Started By
Message

re: Steelers had the fix on them

Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:44 pm to
Posted by TigersFan64
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2014
4755 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

The Bills have been trying to take Gronk's knee's out for years...


I sincerely hope that the Bills or some other team takes Thug Gronkowski's knee/knees out and ends his career. He's a thug and deserves to be taken out. I will be laughing my butt off if it does happen!
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 7:45 pm
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72929 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 8:01 pm to
Wow.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 8:42 pm to
They like all these vague rules as they allow them to call whatever the tuck they want and screw everyone according to wishes of Roger the dodger gotohell
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38382 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

"Pretty Boy" Brady


You keep saying this. That’s not his nickname and nobody calls him that. Is there something you would like to get out of the clos...I mean off your chest?
Posted by TigersFan64
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2014
4755 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 8:18 am to
Dirty playing thugs like Gronkowski deserve it. So save your self-righteous "wow." It means nothing to me. I doubt you had anything to say about your boy when he gave Tre White a concussion on his vicious, totally dirty late hit.
This post was edited on 12/18/17 at 8:21 am
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16774 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:52 pm to
Right call. Questionable rule.

You must control the ball through the ground. He didn't.

And he didnt established himself prior which is key: it would have made it a TD as soon as the ball crossed the plane.

Think about it this way. If that play didn't happen in the end zone, it's incomplete. Or if it came loose from a defender making the hit (instead of the ground) just as the receiver came down with ththe ball, it's incomplete.

You have to establish possession where losing it would make it a fumble. He never established possession.

This post was edited on 12/18/17 at 1:54 pm
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11304 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

They like all these vague rules as they allow them to call whatever the tuck they want and screw everyone according to wishes of Roger the dodger gotohell


Anything but this writing of the rule would do that. This literally is the least vague version of the rule possible. Would you prefer the refs use the “know it when I see it” standard of defining a catch in order to create more consistent enforcement?
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11304 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

bet if it's against your team that happens to you're furious and saying it's a catch. Don't downplay the fact that they cheat for the patriots just because it's not your team getting cheated



The rule was enforced properly, so I’m not sure how they cheated?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram