- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Refs tried to screw us at the end
Posted on 9/11/22 at 5:51 pm to Got Blaze
Posted on 9/11/22 at 5:51 pm to Got Blaze
quote:
I couldn’t hear the referees call on the field because I was at a bar. I thought the penalty was called because the center snapped the ball before the referee signaled for the ball to be in play. Looking at the box score, the penalty was for intentional grounding .. ??? No telling what the refs called as I’ve never seen that call before.
They called intentional grounding, stating (essentially) that because the clock was not running, the spike was not to stop the clock, and it was therefore grounding as an in pocket throw not to an eligible receiver.
Now, because he spiked it immediately with no delay and not under pressure, I think it was a bad call, but that was their stated reasoning.
1
Posted on 9/11/22 at 6:25 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
They called intentional grounding, stating (essentially) that because the clock was not running, the spike was not to stop the clock, and it was therefore grounding as an in pocket throw not to an eligible receiver.
Now, because he spiked it immediately with no delay and not under pressure, I think it was a bad call, but that was their stated reasoning.
The intentional grounding rules don't explicitly say the spike is only protected on a running clock, but then the example fouls in the rulebook do.
LINK
quote:
0 INTENTIONAL GROUNDING—SPIKE TO CONSUME TIME
First-and-10 on B30. The game clock is stopped with six seconds left in the first half. QBA1 takes the snap and
immediately spikes the ball into the ground to take one second off the clock so that a field-goal attempt will run out
the clock.
Ruling: Half over. Intentional grounding and a 10-second runoff. A QB can only spike the ball to stop a running game
clock. An attempt to take time off the clock is intentional grounding.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 6:25 pm to LEASTBAY
quote:
And the bull shite holding call on Lattimore. Was pretty weak, especially at that point in the game.
Yea this was complete garbage. No where near where the bell was thrown. Not to mention their db’s were doing it all game long
Posted on 9/11/22 at 6:27 pm to saints5021
Id have to re-watch but i think they missed consecutive false starts by atl left tackle on last few plays of game
Posted on 9/11/22 at 6:32 pm to gerkin
quote:
have to re-watch but i think they missed consecutive false starts by atl left tackle on last few plays of game
sheet I thought I was going crazy. like he was a full half second or more before the snap
Posted on 9/11/22 at 6:43 pm to gaetti15
The refs were terrible the entire game. Gifting ATL three points before half without reviewing that obvious fumble was unacceptable.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 6:56 pm to OvertheDwayneBowe
quote:
The intentional grounding rules don't explicitly say the spike is only protected on a running clock, but then the example fouls in the rulebook do.
Interesting, though the lawyer in me would argue that it’s about intent, and because the intent was to stop the clock, not gain any other advantage, it should not have been called. If they want it to be limited to a running clock, period, they should write it into the rule, in my opinion.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 6:57 pm to gaetti15
quote:
sheet I thought I was going crazy. like he was a full half second or more before the snap
I was literally saying “he jumped again” out loud by the end
Posted on 9/11/22 at 6:58 pm to saints5021
Essentially it all evened out. Landry would have been spotted further back & the clock would have kept running.
Instead he was spotted further up & the clock was stopped, then a 10 yd penalty was tacked on.
This actually may have worked out better for the saints.
Instead he was spotted further up & the clock was stopped, then a 10 yd penalty was tacked on.
This actually may have worked out better for the saints.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:02 pm to saints5021
quote:
Landry was down in bounds
If Landry was down in bounds and they erroneously ruled him out, wouldn’t that be a favorable call for the Saints?
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:45 pm to porter8
[quote]Essentially it all evened out. Landry would have been spotted further back & the clock would have kept running[/quot
I have no idea what you are talking about here. They spotted Landry down at the 40 and didn’t give him the extra yardage he got when he got up and ran with the ball. They just blew it and said he was out of bounds when he was nowhere near the side line when he landed.
I have no idea what you are talking about here. They spotted Landry down at the 40 and didn’t give him the extra yardage he got when he got up and ran with the ball. They just blew it and said he was out of bounds when he was nowhere near the side line when he landed.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:37 pm to beauchristopher
Can’t understand why that was not reviewed! All you can say is that was a home field call or no call. It was a turn over and booth let it slide. I thought all turn overs are reviewed?
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:54 pm to Bedtiger
The announcers said something about it being reviewed. Not sure if it actually was or wasnt.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:56 pm to gerkin
YES!!!! I was screaming this….
Posted on 9/12/22 at 10:19 am to gerkin
quote:
Id have to re-watch but i think they missed consecutive false starts by atl left tackle on last few plays of game
You don't
I yelled that twice from my couch as well
Posted on 9/12/22 at 10:23 am to saints5021
They gave us a huge break when they gave MT the first down on the play after the botched screen to Kamara. He was at least half a yard short.
Posted on 9/12/22 at 10:32 am to saints5021
The last personal foul called on Lattimore that gave falcons a chance to win the game.
Replay shows WR hit Lattimore twice before he retaliated.
And the WR also flopped.
Replay shows WR hit Lattimore twice before he retaliated.
And the WR also flopped.
This post was edited on 9/12/22 at 10:34 am
Posted on 9/12/22 at 10:40 am to saints5021
I thought the penalty for intentional grounding is where you threw the ball from.
Posted on 9/12/22 at 10:45 am to Stirling
Didn't they say the grounding was because nobody was set--which made no sense either?
I was legit shocked that they didn't try to do a 10 second runoff or something.
I was legit shocked that they didn't try to do a 10 second runoff or something.
Posted on 9/12/22 at 10:46 am to saints5021
I think the falcons had 4 timeouts in the first half.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News