- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chris Simms: Shough will be the starter
Posted on 8/18/25 at 1:23 pm to dj30
Posted on 8/18/25 at 1:23 pm to dj30
It would be foolish to not see what you have with Rattler under the new offense, with a healthy cast. Odds are he isn’t it, but we must do the due diligence to ensure he isn’t a guy. Shough will have ample opps if Rattler does indeed suck
Posted on 8/18/25 at 2:03 pm to LSUZombie
If nothing else you need to find out what he's really made of before you enter a QB-rich 2026 draft with a top 5 pick.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 2:23 pm to Vacherie Saint
I think the experiment is ready to go.
We have a qb on 3rd year 2nd year and first year and 18 more games. Seems like CKM will have plenty of results to ponder next off season to me.
We have a qb on 3rd year 2nd year and first year and 18 more games. Seems like CKM will have plenty of results to ponder next off season to me.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 3:06 pm to bstaceyau19
quote:
Shough will be the starter
I'd bet money this doesn't happen. Shough isn't ready compared to Rattler. The INT Rattler threw was on Tipton. He played as good as possible yesterday. Don't get me wrong, he'll still throw INTS because he's a gun slinger, but he's used to playing behind a shite oline and making things happen.
Don't bring up last year. That's in the past and he was thrown in the fire with nothing. No coaching, no line, no WRs, no Kamara etc. He had zero chance of success last year.
I'm still hoping Shough pays off because he looks great at times. We have time and the coaching to let him sit.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 4:55 pm to Alt26
quote:
Most who cover the Saints more intently think the opposite
These folks are often wrong.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 4:57 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
It would be foolish to not see what you have with Rattler under the new offense, with a healthy cast. Odds are he isn’t it, but we must do the due diligence to ensure he isn’t a guy. Shough will have ample opps if Rattler does indeed suck
This comment - contradicting its own self.
Foolish not to start Rattler/odds are he isnt the guy.
Classic.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 5:35 pm to bstaceyau19
Like I said last night. Live or die by the sword. Drafted for a reason. What you think cocky time? S Carolina qbs in the NFL never pan out. Garcia, spent too much time at the bar, and Todd Ellis was a deer in the headlights back in the day vs LSU in the Gator Bowl.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 7:04 pm to LSUZombie
quote:
You took him in the 2nd and guaranteed him $10M. Shough absolutely needs to start and play as much as possible this year so you know with certainty if you'll need to take a QB in round 1.
That’s under $3 million/year. In comparison, they paid Jameis Winston over $10 million/year to ride the bench.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:22 am to bstaceyau19
Maybe. Maybe Chris Simms can go frick himself.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 11:23 am to RawDog7984
quote:
I truly don’t get the “let’s start Rattler for the first few games then let Shough play”. If it’s this close of a competition you give Shough the shot to show this team he’s the guy. We’re gonna be really bad this year and qb is in play next year.
I'm not advocating for the Saints to start Rattler for the first few games. I'm just saying I think that's what they will do. We view things from a fan's POV. That is we want to see who the best guy may be without much regard for the results. For Moore, he owes an obligation to his players to try to win games. If there is little separation between the two QBs, then most coaches will lean on experience. Rattler has NFL starting experience. Shough doesn't. If after the first few games Rattler isn't good and the Saints aren't winning, then there would be no harm in making a change.
quote:
I know what we have in Rattler and that is a mediocre backup qb with one hell of an arm.
That may ultimately be the case. But the variables that existed at the time you made that decision aren't the same as they are now. Namely, that was last season under a completely difference coaching staff, and in many of his starts the OL was injured and the availability of his top pass catchers was spotty.
There is really no "good" option. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having this conversation. But I can understand why a new HC might lean towards experience to start the season.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 12:14 pm to P bean
quote:
This comment - contradicting its own self.
Foolish not to start Rattler/odds are he isnt the guy.
Classic.
I can see how it’s a hard concept for you to grasp
Odds are shough isn’t a guy either. We just won’t play a QB bc they all probably suck
Posted on 8/19/25 at 12:24 pm to bstaceyau19
In a perfect world you could let Rattler start the first 4 to 6 games and then bring Shough in when the team is more settled and the schedule is easier, and perhaps the pressure is off because we're 1-5. That's why most teams have journeyman vet like Jacoby Brisset around in these situations, someone who expects to be benched eventually for the draft pick. The Saints have made it weird by basically having two rookies, both of whom have at least some potential.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 2:38 pm to bstaceyau19
Neither Shough or Rattler is playing light out above the other. Why name a starter beyond the one that will start the first game.
Moore is going a bit non-conforming so far so why not just say the QB play will be fluid for a few weeks into the season. Give one QB the initial nod but let it be known that if the offense seems to be struggling, he will not be frozen from trying the other QB. Name a QB weekly if needed until there iss clear separation as to who drives the offense best.
My logic says this removes the pressure on the QB and also the negative impact on the player psychology if he does get pulled during a game.
Moore is going a bit non-conforming so far so why not just say the QB play will be fluid for a few weeks into the season. Give one QB the initial nod but let it be known that if the offense seems to be struggling, he will not be frozen from trying the other QB. Name a QB weekly if needed until there iss clear separation as to who drives the offense best.
My logic says this removes the pressure on the QB and also the negative impact on the player psychology if he does get pulled during a game.
Popular
Back to top

1







