- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Rules question relating to Super Bowl
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:59 pm
I have a question, will ask here because it's got more people on it than the More Sports board.
After the penalty, KC ran the ball on 1st down, Philly didn't try to tackle him and he went down at the 1 or so.
Philly didn't tackle, because their only chance was to let them score fast, get the ball back with some time, and try to score themselves.
Here's the question: there WERE Eagles defenders near the back... could they have grabbed him, and pulled him into the endzone?
I'm asking legal RULES, not 'spirit of the game';
You hold him up, so he can't get a knee down.
You're going into the endzone- so technically, no loss of forward progress. I mean, hell, they score on the play... I'm pretty sure there's nothing in the rulebook preventing THAT outcome.
I guess maybe an "Unsportsmanlike Conduct" could apply, but that's a stretch.
Anyone know for sure?
After the penalty, KC ran the ball on 1st down, Philly didn't try to tackle him and he went down at the 1 or so.
Philly didn't tackle, because their only chance was to let them score fast, get the ball back with some time, and try to score themselves.
Here's the question: there WERE Eagles defenders near the back... could they have grabbed him, and pulled him into the endzone?
I'm asking legal RULES, not 'spirit of the game';
You hold him up, so he can't get a knee down.
You're going into the endzone- so technically, no loss of forward progress. I mean, hell, they score on the play... I'm pretty sure there's nothing in the rulebook preventing THAT outcome.
I guess maybe an "Unsportsmanlike Conduct" could apply, but that's a stretch.
Anyone know for sure?
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:04 pm to Scoob
What if they would have held him up and someone kicked him, while he still held the ball, through the opposing uprights? Would that have counted as a field goal?
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:08 pm to UncleLester
He gave himself up, play is dead.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:11 pm to UncleLester
quote:
What if they would have held him up and someone kicked him, while he still held the ball, through the opposing uprights? Would that have counted as a field goal?
Thanks I needed a laugh.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:17 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:Yeah, I saw that. I posted on the other thread just now-
He gave himself up, play is dead.
Eagles #24 is right there, jogging and zero effort to tackle.
KC rb runs past him... doesn't immediately slide, he turns upfield.
In the split second before he then slides, can #24 grab him, and carry him in for the score?
I'm trying to find a GIF, I can only find video of the play.
We know the rules- in any other circumstance, if the defender makes contact, and that back goes into the endzone, it's a score. He pulls the defender in with him.
In this case, he doesn't WANT to score, but - so what? Can he just yell "I give" and forward progress is stopped?
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:18 pm to Scoob
From NFL rule book:
Forward Progress: The point on the field where the forward momentum of a player who is in possession of the football is stopped by a defender or by going out of bounds. A player is awarded the most forward spot the runner reached when the ball is declared dead even if he is pushed backward.
So if the player was being held up, the officials would probably rule down and mark forward progress.
The only way I could see what you are suggesting working would have been if the Eagles defenders would have slung or pushed the RB in the end zone as part of the tackle. Given the rule, I don’t think an Eagles DB could have picked up the RB and carried him into the end zone - likely would have been ruled down (by forward progress) but it’s an interesting question.
Forward Progress: The point on the field where the forward momentum of a player who is in possession of the football is stopped by a defender or by going out of bounds. A player is awarded the most forward spot the runner reached when the ball is declared dead even if he is pushed backward.
So if the player was being held up, the officials would probably rule down and mark forward progress.
The only way I could see what you are suggesting working would have been if the Eagles defenders would have slung or pushed the RB in the end zone as part of the tackle. Given the rule, I don’t think an Eagles DB could have picked up the RB and carried him into the end zone - likely would have been ruled down (by forward progress) but it’s an interesting question.
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:32 pm to PlacerCoTiger
quote:
stopped by a defender or by going out of bounds. A player is awarded the most forward spot the runner reached when the ball is declared dead even if he is pushed backward.
You’re missing that he’s being literally held up and pushed forward, the momentum is not stopped
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:33 pm to PlacerCoTiger
Watch the play here
LINK
You see KC #1 (the RB) go past Philly #24, and then turn upfield. #24 is jogging, not running; no attempt to tackle.
Let's say #24 does run, and when the back turns upfield- he grabs him (around the waist, say), and run/dives into the endzone.
The rule you cite states:
Ok- #24 doesn't STOP forward progress. He isn't pushed backwards... he is pushed (carried) FORWARD. Into the endzone.
Look at this- it's about as close as I could find.
Let's say that's the play last night. Let's say the RB wanted to go down, but the DB pushed him in. What's the call?
LINK
You see KC #1 (the RB) go past Philly #24, and then turn upfield. #24 is jogging, not running; no attempt to tackle.
Let's say #24 does run, and when the back turns upfield- he grabs him (around the waist, say), and run/dives into the endzone.
The rule you cite states:
quote:
Forward Progress: The point on the field where the forward momentum of a player who is in possession of the football is stopped by a defender or by going out of bounds. A player is awarded the most forward spot the runner reached when the ball is declared dead even if he is pushed backward.
Ok- #24 doesn't STOP forward progress. He isn't pushed backwards... he is pushed (carried) FORWARD. Into the endzone.
Look at this- it's about as close as I could find.
Let's say that's the play last night. Let's say the RB wanted to go down, but the DB pushed him in. What's the call?
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:34 pm to Proximo
No. The play was over when he purposefully gave himself up, just like when a QB slides.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:37 pm to geauxpurple
the hypothetical isn't what actually happened. it's whether the defender can come up and hold him up from going down before he initiates it
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:01 pm to Scoob
Yes if they had grabbed him before he gave himself up and tackling him into the EZ or pushed him in before forward progress is stopped it’s a touchdown. Same as when a play looks done but a scrum keeps pushing forward.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:10 pm to Scoob
quote:
Let's say that's the play last night. Let's say the RB wanted to go down, but the DB pushed him in. What's the call?
