- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Contrast the ruling in Olave’s nonTD and the Pats one ruled a catch vs Latimore
Posted on 10/8/23 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 10/8/23 at 2:45 pm
I may not be remembering it right, been working and half watching, but wasn’t the Patriots one ruled a catch because Latimore dislodge the ball after his backside was on the ground?
Posted on 10/8/23 at 2:47 pm to Meauxjeaux
And Olave had a few steps, where the Patriots catch did not have that element
Posted on 10/8/23 at 2:48 pm to Meauxjeaux
Think the difference was down by contact
Posted on 10/8/23 at 2:48 pm to Meauxjeaux
You know why its different.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 2:49 pm to Meauxjeaux
Both calls were correct amazingly
Posted on 10/8/23 at 2:55 pm to msstate7
quote:
Think the difference was down by contact
Kinda makes sense but also kinda seems like possession all the way through would mean if it gets knocked out that’s not possession all the way through.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 3:05 pm to Meauxjeaux
Also, why is it automatically a td if it touches the red pylon then and doesn’t matter what happens after? Cross the goal line; it’s a score is what they always preach
Posted on 10/8/23 at 4:04 pm to Meauxjeaux
If Olave didn’t drop the damn ball every time he hit the ground it wouldn’t matter
Dude basically rinsed 100 yards worth of offense today due to drops and not getting his feet down.
Dude basically rinsed 100 yards worth of offense today due to drops and not getting his feet down.
This post was edited on 10/8/23 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 10/8/23 at 4:05 pm to 3PieceSpicy
quote:
If Olave didn’t drop the damn ball every time he hit the ground it wouldn’t matter
He’s weak as hell
Posted on 10/8/23 at 4:17 pm to MONROE
Bottom 97th percentile frame in NFL combine history
Dude’s got to get in the weight room if he wants to be great instead of good.
Dude’s got to get in the weight room if he wants to be great instead of good.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 4:41 pm to Meauxjeaux
I thought Olave caught the ball just outside of the endzone and crossed the line. Should’ve been a TD no matter what happened on the ground.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 5:05 pm to LSUFreek
That’s why I was confused also
Posted on 10/8/23 at 10:17 pm to Meauxjeaux
I think the biggest clear difference is the catch by the Patriot receiver was ruled a catch on the field and it stood. Olave's play was ruled no catch on the field. I personally thought both were not catches, but I can say with certainty that I have no clear idea of what a catch is in the NFL through years of inconsistent officiating.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 10:23 pm to Proximo
quote:
Also, why is it automatically a td if it touches the red pylon then and doesn’t matter what happens after? Cross the goal line; it’s a score is what they always preach
That's if the player crossing the pylon has possession. Once you break the plane of the goal line WITH POSSESSION the play is over at that point. They said Olave never fully gained possession (rightly or wrongly) because he didn't hold the ball through going to the ground.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 12:13 am to LSUgrad88
Olave had possession and made a football move with his two steps before he fell to the ground. He didn't fall to the ground in the process of making the catch which is typically when the catch is overturned.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 7:38 am to Meauxjeaux
It really is amazing that the NFL has made the definition of a catch so convoluted that nobody knows what a catch actually is anymore.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 8:02 am to Geaux14999
quote:
It really is amazing that the NFL has made the definition of a catch so convoluted that nobody knows what a catch actually is anymore.
And it is interpreted differently each game.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 8:30 am to Froman
Which is the biggest problem with the entirety of the NFL officials. It's like they all read different rule books from week to week.
That on top of them all feeling like they need to be the center of attention and insert themselves into every single play. The amount of flags this year in every game seem higher than ever. Through week 5, minus tonite of course, there have been 963 penalties total. There were 3,154 in all of 2022.
That on top of them all feeling like they need to be the center of attention and insert themselves into every single play. The amount of flags this year in every game seem higher than ever. Through week 5, minus tonite of course, there have been 963 penalties total. There were 3,154 in all of 2022.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 1:27 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
I may not be remembering it right, been working and half watching, but wasn’t the Patriots one ruled a catch because Latimore dislodge the ball after his backside was on the ground?
Olave’s wasn’t a catch. He only took 2 steps and lost it when he hit the ground.
The ruling on the Patriot one was that the ball was secured with the player down and then the ball was jarred loose.
I don’t agree with that. The guy was out cold and the ball was just laying on him…not secure. But it’s a reasonable argument and different than the Olave catch.
Posted on 10/9/23 at 1:30 pm to Proximo
quote:
Also, why is it automatically a td if it touches the red pylon then and doesn’t matter what happens after? Cross the goal line; it’s a score is what they always preach
I don’t think that’s true.
A player still has to complete the catch.
Popular
Back to top


10







