- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/7/12 at 3:55 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Mackel reporting that Saints could sign Anthony Hargrove as early as tomorrow.
Seriously, though, Mackel doesn't know what the frick he's talking about.
Posted on 9/7/12 at 3:56 pm to sicboy
Also:
@SportsLawGuy: Remember-- this case is still pending before Judge Berrigan. Players can head back to court if unhappy w/ result of redetermination.
@SportsLawGuy: Remember-- this case is still pending before Judge Berrigan. Players can head back to court if unhappy w/ result of redetermination.
Posted on 9/7/12 at 3:57 pm to cdaniel76
quote:
Adam Schefter said that they would.
The Mackel reporter for WDSU Channel 6 said the coaches and Loomis are planning to file a suit in court this afternoon.
Filing suit for what? Vilma had an actual case with Goodell publicly making false claims against him and the NFLPA had a case because Goodell violated the CBA by saying an on field issue was off field. The coaches are not in a similar position.
95% of the people in this thread are irrationally exuberant and are acting like a war was won when this was just a battle. The players will be suspended again eventually. The only thing I see as more positive than expected is the way more of the media is turning and Goodell is becoming a joke on this issue.
Posted on 9/7/12 at 3:59 pm to TigerinATL
Even though this ruling has nothing to do with the coaches, if Goodell can't prove that there was intent to injure, then what would be the grounds that the coaches are suspended on? I feel like they would basically have to waive the coaching suspensions.
Posted on 9/7/12 at 3:59 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Mackel reporting that Saints could sign Anthony Hargrove as early as tomorrow.
did he say that on TV?
Posted on 9/7/12 at 3:59 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Roger Goodell
Suck. My. Dick.
Suck. My. Dick.
This post was edited on 9/7/12 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:00 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Can the OP please rename this thread or add disclaimer (dancing banana marathon)
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:00 pm to tehchampion140
If the panel says it agreed that there was a program set up for intent to injure, how hard will it actually be for Goodell to prove it?
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:01 pm to sicboy
quote:
Wrote this weeks ago. RT @DonBanks Appeals panel gives opportunity 4 settlement. Both NFL, players would be wise to meet in middle & move on
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:01 pm to FleuryNipples
Why rename it? There is a disclaimer
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:01 pm to sicboy
That's what I'm wondering. What exactly were they basing that on?
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:03 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:
Stephanie Stradley ?@StephStradley Just read the CBA Appeals Panel decision. It's a mess beyond my ability to explain in 140. Think not all CBA issues raised in FedCt answered
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:03 pm to Patrick O Rly
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:05 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
Mackel doesn't know what the frick he's talking about.
you don't say...
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:08 pm to sicboy
Yeah.
The more you look at it, the more it looks like this decision might have actually HELPED Goodell.
He now has a court ruling that backed his claim that the Saints had a pay to injure program.
Whatever punishments he decides for these four players, he'll now be able to say that the courts backed his claim. Also stops him from presenting any new "evidence" the players might scream for when it was enough for the courts.
The more you look at it, the more it looks like this decision might have actually HELPED Goodell.
He now has a court ruling that backed his claim that the Saints had a pay to injure program.
Whatever punishments he decides for these four players, he'll now be able to say that the courts backed his claim. Also stops him from presenting any new "evidence" the players might scream for when it was enough for the courts.
This post was edited on 9/7/12 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:10 pm to sicboy
quote:
If the panel says it agreed that there was a program set up for intent to injure, how hard will it actually be for Goodell to prove it?
This. Either they saw something we haven't, or they're tools like so many others in this process.
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:10 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Sean should have sued immediately. These assholes in the NFL have no proof.
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:11 pm to Supernova
Posted on 9/7/12 at 4:11 pm to eyeran
quote:
Yeah.
The more you look at it, the more it looks like this decision might have actually HELPED Goodell.
He now has a court ruling that backed his claim that the Saints had a pay to injure program.
Whatever punishments he decides for these four players, he'll now be able to say that the courts backed his pay for injure claim.
I know. Thats why I want the actual text of the ruling. I don't trust anything coming from the NFL or ESPN at face value.
Page 18 of 24
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News