Started By
Message

re: Draft a QB this year

Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48320 posts
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

There is not a single QB in the draft that I would say has "good upside".


Malik Willis is nothing but upside. Im personally not buying the hype, but his draft status is largely built on things he really has yet to accomplish on a football field.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74482 posts
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

The deal they gave him is probably a prove it type of deal. Giving him a chance to earn a long term contract.



Right. Jameis is only 28. If he proves to be a thing he is your QB the next 10 years. He’s essentially your draft pick QB without the years, money and learning curve.

If he’s bad you’re in position to draft a QB with a higher pick the next two years
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41720 posts
Posted on 3/21/22 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Malik Willis is nothing but upside. Im personally not buying the hype, but his draft status is largely built on things he really has yet to accomplish on a football field.


That's not upside. That's wishcasting.
Posted by PuddinheadSr
Member since May 2016
283 posts
Posted on 3/21/22 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

I am all for drafting a QB in round 1 or 2. 


"A" quarterback, you say?

quote:

Worst case is you have a young, cheap QB with potential ready to start in year 3. 


No, worst case scenario is you convinced yourself to waste a first or second round pick on a JAG who will clearly never be a starter because you've convinced yourself you "need" to take a QB there, even if (even moreso than most years) about half the first round QBs turn out to never be consistent starters. Plus you pass on the WR, TE, or whatever position the BAP ends up being.
Posted by landrywasbeast30
Member since Nov 2011
4904 posts
Posted on 3/21/22 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

Personally I hope they are still working the phones with Cleveland.


To do what? They aren’t trading for Baker after signing Jameis.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
77204 posts
Posted on 3/21/22 at 6:18 pm to
You left out who is your sure fire franchise QB to get in rnd 1.

I don't see one.
Posted by landrywasbeast30
Member since Nov 2011
4904 posts
Posted on 3/21/22 at 6:26 pm to
Ima keep beating the Sam Howell drum. He is an example of how dumb scouting qb’s is. After last year, he came into this season as a projected number 1 pick type of talent.

Because his weapons moved on to NFL, and the team wasn’t as good, now he can probably be had end of first, beginning of second round. It’s not like he was terrible.

He’s still had nice numbers. The guy ran for 800 yards, and has a big arm. As someone else said, until you find your franchise qb, you should always be looking for that guy.
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25826 posts
Posted on 3/21/22 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

This draft's crop of quarterbacks are not too good.


We aren’t picking in the Top 15 - it gives us a legit chance to snag QB1 or QB2 this year.

If we were picking Top 5 I’d feel terrible about drafting a Qb this year, but we aren’t.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34933 posts
Posted on 3/22/22 at 12:34 am to
Completely agree, but usually there’s an obvious standout or two
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
17214 posts
Posted on 3/22/22 at 10:52 am to
I like Winston but he’s not the QB of the future and the contract he just signed is proof of that. Best case scenario is we sign another QB and draft one and the best payers wins the job. If it’s Winston then good for us but it won’t be Winston, Hill and Book going into the season.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram