65683 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 6:06 pm to
Thomas has had a couple of great seasons, and I like the guy. However,I don’t think he really stretches the field like some of the more elite receivers.

20 mm. Is a lot of dough to invest in Michael.
I would love to keep him in a perfect world,
but I just don’t know.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 6:10 pm
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
34613 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

don’t think he really stretches the field like some of the more elite receivers.


VOR, I know you’re old so I’ll take it easy on you. But 1) he can stretch the field if needed. That’s just not typically the Saints game. Brees isn’t throwing the ball 40-50 yards multiple times a game. 72 yard TD. 2) Our stretch the field guys have been complimentary WRs, not our main receiving threats (see D. Henderson, J. Morgan, TLL, & T. Ginn). 3) Stretching the field is overrated for WR. Would you rather have MT13 or Tyler Lockett, Brandin Cooks, Stefon Diggs or OBJ. Michael Thomas all day every day.

He’s worth $20M. That’s the market. Pay it quick so all those other WRs demand more and make his contract look like a deal.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram