- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/13/15 at 3:28 pm to SATNIGHTS
I think we overpaid. Hopefully it works out, but this almost guarantees that Khiry Robinson walks in a year. We're not paying him now.
I'd rather have rolled with Ingram/Pierre/Khiry and spent just a fraction of the Spiller money to re-sign Walker.
Overall, I still like the Spiller move more than the Stills trade which blows imo.
I'd rather have rolled with Ingram/Pierre/Khiry and spent just a fraction of the Spiller money to re-sign Walker.
Overall, I still like the Spiller move more than the Stills trade which blows imo.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 3:32 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
I just went from liking this pickup to hating it. Spiller is not worth that to this team.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 3:40 pm to Tingle
Didn't both spiller and PT have around 300 rushing yards last season with Thomas catching a lot more balls. How do these moves make sense?
Posted on 3/13/15 at 3:43 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
could be back loaded with that 4th year option.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 3:54 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
We're fine cap wise. We can be over until preseason and have plenty of options left to get under if needed.
This is not true. Your top 51 has to be under the cap. After preseason your top 53 plus the practice sqaud players have to be under the cap.
That said, we are still under the cap (not by much, waiting on Ellerbe's numbers).
Posted on 3/13/15 at 3:54 pm to Snakebucket
quote:
Didn't both spiller and PT have around 300 rushing yards last season with Thomas catching a lot more balls. How do these moves make sense?
Spiller is an explosive player. A larger sproles with elite speed.
Spiller is younger. PT is a balanced runner and an elite screen back, but he can't blow by people on a dump off pass like spiller can
Posted on 3/13/15 at 3:55 pm to Snakebucket
quote:
Didn't both spiller and PT have around 300 rushing yards last season with Thomas catching a lot more balls. How do these moves make sense?
quite possibly the dumbest post today. you do realize that stats don't mean shite about the play style of the player right? also you really don't think comparing a RB that was in IR after 4 games to another one that played 10 is an accurate comparison, do you? you're a fool
Posted on 3/13/15 at 4:01 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
This is not true. Your top 51 has to be under the cap. After preseason your top 53 plus the practice sqaud players have to be under the cap.
That said, we are still under the cap (not by much, waiting on Ellerbe's numbers).
How much, if any, do we need to save up in case we have 10 new rookies coming in (plus potential udfa, although they are probably not in the top 51 right)?
Posted on 3/13/15 at 4:16 pm to TigerBait1127
Seems like I like this move more than most. Spiller can do a lot of things offensively and special teams wise. And he definitely can take it to the house from any where on the field.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 4:21 pm to lurkoutloud
Any money udfa's or rookies after the third round make is for league minimum or a little bit more. So if the stick they'll only add a couple of hundred thousand max but likely less(because they are replacing someone else's contract).
Now two first round round going to cost a bit, third rounders not much more than rounds 4-7.
But we'll make the room. Loomis knows what he's doing.
Now two first round round going to cost a bit, third rounders not much more than rounds 4-7.
But we'll make the room. Loomis knows what he's doing.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 4:23 pm to kingbob
quote:
I just went from liking this pickup to hating it. Spiller is not worth that to this team.
Yeah, I'm not sure I like this move as much now. You just pissed off Ingram for a guy who we hope stays healthy. Do we really need another player moping ala Jimmy? I just don't get why the Saints would pay him more?
So does that mean we just went from having Ingram pound the rock to playing a 50/50 role with Spiller? The whole point of keeping and paying Ingram a nice contract was to make him a feature back, right?
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:09 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
The whole point of keeping and paying Ingram a nice contract was to make him a feature back, right?
I'm sure Ingram realizes no one in the league considers him to be an elite back. Spiller gives us that big time RB.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:19 pm to Hurricane Mike
With Brees and health, Spiller will shine in this offense. What's best, he won't be asked to be an every down or 20 carry back. He'll be a dangerous complimentary weapon similar to PT, possibly better.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 8:49 pm to kingbob
Spiller > Sproles and will be used a ton. You will change your tune once he takes a screen pass for a 70 yard td.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 9:01 pm to Starchild
quote:
What's best, he won't be asked to be an every down or 20 carry back. He'll be a dangerous complimentary weapon similar to PT, possibly better.
So we're paying him $4.5mm for that? And as mentioned it's more than Ingram is getting. I really like getting Spiller, but not for the price. Ingram is getting $10mm guaranteed, so now you have a pissed off RB who can just mope around and he's sill getting his.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 9:03 pm to Sho Nuff
Know who the odd man out is? Khiry.
I see us splitting Spiller wide just like we did with Bush and Sproles. Ingram and him will get the bulk of the playing time, but if Khiry is worth anything on the market I would flip him for something.
I see us splitting Spiller wide just like we did with Bush and Sproles. Ingram and him will get the bulk of the playing time, but if Khiry is worth anything on the market I would flip him for something.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 9:04 pm to htran90
Need some back up on the team. How many RB's you want to carry?
Posted on 3/13/15 at 9:29 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Need some back up on the team. How many RB's you want to carry?
Yeldon as my 3rd RB.
Seriously, just because the meltdown would be beautiful.
Posted on 3/13/15 at 9:31 pm to htran90
Kriry is cheap and we got the explosive playmaker in the backfield I was wanting.
If Lorig stinks it up in camp he could be gone and Austin take over with a FB on the P.S..
Back to top