I think it would be a TD. At that point, in this scenario, he didn't give himself up so the play is still live. The question is, is there a rule about picking up a player. Because I'd imagine the RB would try to just drop to the ground, so the defender would need to lift him for the next 5ish yards (don't recall where the RB broke containment).
Then the league would overreact and discuss it with the rules committee and make a ridiculous overreaction clarification starting next season.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:17 pm to Vinny V
Rewatching that play
LINK
the running back was playing with fire there. If you watch the play, it starts just outside the 10 yd line. He is running past #24 at the 7 yd line, and turning from an OOB angle, to straight at the goal. At the 5 yd area, that looks like the spot where my proposed scenario happens.
He doesn't go into a slide until the 2, so that's a 7-8 yd gain.
LINK
the running back was playing with fire there. If you watch the play, it starts just outside the 10 yd line. He is running past #24 at the 7 yd line, and turning from an OOB angle, to straight at the goal. At the 5 yd area, that looks like the spot where my proposed scenario happens.
He doesn't go into a slide until the 2, so that's a 7-8 yd gain.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:31 pm to Scoob
24 should have stayed full speed and rode him out of bounds. After seeing the slow-mo/stopped footage, there was no way to get him in the endzone outside of literally picking him up and walking 5+ yards
But, he could have grabbed him from his right side and held him up while pushing him OOB
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:45 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:They'd be trying to do, basically, this
24 should have stayed full speed and rode him out of bounds. After seeing the slow-mo/stopped footage, there was no way to get him in the endzone outside of literally picking him up and walking 5+ yards But, he could have grabbed him from his right side and held him up while pushing him OOB
It's not the same thing in intention, but function. You had the angle, hit the guy and wrap up at the torso (under the arms if possible), and walk him into the endzone. Keep driving (and RB was running, not standing still, so you're playing his momentum too), but instead of pulling down, you're staying upright, and keeping him up too.
In that play, contact is made at the 5 (as it would have in the Super Bowl). Keep him up and moving forward, he can't go down... possibly panic and fumble (try to toss it out of bounds?).
Posted on 2/13/23 at 3:27 pm to Scoob
I found it comical people last night were, aside from the holding, complaining about that play in particular. I mean…that was the smart and correct decision by the runner. Nothing else he should have done in that situation
Posted on 2/13/23 at 3:44 pm to UncleLester
Hahahaha I'm dying here.
A question I've not heard. Damn good sir.
A question I've not heard. Damn good sir.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 3:59 pm to Starchild
quote:
I found it comical people last night were, aside from the holding, complaining about that play in particular.
Haven't seen too many people complaining about that play (other than it taking the steam out at the end), but bitching that it wasn't a hold. Then when you point to them the tweet from the DB acknowledging that he did hold them, they change to "well, you can't call it there"
Posted on 2/13/23 at 4:05 pm to Starchild
quote:I think it was a stupid call by the Chiefs, actually.
I found it comical people last night were, aside from the holding, complaining about that play in particular.
A handoff to a running back gains you NOTHING. As we witnessed, the guy gave up an easy TD, in order to go down and run clock. At best, it only took a couple seconds more off the clock, maybe 1 more play for Philly on the back end. But you risk a fumbled exchange, or defense playing the angle to push him out of bounds. 24 in theory could have done that, had he anticipated correctly and ran with effort.
For those that will say "that will never happen", I submit this picture:
For the record- Fla State up a score, ball at the 1, 15 seconds on the play clock, 1:25 left in the game. Smart play- kneel, force LSU to burn a TO with about 1:09 left, kick the FG to go up 10, kick off with 1:06 left. Game over.
Fla State chose to run, fumbled, LSU recovered at the 1 and drove 99 yds, scoring a TD on the final play.
Yes, Fla State blocked the XP and won. Odds are LSU makes the XP and forces OT, and LSU could have went for 2 and won.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 4:28 pm to Proximo
I thought about that and after looking at the rule book, Im not sure anymore. Per the rule book:
SECTION 35 TACKLING
Tackling is an attempt by a defensive player to hold a runner to halt his advance or bring him to the ground.
I’m this scenario, you aren’t trying to halt an advance. So it can’t be considered a tackle. It goes back to forward momentum being stopped or not.
I was also looking for “Aiding or pulling the runner” rule, but it doesn’t apply to defense.
I guess it really depends on if the referee views the act of lifting the runner off the ground as “halting” and blows the play dead, because the referee believes forward moment as being stopped, even if the halt is momentary.
If the RB had been pushed in I think it’s clearly a TD. What was interesting in the replay was how close the ball was to the goal line- didn’t see that in real-time.
SECTION 35 TACKLING
Tackling is an attempt by a defensive player to hold a runner to halt his advance or bring him to the ground.
I’m this scenario, you aren’t trying to halt an advance. So it can’t be considered a tackle. It goes back to forward momentum being stopped or not.
I was also looking for “Aiding or pulling the runner” rule, but it doesn’t apply to defense.
I guess it really depends on if the referee views the act of lifting the runner off the ground as “halting” and blows the play dead, because the referee believes forward moment as being stopped, even if the halt is momentary.
If the RB had been pushed in I think it’s clearly a TD. What was interesting in the replay was how close the ball was to the goal line- didn’t see that in real-time.
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 4:33 pm
Popular
Back to top

7







