Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Anyone else thinking Armstead ends up back in NO?

Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:19 pm
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
19358 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:19 pm
the longer he goes without getting picked up, the more I think he sticks around (especially if we land Watson)
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
28282 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

the more I think he sticks around

if they can make the money work... but not sure that will happen
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48320 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:22 pm to
im not convinced. the cap situation will make it nearly impossible to keep him.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23711 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:22 pm to
I think he’s waiting to see how Watson plays out.
Posted by WhoGeaux
Member since Apr 2011
5559 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:23 pm to
I think he's tied to Watson at this point...each player is being used as a selling point to the other but it's all or neither.
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
19358 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:24 pm to
Don't we save money by keeping him?
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32450 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:25 pm to
I just don’t know about paying him big money. He’s always injured. I’d rather pay less money to someone that may not have as much upside but is always on the field.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48320 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:26 pm to
That's a good point. If we sign Watson, there is likely zero money to resign him... but if its Winston, he probably gets a deal especially with Williams gone. who knows though
Posted by WhoGeaux
Member since Apr 2011
5559 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:29 pm to
You can save cap money by resigning Armstead.

If armstead leaves all void year dead cap accelerates to this year.

I'd anticipate you could save about $3-5 mill against the cap by actually signing him.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48320 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:32 pm to
sure, but that all depends on the other offers he gets and how other contracts fall into place. You have to think beyond this year or else we will be right back in this boat again.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63722 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

I think he's tied to Watson at this point...each player is being used as a selling point to the other but it's all or neither.



I doubt it. Salary cap is a real thing, and I just don't see both being able to co-exist. And, I don't think you'd invest in a LT without a premier QB either.

I think he's going to get his best offer, and give the Saints a chance to counter. In the end, I just don't think it can work out.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74482 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:25 pm to
He’s said publicly he’s going to slow play free agency. He’s likely sitting on multiple offers
Posted by WhoGeaux
Member since Apr 2011
5559 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Salary cap is a real thing


It's real to an extent. It's very elastic.

The biggest facade is the credit card analogy and the "bill finally coming due" and that's where it's not real. There are no expiration of terms...there is always next year...there is always an extension to the time. Despite years of seeing this people still don't allow themselves to acknowledge this differentiation from real life borrowing.
Posted by WhoGeaux
Member since Apr 2011
5559 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

You have to think beyond this year


They always do. All contracts are strategically implemented

quote:

or else we will be right back in this boat again.


What's wrong with the boat we're in right now? It's been a good boat for greater than 10 years at this point. It's a strategic advantage they've implemented and the rest of the league is still playing catch up.


The biggest component is ownerships willingness to stroke big checks at the GM's beck and call. Not all ownership groups are willing to do that.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22284 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

That's a good point. If we sign Watson, there is likely zero money to resign him.

They have to get under the cap to trade for Watson's $35M cap hit. Once he's with the Saints, you could convert majority to a roster bonus and spread it over 5 years. Use $30M as example. Has $5M salary, and $6M cap hit for bonus; therefore, saving $24M against cap. In addition, Watson is happy with new deal bc if league suspends him his lost game checks will decrease from $2M+ a game check to $294k a game check
Posted by hellsu
Northshore via Westbank
Member since Jan 2009
4162 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

He’s said publicly he’s going to slow play free agency. He’s likely sitting on multiple offers


And this makes sense. He is at the top of almost everyones list of valued FA's. He can afford to take his time and see how this plays out.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48320 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

What's wrong with the boat we're in right now? It's been a good boat for greater than 10 years at this point.


I dont disagree in principle, we just have too many fat contracts that are all grouped together in tight chronological windows. That hasnt been the case for most of the SP era.
Posted by LlyodChristmas
The Abandoned Jazzland
Member since Jan 2013
2189 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 2:55 pm to
Underhill was talking about this on the radio this morning. He thinks if the trade happens, they’ll bring him back because at that point you go all-in on a super bowl
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
131968 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 3:25 pm to
Matt Miller of NFLDraftScout

quote:

Terron Armstead update: Multiple sources I've talked to today believe the OT is waiting to see if the Saints land Deshaun Watson before deciding his next home. As of now, that's what I'm told is slowing his signing.
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11554 posts
Posted on 3/15/22 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

im not convinced. the cap situation will make it nearly impossible to keep him.


IIRC, if he leaves, there would be $12m in dead money. Better to keep him if the price is right.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram