- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Carr is currently the #4 qb in rating in the league.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:54 pm to GynoSandberg
Posted on 11/19/24 at 12:54 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
But if your $150 mil QB isn’t the solution, he is the problem. We have no money for depth on the OL and at WR, league worst TE room. Having shite drafts recently hasn’t helped. What do we expect to happen?
Bingo. Carr just isn’t good enough to lift the lack of talent around him and thats ok but if you can’t upgrade that talent because you have to pay your mediocre QB- then what is the point of having Carr on your team?
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:11 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
But if your $150 mil QB isn’t the solution, he is the problem. We have no money for depth on the OL and at WR, league worst TE room. Having shite drafts recently hasn’t helped. What do we expect to happen?
We are paying for a Ferrari but equipping it with parts from Pep Boys
This analogy is basing his contract value as a comparison to what QBs were getting paid when Drew was still in the league. These contracts have gotten crazy the past few years.
To put in perspective, Carr's average cap hit is $37.5M and has him as the 18th highest paid QB in the league. When Drew last played in 2020 (4 F*ing years ago) the highest cap hit for a QB was Dak at $31.4M
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:17 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
This analogy is basing his contract value as a comparison to what QBs were getting paid when Drew was still in the league. These contracts have gotten crazy the past few years.
To put in perspective, Carr's average cap hit is $37.5M and has him as the 18th highest paid QB in the league.
This. He’s paid less than most starting QBs in the league and just over some rookies.
quote:
Player TotalValue Avg./Year
Dak Prescott $240,000,000 $60,000,000
Joe Burrow $275,000,000 $55,000,000
Jordan Love $220,000,000 $55,000,000
Trevor Lawrence $275,000,000 $55,000,000
Tua Tagovailoa $212,400,000 $53,100,000
Jared Goff $212,000,000 $53,000,000
Justin Herbert $262,500,000 $52,500,000
Lamar Jackson $260,000,000 $52,000,000
Jalen Hurts $255,000,000 $51,000,000
Kyler Murray $230,500,000 $46,100,000
Deshaun Watson $230,000,000 $46,000,000
Kirk Cousins $180,000,000 $45,000,000
Patrick Mahomes $450,000,000 $45,000,000
Josh Allen $258,000,000 $43,000,000
Matt Stafford $160,000,000 $40,000,000
Daniel Jones $160,000,000 $40,000,000
Aaron Rodgers $112,500,000 $37,500,000
Derek Carr $150,000,000 $37,500,000
Baker Mayfield $100,000,000 $33,333,333
Geno Smith $75,000,000 $25,000,000
Gardner Minshew $25,000,000 $12,500,000
Sam Darnold $10,000,000 $10,000,000
Caleb Williams $39,486,058 $9,871,515
Bryce Young $37,955,074 $9,488,769
Jayden Daniels $37,746,650 $9,436,663
Drake Maye $36,639,764 $9,159,941
C.J. Stroud $36,279,246 $9,069,812
Zach Wilson $35,150,680 $8,787,695
Trey Lance $34,105,258 $8,526,315
Over The Cap
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:19 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
To put in perspective, Carr's average cap hit is $37.5M and has him as the 18th highest paid QB in the league. When Drew last played in 2020 (4 F*ing years ago) the highest cap hit for a QB was Dak at $31.4M
Agreed but with the cap issues this team has and the ceiling Carr has as a QB. Does it make a sense for a team like the Saints to pay Carr that money? Not saying Carr is being overpaid. Its just when you have a lack of talent across the board, salary cap issues- why pay Carr when he isn’t helping your cap or helping your team win at a higher level?
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:31 pm to Pels_Yaz
I completely understand what you are saying, but when you look at the list Suntiger posted you see that there are only 4 veteran QBs with an average less than Carr's. Loomis & DA gambled on Carr so they could avoid rotating vet QBs. Even if you do not like the QB they tried it with, I can respect the fact that they tried to do something.
DA was properly awarded based on the results of that gamble. The question is does Gayle give Loomis the same treatment at the end of the year, or does he get saved to make at least 1 more bold move because he got it right with Payton & Brees.
DA was properly awarded based on the results of that gamble. The question is does Gayle give Loomis the same treatment at the end of the year, or does he get saved to make at least 1 more bold move because he got it right with Payton & Brees.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:41 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
The question is does Gayle give Loomis the same treatment at the end of the year, or does he get saved to make at least 1 more bold move because he got it right with Payton & Brees.
I’m not sure what Gayle will do but I’ll say this. The fact she undercut Loomis to fire DA and Loomis still showing support for DA- speaks dividends. I think Loomis basically gets moved from the position but not the franchise. He might even have a say in the new GM but the fact Loomis clearly made it a point he didn’t feel DA should have got fired- seemed like a man who’s already been told his fate and is just holding the ship steady till someone else comes to captain it.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 2:44 pm to Weekend Warrior79
You need context when examining QB contracts. It’s more nuanced than he makes X compared to the rest of the QB
He will take up the most cap on the Saints in 2025 at 19% the cap. Next closest guy on the roster is at 11%. He jumps to 21% in ‘26, with the next closest at 9%. Derek Carr. Who gives a frick with his cap hit is compared to other QBs? We are talking about what’s best for this team. There’s QBs who deserve the money, teams with less dead money, teams with better cap situations etc. We are none of those.
We had (at the time of signing) and now have going forward, minimal wiggle room to add impact players. But we chose a QB who needs good WRs - you’re two best guys are 6’ 185 lbs finesse WRs (small -now hurt, no depth). Now we have guys off the street there. Two of your TEs are converted from another position. He needs a sturdy OL with depth to fill in bc he pisses his pants under duress.. So by paying him (he was the 10th highest paid QB at the time of original signing I believe) you basically relegate your ability to add impact talent to the draft.
Would it make more sense to find a cheaper bridge QB, which would allow you a little more spending in FA? Or would you rather be up against with Carr with no resources to spend on other talent around him. Both options aren’t winning you a ring, but one allows you flexibility when it comes to rebuilding a roster and possibly finding the QB of the future.
He will take up the most cap on the Saints in 2025 at 19% the cap. Next closest guy on the roster is at 11%. He jumps to 21% in ‘26, with the next closest at 9%. Derek Carr. Who gives a frick with his cap hit is compared to other QBs? We are talking about what’s best for this team. There’s QBs who deserve the money, teams with less dead money, teams with better cap situations etc. We are none of those.
We had (at the time of signing) and now have going forward, minimal wiggle room to add impact players. But we chose a QB who needs good WRs - you’re two best guys are 6’ 185 lbs finesse WRs (small -now hurt, no depth). Now we have guys off the street there. Two of your TEs are converted from another position. He needs a sturdy OL with depth to fill in bc he pisses his pants under duress.. So by paying him (he was the 10th highest paid QB at the time of original signing I believe) you basically relegate your ability to add impact talent to the draft.
Would it make more sense to find a cheaper bridge QB, which would allow you a little more spending in FA? Or would you rather be up against with Carr with no resources to spend on other talent around him. Both options aren’t winning you a ring, but one allows you flexibility when it comes to rebuilding a roster and possibly finding the QB of the future.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 2:48 pm to GynoSandberg
Delete
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 6:03 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
In 142 games with the Raiders, Derek Carr had only 10 games with pass rate of 125.0 or higher. (8-2) In 25 games with the Saints, Derek Carr had 7 games with pass rate of 125.0 or higher. (7-0)
What a moronic cherry picked stat that proves what?
By the way idiot, that would be 17 games with a passer rating which would put Carr at just outside the top 25 in NFL history.
fricking stupid arse tard. Romo/Stafford had/have 23 each and Matt ryan/roethlisberger had 29.
Montana had 22.
LINK
quote:
possibly finding the QB of the future.
Where? Next years draft? Not at all likely.
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 8:27 pm to GynoSandberg
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 8:56 pm to Paytonisablowhard
He threw a pick on what couldve been the game winning drive
Imagine wearing the “game winning drive” badge with honor when your defense shuts out the Eagles for three quarters and all you can muster is 3 points
I’ve never seen people make so many excuses for a QB

Imagine wearing the “game winning drive” badge with honor when your defense shuts out the Eagles for three quarters and all you can muster is 3 points
I’ve never seen people make so many excuses for a QB
Posted on 11/19/24 at 9:54 pm to GynoSandberg
I feel like most take up for him bc the criticism is over the top.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 10:34 pm to Townedrunkard
I admit I had never paid much attention to him before he came to the Saints so he may be alright.
Is it wrong if I just don’t like his fricking Eddie Munster looking face. He talks too dam much also. All talk and meh action.
Is it wrong if I just don’t like his fricking Eddie Munster looking face. He talks too dam much also. All talk and meh action.
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 10:37 pm to msstate7
It is. Think of where we were, we thought we were contenders or middle of the road needing a Qb to contend. It's no different than what Atlanta did this year with cousins.
Think the more oll conceived ideas were the drafting, free agents, and coaching that made the decision look worse. Let's say we took branch and achane last year. Kept baun and played him more rather than trying to do whatever bullshite defensively DA was forcing-would we look better than 4-7? Likely yes
Think the more oll conceived ideas were the drafting, free agents, and coaching that made the decision look worse. Let's say we took branch and achane last year. Kept baun and played him more rather than trying to do whatever bullshite defensively DA was forcing-would we look better than 4-7? Likely yes
Posted on 11/20/24 at 7:57 am to htran90
People who make every excuse for Carr are no better than the ones who say he’s the worst in the league
Win/Loss says who you are, at the end of the day. The onus is on Carr to prove he can win. He’s 11 years in and has the 6th most starts amongst active QBs
Win/Loss says who you are, at the end of the day. The onus is on Carr to prove he can win. He’s 11 years in and has the 6th most starts amongst active QBs
Posted on 11/20/24 at 8:39 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
He will take up the most cap on the Saints in 2025 at 19% the cap. Next closest guy on the roster is at 11%. He jumps to 21% in ‘26, with the next closest at 9%. Derek Carr. Who gives a frick with his cap hit is compared to other QBs? We are talking about what’s best for this team. There’s QBs who deserve the money, teams with less dead money, teams with better cap situations etc. We are none of those.
Imagine blaming Carr because the Saints have over $40 mil tied up in players that are no longer on the roster.
That’s why the percentages are the way they are, not because Carr is the 18th highest paid QB in the league.
ETA: And that’s not even including Ram or Lattimore now.
This post was edited on 11/20/24 at 9:05 am
Posted on 11/20/24 at 8:53 am to GynoSandberg
Serious question - from 2014 to 2016 was Brees a good qb? I say he was despite going 21-26. I don't think he was better in 2017 to 2020 while he went 41-13; I just think his supporting cast got much better.
And no, I'm not saying Carr is Brees, but if supporting cast matters for a player the magnitude of brees, why not Carr?
And no, I'm not saying Carr is Brees, but if supporting cast matters for a player the magnitude of brees, why not Carr?
Posted on 11/20/24 at 10:10 am to msstate7
quote:
Serious question - from 2014 to 2016 was Brees a good qb? I say he was despite going 21-26.
Look I get the point you’re trying to make but this is not remotely the same. During this span, Brees was leading one of the top 5 offenses in the league. The offense was thriving because of him. The defense was one of the worst in the league. Unfortunately, Brees does not play defense.
Our defense hasnt been great since Carr has been here but they been in most games good enough to win. At no point was the offense one of the league’s best with Carr- there have been a lot of offensive issues some because of Carr and others not his fault. But Carr didn’t rise his offense to top 5 while his defense was the worst in the league for consecutive years.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 10:14 am to RB10
quote:
Imagine blaming Carr because the Saints have over $40 mil tied up in players that are no longer on the roster. That’s why the percentages are the way they are, not because Carr is the 18th highest paid QB in the league. ETA: And that’s not even including Ram or Lattimore now.
Agreed this is on Loomis. But why even waste money on Carr when hes not helping you win and still hurting your cap. Just walk away. There was no reason for us to sign Carr and then extend him as well. It was ill advised on many fronts.
Popular
Back to top
