Started By
Message

re: NO 34 @ TEN 26 | Final | CBS - SAINTS WIN! Next: NO (6-10) @ ATL (7-9) Sunday @ Noon

Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
113314 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:32 pm to
Right down the middle again
Posted by Orndorf2
Member since Jun 2020
136 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:32 pm to
He threw that ball behind him. Should have been a fumble
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
15974 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:32 pm to
How in the world is that not grounding
Posted by Neilfish
Member since Jun 2006
3696 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:32 pm to
Why would the WH call that incomplete. He can’t rule on that. It was a backward pass
Posted by dukeg7213
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2023
7076 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:32 pm to
This is the #1 pick?
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
147132 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

That's a backwards pass

He threw it off a lineman's head... that's an illegal touching penalty
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
13632 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:33 pm to
Wasn’t backwards, but seems like that’s grounding. Was that a TE?
Posted by MetArl15
Washington, DC
Member since Apr 2007
13556 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:33 pm to
It’s either a backwards pass or a penalty for ineligible receiver right? It hit #70 in the head.

If neither of the two, it’s intentional grounding. It didn’t go beyond the line of scrimmage and there was no eligible receiver in the area.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62262 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Was that a TE?


#70
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
11575 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

He threw it off a lineman's head... that's an illegal touching penalty


If it wasn't backwards it was illegal touching or grounding.

I mean wtf??
Posted by FireGoodell
Member since Mar 2019
8671 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:34 pm to
These refs have no interest in this game. They just ready to leave
Posted by DamageInc
Member since Jan 2025
1109 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:34 pm to
Refs and saints coaches just ignoring a backwards pass that didn’t make it anywhere near the line of scrimmage. Even if we don’t recover it keeps them from kicking a FG.

Announcers were also clueless.
Posted by RaginSaint43
Member since Dec 2016
2782 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:34 pm to
Refs are checked out. Reffing like it’s preseason
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
30446 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:34 pm to
Either ineligible receiver or intentional grounding. How the hell that wasnt a penalty is crazy
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23159 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:35 pm to
Also why is the ref blowing it dead. Aren’t they trained to let the play continue so as to allow a review.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
33699 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

He threw it off a lineman's head... that's an illegal touching penalty
only if intentional touching. That obviously wasn't intentional. The bigger problem is that it was extremely close to being a backwards pass. If a review determines it was, the Titans get the ball where their OL recovered it and are maybe out of field goal range.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 12:36 pm
Posted by Sunnyvale
Little ST. James
Member since Feb 2024
3340 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:35 pm to
Its a Fumble and Penalty if the saints did it. Automatic loss of posession. 15 yards and Titans get the ball at their 20
Posted by RaginSaint43
Member since Dec 2016
2782 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

only if intentional touching. That obviously wasn't intentional. The bigger problem is that it was extremely close to being a backwards pass. If a review determines it was, the Titans get the ball where their OL recovered it and are maybe out of field goal range.


They shouldn’t have blown the whistle unless it was obvious. It wasn’t obvious to the players at all
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
33699 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

They shouldn’t have blown the whistle unless it was obvious. It wasn’t obvious to the players at all
doesn't matter. There was an obvious recovery by the Titans. They could still review it and determine it was a backwards pass.
Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
113314 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:37 pm to
Hill ran right into back of his own man
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 44
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 44Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram