Started By
Message

re: Attorney for Smith family / Attorney for Hayes l Press Conference Recap

Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:20 pm to
Posted by Sparkplug#1
Member since May 2013
7352 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:20 pm to
Sorry I don't have more details. My friend is a little freaked out and stressed to the max. I can't really push him. He didn't even call me back last night. I had to call him again, today.

What I got from it (could be wrong), smith and shooter arguing while Raquel went for the gun. Shooter shot her deliberately to stop her, then shot Will.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130312 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

I just think you always say everything is bad for Hayes, when it usually is a neutral point without other factors. I think you have been extremely biased.



Probably because everything is pretty bad for Hayes. I don't particularly care one way or the other. One person shot and killed another. The person who actually killed the other one has a very hard uphill battle against them.

I just think that there is a group on here that desperately wants Smith to be the bad guy here, and literally everything that happens they are jumping with glee and trying to spin it in a way to get Hayes off. I truly don't understand it, its very bizarre.

You guys are spinning every little supposed fact in a way that is just not reality. And you also mostly don't know what you're talking about.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:22 pm to
I really wish we could all be put to sleep until all the evidence was gathered and testimony completed. And then we can discuss. Because alot of us are solid people, who are arguing possibilities without knowing There are a few assholes on each side who think they are "right," but for the most part it is people arguing over possible situations
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Probably because everything is pretty bad for Hayes
Some is. But since the initial report, there has been things that came out that have helped him. The question is, what more is there to be released?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74444 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

What don't you White Knighters get about this? I'm so perplexed




Are you still under the assumption he shot RS while she was walking back to the Mercedes?

Otherwise you're the one not getting it

quote:

I just think that there is a group on here that desperately wants Smith to be the bad guy here, and literally everything that happens they are jumping with glee and trying to spin it in a way to get Hayes off. I truly don't understand it, its very bizarre


Nvm I get you're angle

I think you badly want to believe the above paragraph.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 3:26 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179042 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

But yesterday, the narrative from you was Smith was in his vehicle


For someone looking to find wrongs in someone else, this is an entirely inaccurate statement.
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Sorry I don't have more details. My friend is a little freaked out and stressed to the max. I can't really push him. He didn't even call me back last night. I had to call him again, today.

What I got from it (could be wrong), smith and shooter arguing while Raquel went for the gun. Shooter shot her deliberately to stop her, then shot Will.


So Hayes, while struggling with a 6'3 270lb Smith, was able to get off 2 extremely accurate rounds to her legs then popped Smith at close range? That would mean that Hayes got out and confronted Smith at his car with his gun in his hand. That makes him the aggressor does it not?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130312 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Are you still under the assumption he shot RS while she was walking back to the Mercedes?



I'm under the assumption that no one knows a goddamn thing. The way I interpreted Spark's assessment was inaccurate.

quote:

Nvm I get you're angle

I think you badly want to believe the above paragraph.




I'm not even sure what that means. There was a group of people on here literally directly after it happened already knighting hard for Hayes, before there was even a sliver of thought about self-defense. It was truly a bizarre stance at the time and its carried on.

I don't want anything to happen. I just find the whole phenomenon on here to be quite weird. I really don't particularly care what happens in this case one way or the other, as long as its the right result.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74444 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:30 pm to
He said arguing not struggling


I don't care how big Hayes is, he's not popping one in each knee of RS while struggling with an all pro NFL DL
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130312 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

o Hayes, while struggling with a 6'3 270lb Smith, was able to get off 2 extremely accurate rounds to her legs then popped Smith at close range? That would mean that Hayes got out and confronted Smith at his car with his gun in his hand. That makes him the aggressor does it not?


Eh it depends. That sequence of events could make it a Stand Your Ground type of deal, assuming other factors are in place (or not in place as it were).

In that scenario, if believable, he has a better chance of getting off...depending.
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

He said arguing not struggling


I don't care how big Hayes is, he's not popping one in each knee of RS while struggling with an all pro NFL DL


He used the term "blocking" meaning Smith was between Hayes and his wife. Either way, how the frick did that cat get 2 extremely accurate shots to the legs around a fricking NFL DL?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Either way, how the frick did that cat get 2 extremely accurate shots to the legs around a fricking NFL DL?

How do you know they were accurate? He might have been aiming for her head
Posted by 5Alive
With Your Moms
Member since Jul 2009
7877 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:39 pm to
And will just let him pull the gun and get off two shots without any interference? Thst doesn't even match up with what the guy at the scene said on camera. He for sure would have mentioned RS running to the car.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74444 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

I'm under the assumption that no one knows a goddamn thing


Exactly

Which is odd that you're condemning one side or another, considering what we all know to be the facts?

quote:

There was a group of people on here literally directly after it happened already knighting hard for Hayes, before there was even a sliver of thought about self-defense. It was truly a bizarre stance at the time and its carried o




Cmon man

I was in those threads directly after it went down. The people who were waiting for the facts (the white knighters in this case) all of a sudden were thought of as Hayes supporters. You seem to be in the camp of waiting for facts based upon your above statement, so I don't see why you're acting like we want Hayes to get off the hook

quote:

I just find the whole phenomenon on here to be quite weird. I really don't particularly care what happens in this case one way or the other, as long as its the right result.


Dude, these die hard saint fans are going to go bonkers if Hayes is exonerated. There is going to be tons of public backlash.

I honestly have not seen anyone who would be upset if the facts say Hayes is guilty.


Think about what you're saying. You seriously think people are gonna be upset if the facts show Hayes is a cold blooded killer? You and others are operating under this assumption and its ludicrous
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179042 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:39 pm to
Thomson said that Racquel Smith walked her husband back to their vehicle, but that "the killer follows them" and shot Smith's wife in both her legs, from the side, as she stood with her husband on the driver's side of their SUV. Thomson said one .45-caliber bullet fractured her right femur near her knee, and another went through her left thigh.

from article, sure doesn't sound like racquel was reaching into a vehicle for a gun if she's standing next to Will on driver's side.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 3:41 pm
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
20839 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

What I got from it (could be wrong), smith and shooter arguing while Raquel went for the gun. Shooter shot her deliberately to stop her, then shot Will.


This doesn't quite add up to what Smith's attorney described.

After the Smiths thought the matter had been defused, I understood them to have walked back to their driver's door. Will was between the Shooter and Racquel and she would have been facing him while Will was not. There were no diagrams to show where the Shooter was standing at this time and I don't remember everything he said.

If Racquel had been "going for the gun" it means that the Shooter re-approached them at their car door and didn't allow her to step closer to the vehicle to get the gun.

She is then shot in both legs and crawls off toward the sidewalk as Will is taking shots to the back.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66109 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

You guys are spinning every little supposed fact in a way that is just not reality


this is going the other way too. don't kid yourself.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

This doesn't quite add up to what Smith's attorney described.

I wouldnt put too much stock in the attorney, on either side
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74444 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

He used the term "blocking" meaning Smith was between Hayes and his wife


Smiths own attorney painted a picture of this. Blocking in this instance means Will was in between Hayes and RS (distance unknown)
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

rom article, sure doesn't sound like racquel was reaching into a vehicle for a gun if she's standing next to Will on driver's side.
Well, color me shocked Thomson wouldnt say his client was reaching for a gun


ETA: I am in no way saying she was. But no shite her attorney wouldnt say that
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 3:43 pm
Jump to page
Page First 56 57 58 59 60 ... 69
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 58 of 69Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram