- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can someone tell me what is the point of this article in nola.com?
Posted on 9/14/20 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 9/14/20 at 4:46 pm
11
Posted on 9/14/20 at 4:50 pm to IndianInBR
none of them were really pass interference
Posted on 9/14/20 at 4:52 pm to IndianInBR
I am with you. That was just a pointless article. She could have at least commented how questionable most of the PI calls were, but she basically just spent a few hundred words telling us both teams were called for penalties in the game.
Posted on 9/14/20 at 5:04 pm to IndianInBR
This is what we get when we let woman talk sports.
Posted on 9/14/20 at 5:09 pm to IndianInBR
I see Nola.com is trying to go with the Buzzfeed click-bait bullshite to generate web traffic. 
Posted on 9/14/20 at 5:53 pm to IndianInBR
Slow day.
Posted on 9/14/20 at 6:20 pm to IndianInBR
Hack writer pushing an NFL narrative that both teams benefited from perceptively questionable pass interference calls.
The typical nothing to see here and move on PR bullshite.
The typical nothing to see here and move on PR bullshite.
Posted on 9/14/20 at 7:26 pm to IndianInBR
She asked a question in the headline and didn’t answer the question? Wtf?
Posted on 9/14/20 at 7:57 pm to touchdownjeebus
Definitely could have been more clear, but the point was that all four PI penalties aided drives that resulted in a score for the Bucs.
Posted on 9/14/20 at 8:58 pm to IndianInBR
I was waiting for her claim "because they were black"... 
Posted on 9/14/20 at 9:55 pm to ezlife
quote:
Definitely could have been more clear, but the point was that all four PI penalties aided drives that resulted in a score for the Bucs.
I get the point, but it’s shite journalism. It leaves the reader waiting for the answer. The answer should have been in the first paragraph and following paragraphs should support her thesis.
Posted on 9/14/20 at 10:04 pm to IndianInBR
quote:
What did all 4 pass interference calls against the Saints have in common?
#3 will SHOCK you!
Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:35 am to IndianInBR
Hopefully I'm not the only one to think this, but when I watch other teams play, I see defensive backs make plays and think after "that would have been PI on us." I'm not a conspiracy guy, nor do I think that ultimately there's some bias involved, but man. I really feel like our guys have to play up to impossible expectations in coverage to be effective without giving up PI's.
For example, as a DB you're taught at 5 years old to have your trailing arm "around" the WR, and reach out your leading arm to defend any crossing route (slant, dig, drag, etc). I see that called as PI at an alarming rate.
For example, as a DB you're taught at 5 years old to have your trailing arm "around" the WR, and reach out your leading arm to defend any crossing route (slant, dig, drag, etc). I see that called as PI at an alarming rate.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 2:31 pm to IndianInBR
Salary justification
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News