- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rule changes you'd like to see
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:21 am to BlacknGold
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:21 am to BlacknGold
RULE NAZI!!!! 
0
Posted on 3/18/11 at 8:49 am to Jason9782003
Regarding replay, the officials should defer to a replay official in the booth who determines what happened. Such plays should be limited to calls that are questionable, such as whether or not a touchdown or first down occurred, catches, etc. In the event of a play that at the time seems to have any doubt, the referee should immediately call up to the replay official and simply ask, "was the receiver in or out of bounds" or "should I award a touchdown", etc.
No challenges. No official going over his own work. Just a simple, "hey, it was close, please check"
No challenges. No official going over his own work. Just a simple, "hey, it was close, please check"
Posted on 3/18/11 at 8:50 am to BlacknGold
quote:
do people know the rules now a days?
No, they don't, as evidenced by the Internet Tough Guy thread from a couple days back with people complaining about the decision to suspend players for flagrant personal fouls.
Posted on 3/18/11 at 10:55 am to Sophandros
I'd like to see ball carriers get called for hands to the face. They stiff-arm the grill of the defender all the time and never get called. It's a double standard.
Posted on 3/18/11 at 11:44 am to DevilDogTiger
quote:
Also, you must be at least "this" hot to join the saintsations. Aside from a few hot ones the squad is comprised of dump trucks and sea donkeys.
lulz. I have started many a threads on this exact subject with proof that our squad is manly. it's a damn shame.
Posted on 3/18/11 at 11:53 am to DevilDogTiger
quote:
Also, you must be at least "this" hot to join the saintsations.
I think we need an example of how hot "this hot" is...
Posted on 3/18/11 at 11:57 am to liquid rabbit
quote:
I'd like to see ball carriers get called for hands to the face. They stiff-arm the grill of the defender all the time and never get called. It's a double standard.
The difference being they don't grab the facemask and try to yank anyone away. If they grabbed and yanked at all it'd get called, they just put their hand up and block them.
Posted on 3/18/11 at 1:00 pm to Hulkklogan
The rule change that I would most like to see is to require tacklers to at least attempt to wrap up.
Posted on 3/18/11 at 1:32 pm to Sophandros
quote:
The rule change that I would most like to see is to require tacklers to at least attempt to wrap up.
THIS
maybe then Marshawn Lynch wouldn't have scored on that last TD!
Posted on 3/18/11 at 1:35 pm to Jason9782003
I agree with all of them except #3. DBs would just exploit that to hell and literally tackle WRs when they lose position on them.
Posted on 3/18/11 at 1:56 pm to Sophandros
"This hot"
Not a fuggo among them.
This post was edited on 3/18/11 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 3/18/11 at 3:25 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
maybe then Marshawn Lynch wouldn't have scored on that last TD
Posted on 3/18/11 at 3:36 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
Did it on purpose.
Posted on 3/18/11 at 4:44 pm to Jason9782003
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 11:39 am
Posted on 3/18/11 at 5:57 pm to deuce985
quote:
I agree with all of them except #3. DBs would just exploit that to hell and literally tackle WRs when they lose position on them.
Why do people keep believing this would happen. If you're in position to tackle a WR then why not just go for the ball? You don't see this problem in college so I don't see why it would be a problem in the NFL.
Posted on 3/18/11 at 6:13 pm to DevilDogTiger
quote:
"This hot" Not a fuggo among them
Could there be a difference in the talent pool...New Orleans vs Tampa
This post was edited on 3/18/11 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 3/19/11 at 12:47 am to Jason9782003
The QB spiking the ball to stop the clock should be considered intentional grounding. He's not throwing to anyone. So what's the difference? Not a thing. Penalty.
Posted on 3/19/11 at 8:18 am to Hulkklogan
It would really cut down on concussions and other injuries.
Posted on 3/19/11 at 11:37 am to Sophandros
let coaches challenge anything --including P.I., roughing, and any other judgment calls
Posted on 3/19/11 at 11:50 am to gizmoflak
I would completely remove it from the coaches' hands and place all decisions to review with the officials. Additionally, the guy in the booth, not a ref on the field, should determine whether a call is correct.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News