- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If the saints and bears both have 4 losses
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:26 pm
Who gets the first round bye?
10
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:27 pm to GeauxZone90
First downvote
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:27 pm to GeauxZone90
Bears...via better conference record
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:29 pm to tickfawtiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:40 pm to GeauxZone90
I don’t see 4 losses on the Saints schedule
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:10 pm to MizzouTrue
It’ll be the Bears.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:20 pm to MizzouTrue
Than why did everyone want the Rams to lose. A gurantee first round bye is more important
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:24 pm to GeauxZone90
Get outta here with that shite
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:40 pm to GeauxZone90
quote:
Than why did everyone want the Rams to lose. A gurantee first round bye is more important
What the frick
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:43 pm to Isaid
The bears beating the rams isn’t a bad thing. One seed is great.
The vigor with which it was rooted for was a bit short sighted though I agree. Very few people even considered the pros of having the rams win.
We lose Monday night and the bears beat GB and people will be rethinking that one track thinking. But we can cross that bridge when we come to it. For now it’s fine
The vigor with which it was rooted for was a bit short sighted though I agree. Very few people even considered the pros of having the rams win.
We lose Monday night and the bears beat GB and people will be rethinking that one track thinking. But we can cross that bridge when we come to it. For now it’s fine
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:46 pm to GeauxZone90
Rooting for a better shot at having the 2 seed rather than enjoying being in the drivers seat for the 1 seed? What a cuck...
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:50 pm to Who_Dat_Tiger
It’s pretty logical. The bye is much more important than the 1 seed, especially bc the 1 would be in LA. And the team were holding off is Chicago.
A bye, winning at home, winning at LA.
A bye, winning at home, winning at home.
Winning at home, winning at Chicago, winning at LA.
The degree of difficulty is exponentially higher behind door number 3.
A bye, winning at home, winning at LA.
A bye, winning at home, winning at home.
Winning at home, winning at Chicago, winning at LA.
The degree of difficulty is exponentially higher behind door number 3.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:51 pm to Who_Dat_Tiger
If you guranteed a first round bye and you know the Rams aren't going lose their remaining weak opponents you can rest your starters. Losing a key player will hurt you more than playing in LA
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:56 pm to GeauxZone90
I wouldn’t stoop to expecting us to lose 2 of our last 3 games which would need to happen + Bears winning out in order for us to lose out on a bye. The bears have as tough of a remaining schedule as us, think you are just being a cuck. Be glad we almost assuredly have a bye, plus are in the drivers seat for 1 seed. Playoffstatus.com has odds at 96% we get one of the top 2 seeds
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:01 pm to GeauxZone90
What a chicken little bitch boy mentality
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:04 pm to Melvin
I will bump this thread if we don't get the bye or lose a key player frick boy
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:06 pm to Melvin
To completely write off the benefits of securing the two seed is to show an insane amount of hubris and a complete disregard of risk/reward analysis.
It’s fine that the bears won. But it would’ve been equally as fine had the rams won.
It’s fine that the bears won. But it would’ve been equally as fine had the rams won.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:07 pm to GeauxZone90
So if any significant player gets injured for the rest of the regular season that somehow justifies not wanting to have the number 1 seed? You think SP would have rested all starters for 2 games going into the playoffs?
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:08 pm to GeauxZone90
quote:
Than why did everyone want the Rams to lose. A gurantee first round bye is more important
This is pathetic. Also, if we can't win 2 of these final 3, then we weren't winning shite in the playoffs anyways.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:09 pm to Melvin
He would start pulling starters after the first half trust me. If MT or AK got hurt our chances of winning it all drops big time
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 9:10 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News