Started By
Message

From MMQB...regarding Unger and M. Thomas...

Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:16 pm
Posted by cgbfairhope
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since Jun 2007
226 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:16 pm
Saints center Max Unger. Unger played a key part in the Saints’ impressive offensive performance on Sunday. As a pass protector, Unger didn’t allow a single pressure of Drew Brees on 44 pass-blocking snaps. In the run game, Unger and his linemates cleared the way for the Saints’ backs to run for a combined 154 yards before being contacted by a 49ers defender.

Drew Brees, quarterback, and Michael Thomas, wide receiver, New Orleans. Amazing how quickly Brees and the second-round rookie from Ohio State have formed the sort of quarterback-receiver bond that it typically takes years to build. Why is it the right combination? Because Brees had a very similar receiver, Marques Colston, age out of the lineup at 32; the Saints let him go last spring. And in came Thomas two months later in the draft. How similar are Thomas and Colston? Both around 6'3½", both around 225 pounds, and both run about a 4.5-second (non-blazing) 40-yard dash. To see why Brees has fallen in like with Thomas, look at his second touchdown catch Sunday, a wrestling match for the ball in the end zone that Thomas won with athletic physicality. For the game, Thomas caught the fourth and fifth touchdown catches of his eight-game career, and he now leads the explosive Saints with 47 catches … on pace for a 94-catch season as a rookie.
Posted by Sparkplug#1
Member since May 2013
7352 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:36 pm to
Thomas seems more physical than Colston. I love Colston and that's not me saying Thomas is bettter, just more physical
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64385 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:52 pm to
A lot of folks around here don't remember young Colston just old Colston

Thomas has a chance I think to be better but thats a long way off and won't be a easy goal to reach. Just wanted to add and say the one difference I've noticed is Thomas's body control seems better and he seems more flexible than Colston.
This post was edited on 11/7/16 at 12:54 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278500 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Thomas seems more physical than Colston.



no way

Colston was great at running through tackles. Thomas runs around them
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:55 pm to
I do think Thomas has that high level of confidence needed to be elite, though. He is so damn impressive.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33745 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:25 pm to
Thomas is a bad arse but don't forget the amount of hits Colston took. He was as tough as they came.

Rebounded quickly from a broken collar bone in 2011.. Got hurt against Green Bay and came back like 2-3 weeks later
Posted by Laaz2750
Los Angeles
Member since Aug 2008
8382 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:31 pm to
Yeah Thomas' mind is definitely right. I mean it takes serious balls, as a rookie, to have a twitter handle like "can'tguardMike"
Posted by JackVincennes
NOLA
Member since Jan 2014
3904 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:33 pm to
For a VERY long time no one in the league caught the high ball over the middle contorting his body and exposing himself like Colston. Part of the execution was Drew throwing the ball high and trailing Colston to where only he could catch it, of course that meant he was ripe for the picking as the safety delivered the hit. And that was when you were actually expected to light up a receiver over the middle.
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:41 pm to
The Brees-to-Colston back shoulder throw was a thing of beauty.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278500 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

I do think Thomas has that high level of confidence needed to be elite, though. He is so damn impressive.



oh yea he is awesome. our best WR imo
This post was edited on 11/7/16 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166326 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:45 pm to
Thomas' footwork is elite for a ROOKIE, kid going to be a stable stud for a long time
Posted by Sparkplug#1
Member since May 2013
7352 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Thomas is a bad arse but don't forget the amount of hits Colston took. He was as tough as they came. Rebounded quickly from a broken collar bone in 2011.. Got hurt against Green Bay and came back like 2-3 weeks later


I know Colston was a beast. He stayed in the game for a play, knowing he broke his collar bone.
Posted by jennyjones
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Apr 2006
9315 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

no way

Colston was great at running through tackles. Thomas runs around them


Yep. They may have both been timed in the 4.5 range, but Thomas seems a step or 2 faster than prime Colston. Definitely quicker
Posted by Split2874
Mandeville
Member since Jul 2012
2454 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 2:51 pm to
I think the biggest difference between Colston and Thomas is where they came from in college

Thomas is more NFL ready but hopefully he can be the at least the next Big Smmmmmooooooothhhh
Posted by breauxmosexual
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2016
2526 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 3:23 pm to
Everybody in here doing everything they can to avoid blaspheming.,..I'll say it. Thomas > colston overall as a receiver. Has a little bit of everything. Colston was great at what he did though.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 3:25 pm to
Colston was a tough fricker
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166326 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 3:43 pm to
i see a lot of similarities to Cris Carter, not sure why. Similar builds, neither are blazers, both physical to ball and incredible hands.



Posted by BILLFISHER22
Houma
Member since Oct 2009
1445 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 4:20 pm to
CC is a great comparison
Posted by Big D of the LC
Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2008
1031 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 11:29 am to
Thomas has better ball skills, quickness, and speed compared to Colston as a rook.
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Everybody in here doing everything they can to avoid blaspheming.,..I'll say it. Thomas > colston overall as a receiver. Has a little bit of everything. Colston was great at what he did thoug
Or we could wait at least one season to claim a rookie is better than the greatest receiver in team history.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram